--
From: "Dan Bunyard"
Sent: 27 January, 2010 12:22
To:
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Runaway Apache Process
I'm going to try to answer all the questions in one email here.
@Daniel Reinhardt
Here are the full specs:
CPU: Pentium Dual Core E2220 @
I'm trying to troubleshoot a Nokia E71x having problems connecting to
our OWA server via an Apache 2.2.13 reverse proxy.
As part of the troubleshooting, I noticed that in response to a Sync
request (all done via HTTP/1.1 btw), we recieve a response from the OWA
server with the following HTTP chara
So perhaps someone on the users list has an alternative method for addressing
the issue we are encountering.
Our setup is that we have Amazon EC2 instances serving our web content. If we
logged the request host IP, we would have a log filled with the IP's of the
Amazon load balancers. Therefore
Hi Dan,
If we replaced Sed with Cat, I'm a little confused as to what we would
be catting; there's a stream coming in, right?
To your second question - yes, logging is fully functional with sudo
To your final question - no, even with a sed command that performs no actions,
no logging in
Isn't cronolog highly dependent on the w3c log convention?
- Original Message -
From: Dan Poirier [poir...@pobox.com]
Sent: 01/27/2010 03:02 PM EST
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [us...@httpd] Re: mod_log_config issue
Joe Hammerman writes:
> Hello Apache users list.
>
> We have
Joe Hammerman writes:
> Hello Apache users list.
>
> We have an issue with mod_log_config; specifically we are trying to pipe log
> output through Sed before it goes to Cronolog. The result is that we get no
> output whatsoever.
>
> Here is a sample of the directives we are using in our Virtual
Arun,
This is just a WAG, but I think that the problem still lies in the client side
and how the load balancer is handling the requests. I would still be
interested in seeing the netstat -atunep output from one of he affected
machines when there is a high level of connections in a closed stat
Hello Apache users list.
We have an issue with mod_log_config; specifically we are trying to pipe log
output through Sed before it goes to Cronolog. The result is that we get no
output whatsoever.
Here is a sample of the directives we are using in our VirtualHost container:
CustomLog "| /b
I have a situation where presentation of an X.509 certificate by a user
in two-way SSL is considered authoritative for identification purposes,
however I need to use the directory for attribute and authorization
information.
The LDAP server expects me to bind via my server certificate with
two-way
Arunkumar,
There is no problem with what I see. The load balancer will balance a
requester to a machine for a period of time. So if my web clients makes a
request to your server, I will probably have a higher probability of getting
that same server. It's like iptables connection tracking. L
Hello
am Mittwoch, 27. Januar 2010 um 17:22 schrieben Sie:
> On 22.01.10 14:59, J. Bakshi wrote:
>> Two newbie questions
>>
>> [1] I am running a development server with multiple vhosts. Presently
>> all logs can be seen at /etc/apache2/log/error.log and at
>> /etc/apache2/log/access.log. How
On 24.01.10 19:27, Jonathan Hayward wrote:
> I am getting an error in my log if I visit
> http://jonathanscorner.com/admin/but not
> http://jonathanscorner.com/admin/index.html under Apache 1.3.x. The two
> URL's serve up the same file; on a visit to
> http://jonathanscorner.com/admin/ , DirectoryI
On 22.01.10 14:59, J. Bakshi wrote:
> Two newbie questions
>
> [1] I am running a development server with multiple vhosts. Presently
> all logs can be seen at /etc/apache2/log/error.log and at
> /etc/apache2/log/access.log. How can I break the logs for each and every
> vhosts ; so that the log
> Igor Cicimov wrote:
>> So you are trying to connect to port 80 on the server not 443? The SSL
>> host listens to 443 so what do you expect to happen when you connect to
>> port 80 as shown in your test? Have you redirected the port 80 to 443
>> in your configuration or what?
On 21.01.10 18:
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 09:47 -0500, Arunkumar Janarthanan wrote:
> Hi Nilesh,
>
> Thanks for your response.
>
> I have already checked this with Load balancer support found the
> requests are getting sitributed eventually from Netscaler end.
>
> So was chekcing if this could be an issue or known
I think I done that right, I added this to my httpd.conf file:
LoadModule log_forensic_module modules/mod_log_forensic.so
#Forensic logging
ForensicLog logs/forensic_log
I am seeing stuff in the forensic_log so I guess that's right. I will take
a look at it the next time it happens. Thanks for
Hi Nilesh,
Thanks for your response.
I have already checked this with Load balancer support found the requests
are getting sitributed eventually from Netscaler end.
So was chekcing if this could be an issue or known behaviour with Apache.
Best Regards,
Arun J
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 9:43 AM, N
On 01/27/2010 08:06 PM, Arunkumar Janarthanan wrote:
Hello All,
We have apache servers running on RedHat Linux physical servers, all 4
servers are balanced by Citrix Netscaler 8.1 load balancer with round
robin weight load sharing algorithm.
However when I check the server status page to find t
Hello All,
We have apache servers running on RedHat Linux physical servers, all 4
servers are balanced by Citrix Netscaler 8.1 load balancer with round robin
weight load sharing algorithm.
