Dne 28.1.2011 02:51, bf...@free-man.net napsal(a):
The certificate is not trusted because it is self-signed.
The certificate is only valid for free-man.net
what am I doing wrong?
You can not use name-based virtual hosts for SSL if your Apache is older than
2.2.12
or your OpenSSL does not supp
Whats the URI that is not working? What is your jk_module configuration in
the httpd.conf file? Do you have the appropriate JkMount statements in it?
Post it here please the code between these two
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Jehan Badshah wrote:
>
> Yes! to tomcat/conf/server.xml
>
> I
Yes! to tomcat/conf/server.xml
I have already added
to 172.16.100.122
to 172.16.100.121
to localhost
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Igor Cicimov wrote:
> Did you configure the Tomcats though? Make sure that jvmRoute attribute is
> set at your Engine so for the first one you need t
Did you configure the Tomcats though? Make sure that jvmRoute attribute is
set at your Engine so for the first one you need to have
for second one
etc.
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Jehan Badshah wrote:
>
> Dear all
>
> Following is the configuration of *worker.properties* file,
> using
Dear all
Following is the configuration of *worker.properties* file,
using that configuration my browser (or apache) goes in endless loop.
please help.
-
*worker.properties*
worker.list=
Hello.
It seems that mod_dir does not work properly with SSL (https).
When working with http, there is no problem:
If url "http://www.abc.com/test"; is requested, apache appends a "/" to the url
and then respones to browser with code 301, telling it to request the
newly-modified url ""http://ww
Apache version 2.2.3
CentOS Linux 5.5
/etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl.config
changes
#
#SSLCertificateFile /etc/pki/tls/certs/localhost.crt
SSLCertificateFile /etc/pki/tls/certs/free-man-net.crt
#SSLCertificateKeyFile /etc/pki/tls/private/localhost.key
SSLCertificateKeyFile /etc/pki/tls/private/free-mman-
On Jan 27, 2011, at 7:45 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Hi...
>
> (Yes I've read the documentation section about merging sections, but
> IMHO it's not absolutely clear IMHO)
>
> I have one vhost containing about:
> ...
>
> SSLRequireSSL
>
> ...
> and possibly also a later locatio
Hi...
(Yes I've read the documentation section about merging sections, but
IMHO it's not absolutely clear IMHO)
I have one vhost containing about:
...
SSLRequireSSL
...
and possibly also a later location-section on /, containing other
directives, e.g.
#do e.g. some proxy stuff
Am 27.01.2011 16:34, schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
On 22.01.11 00:53, john.3.new...@bt.com wrote:
We recently moved our production webserver from a sparc platform (T2000)
to an x86/64 platform (x2270-m2) and we have noticed an erratic response
time for downloads of files using SSL. This seems
Sorry!
Did not mean to!
Matus UHLAR - fantomas
01/27/2011 10:32 AM
Please respond to
users@httpd.apache.org
To
users@httpd.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: [users@httpd] Status 3221225480 and restart
On 24.01.11 11:09, wolfgang.mi...@geigerus.com wrote:
> In-Reply-To:
> t.
To my unexperienced eye you need node1, node2 and node3 in your
worker.list property as well as the loadbalance and status workers.
Hth,
Lukas
__
Lukas Sklenar
From: Jehan Badshah [mailto:jehan.bads...@nu.edu.
On 22.01.11 00:53, john.3.new...@bt.com wrote:
>
> We recently moved our production webserver from a sparc platform (T2000)
> to an x86/64 platform (x2270-m2) and we have noticed an erratic response
> time for downloads of files using SSL. This seems to randomly occur with
> any files about 10k or
On 24.01.11 11:09, wolfgang.mi...@geigerus.com wrote:
> In-Reply-To:
> t.net>
> References:
> t.net>
> t.net>
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> From: wolfgang.mi...@geigerus.com
> Subject: [users@httpd] Status 3221225480 and restart
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am runnin
I'd forgotten about Strawberry Perl (came across it about a year ago, but never got around to trying
it). One question, though: I'm thinking there's not much point to using a 64-bit version of mod_perl
unless I'm using it with a 64-bit version of Apache. Where can I get a 64-bit version of Apache
Hello everyone
We are using apache's mod_proxy (reverse proxy) to make two internal
webapps available over the internet. It works fine so far.
We now tried to use digest authentication on the proxy to secure the
access to the proxy itself. One webapp has no problem with that
approach. You fi
Hi
Am 27.01.2011 um 12:57 schrieb Michiel Beijen :
> Hi John,
>
> On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 10:17 -0500, John Deighan wrote:
>> However, we're also not sure if either of these are needed to escape the
>> 2 GB memory limitation. E.g., can 64 bit Perl be used with a 32 bit
>> Apache and/or mod_perl?
Dear all
Following is the configuration of *worker.properties* file,
using that configuration my browser (or apache) goes in endless loop.
please help.
-
*worker.properties*
worker.list=
Dear all
Following is the configuration of *worker.properties* file,
using that configuration my browser (or apache) goes in endless loop.
please help.
-
*worker.properties*
worker.list=l
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Martin Kuba wrote:
> Hi Jehan,
>
> it is a FAQ:
> http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/FAQ/Connectors#Q2
>
> In my experience, the only difference is the ability of mod_jk to
> pass the SSL_* environment variables using the JkEnv directive,
> mod_proxy_ajp cannot do this
Thanks Martin.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Martin Kuba wrote:
> Dne 27.1.2011 09:50, Jehan Badshah napsal(a):
>
> Dear
>> We can do loadbalancing using both mod_jk and mod_proxy.
>> what is the difference between them.
>>
>
> Hi Jehan,
>
> it is a FAQ:
> http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/FAQ
Dne 27.1.2011 09:50, Jehan Badshah napsal(a):
Dear
We can do loadbalancing using both mod_jk and mod_proxy.
what is the difference between them.
Hi Jehan,
it is a FAQ:
http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/FAQ/Connectors#Q2
In my experience, the only difference is the ability of mod_jk to
pass the SS
Dear
We can do loadbalancing using both mod_jk and mod_proxy.
what is the difference between them.
Regards
23 matches
Mail list logo
