> My problem is differentiating between the two "koha" sites, one on port 80,
> the other on port 8080 - that is why I included just those two vhost entries
> (the listen and VirtualHostName entries are - I think sufficient.) The
> workstation Win boxes 'hosts' files will not take a port# as an arg
At 06:03 PM 10/24/2010 -0400, Eric Covener wrote:
> HOWEVER, from the XP boxes on the LAN they were not
> directly visible using http://site1
None of your name-based vhosts know about "site1".
Thanks for the reply. I did not want to "overload" my original post, so did
not paste the relevant V
> HOWEVER, from the XP boxes on the LAN they were not
> directly visible using http://site1
None of your name-based vhosts know about "site1".
Was your result from the browser just the contents of the default
(first-listed) vhost for the 192.168.0.20 vhost? Or something else?
--
Eric Covener
co
I've done a few things already: blocked certain IP blocks, block know
problematic user agents. I'm trying to collect a list of Apache and
site hardening (.htaccess) methods. Please share your favorite.
Jason N
-
The official User
Apache 2.2 on ubuntu server 10.10 [LAN only, no WAN] all running well,
except that virtualhosts is not functional as expected. All other LAN boxes
are Win XP Pro SP2 and can see the ubuntu server2 (hard coded IPs for LAN,
no DHCP.) 192.168.0.20 is NameVirtualHost on the ubuntu server2.
Set up
Hi All,
I am planning to use logrotate to rotate log files in apache can you
guys plz share your experiences with it. How stable is it? Does it do buffered
writes to the log files.
Does it also do buffered writes when doing compressed outputs.Can logrotate
produce both compressed an
Hi All,
Is there any support of buffered writes in rotatelogs? As of now
the
code in rotatelogs uses write everytime which can lead to many disk writes is
there
some code /patch which writes first to buffer and then to the log file.
Thanks & Regards,
Anurag