However when I check the server status page to find the number of requests
are served by each Apache ser
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Dan Bunyard wrote:
> @Jeff
> The last request made before it goes out of control doesn't seem to be
> unique in any way, it appears to be the Yandex spider just crawling one of
> the sites:
> 87.250.252.242 - - [25/Jan/2010:11:38:00 -0500] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 301 359
@Jeff
The last request made before it goes out of control doesn't seem to be
unique in any way, it appears to be the Yandex spider just crawling one of
the sites:
87.250.252.242 - - [25/Jan/2010:11:38:00 -0500] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 301 359 "-"
"Yandex/1.01.001 (compatible; Win16; I)"
That was the very
Hi All,
I am using Apache Webserver (version ) which is FIPS enabled using OpenSSL. As
long as I have used Symantec Antivirus (11.0 - patch update MR4MP2) the
webserver was working fine. When I updated my antivirus to (11.0.5002.333 i.e.
patch update RU5) apache webserver stopped working. I can
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Dan Bunyard wrote:
> @Mark
> I will do that the next time it happens. I will also trim down the modules,
> I think I had done a mass install of a bunch of things I needed but in the
> process picked up a lot of them that I don't/won't use.
That's a good suggestio
Hi Eric,
Yes, both are 1.3.
I don't have Apache2.pm -- the mod_perl2 module -- installed.
[r...@data2 ~]# perl -MApache2 -le 'print mod_perl->VERSION'
Can't locate Apache2.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /www/perl/
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.7/i686-linux /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.7
/usr/local/lib/perl5/
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Chris Brooks wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> Thanks for the note. Both apache and mod_perl are up-to-date:
>
> [r...@data2 ~]# /usr/local/apache-perl/bin/httpd -v
> Server version: Apache/1.3.41 (Unix)
> Server built: Sep 2 2009 15:34:13
Both systems are 1.3?
--
Eric
Next time your system goes wonky, check the following:
# netstat -plant | grep httpd | grep -c ESTABLISHED
This should say 100 or so, indicating you've filled MaxClients worth of
processes.
You might want to try this, which should tell you how many connections
each IP address connecting to you
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Dan Bunyard wrote:
> I have never done a backtrace, can you please point me in the right
> direction for that?
gdb /path/to/httpd PID
...
(gdb) where
(backtrace displayed here)
(gdb) quit
run gdb as root if you start httpd as root
> I didn't check CPU usage at t
Hi Eric,
Thanks for the note. Both apache and mod_perl are up-to-date:
[r...@data2 ~]# /usr/local/apache-perl/bin/httpd -v
Server version: Apache/1.3.41 (Unix)
Server built: Sep 2 2009 15:34:13
[r...@data2 ~]# perl -Mmod_perl -le 'print mod_perl->VERSION'
1.31
Thanks,
Chris
On Wed, Jan 27,
I have never done a backtrace, can you please point me in the right
direction for that?
I didn't check CPU usage at the time, only load average which was around 100
(normally it's between 0.02 and 0.5 over 1 minute).
I was able to log in but it was VERY slow. As I watched the load average it
was
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Dan Bunyard wrote:
> This has happened twice now and it's a little bit concerning to me. I have a
> Fedora 12 server with 5GB of RAM that I use to host a few small web sites of
> mine. As I mentioned, this happened once before. I tried to load one of my
> web sites
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Chris Brooks wrote:
> Good morning Apache list,
>
> I have a strange mod_rewrite problem, and I'm not sure how to solve it. I
> have a RewriteRule that works correctly on one apache daemon, but doesn't
> work when copied and pasted to the httpd.conf file of a sec
Hi,
I'm implementing two reverse proxies reverse proxy in front of two application
server farms in different data centers, where each customer has one specific
target server. The rewrite rules below are working, but might do several
external
redirects, which I'd like to reduce if possible.
It
Good morning Krist,
Thank you very much for your reply.
No, I don't have any blocks in the httpd.conf, although this is a
mod_perl enabled apache daemon.
Thanks,
Chris
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 5:16 AM, Krist van Besien wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Chris Brooks wrote:
>
>
> > Any
--
From: "Dan Bunyard"
Sent: 27 January, 2010 1:28
To:
Subject: [us...@httpd] Runaway Apache Process
This has happened twice now and it's a little bit concerning to me. I have a
Fedora 12 server with 5GB of RAM that I use to host a few small web
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Chris Brooks wrote:
> Any suggestions as to what might be going on?
You are not using any sections by chance, are you?
Krist
--
krist.vanbes...@gmail.com
kr...@vanbesien.org
Bremgarten b. Bern, Switzerland
--
A: It reverses the normal flow of conversation.
Q
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 2:34 AM, RYAN vAN GINNEKEN wrote:
> Please help as i have been struggling with this problem for a long time and
> do not know what else to try for troubleshooting.
Are you sure that the requests are going to the virtualhost you expect
them to go to?
What is the output
> -Message d'origine-
> De : mearn...@gmail.com [mailto:mearn...@gmail.com] De la part de Brian
> Mearns
> Envoyé : mardi 26 janvier 2010 21:28
> À : users@httpd.apache.org
> Objet : [us...@httpd] SSL Reverse Proxy
>
> I'm looking for some clarification on how to setup a reverse proxy
> th
37 matches
Mail list logo