On 15-Jan-2010, at 11:19, Kpadvel wrote:
> In-Reply-To: <2e027be01001150934m482eb453p1d6bee636977a...@mail.gmail.com>
Please do not hijack someone else's thread to start your own thread. Changing
the subject is not enough. Start a new message addressed to the list.
--
Vampires are [...] by natu
On 15-Jan-2010, at 12:38, Scott Gifford wrote:
> I think using a LAN/VLAN connection would be a fair measure. You could also
> consider running the tests as instances on Amazon EC2, which will let you
> lease a small pool of servers for a few hours for $20 or so.
That's a good idea. I'd forgotte
On 15-Jan-2010, at 10:34, Jarrod Slick wrote:
>>> So, I should be more specific with my question: to the end of determining
>>> strictly which webserver is more efficient do you see any problems with
>>> this type of setup?
>>
>> More 'efficient' I think you mean.
>
> Is that not exactly what
Hi
these are my config files
in httpd.conf add
LoadModule proxy_module modules/mod_proxy.so
LoadModule proxy_http_module modules/mod_proxy_http.so
LoadModule proxy_ajp_module modules/mod_proxy_ajp.so
LoadModule proxy_balancer_module modules/mod_proxy_balancer.so
and include the
Jarrod Slick wrote:
> On Jan 15, 2010, at 10:25 AM, Tommy M. McGuire wrote:
>
>> Jarrod Slick wrote:
>>>
>>> All tests will be performed on localhost.
>>
>> I did not want to comment since I am not an Apache nor LiteSpeed
>> performance expert,
>> but I rather suspect that will invalidate any resu
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Jarrod Slick wrote:
[ ... ]
> And another question: how would you do it differently? Sure, in an ideal
> world I could assemble my own botnet and then blast my corporate network
> with a gigabit of distributed traffic multiple times for each webserver --
> but ob
I have a doubt about mod_disk_cache.
Once configured for the main host, does it apply for all vhosts too ?
--
Nilesh Govindarajan
Site & Server Adminstrator
www.itech7.com
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache
Our apache version is 2.2.3 and we are having a problem in getting a file open.
We use directive to connect to the backend weblogic. Proxypass is
not enabled.
When the user access a url they get 404 because %2f is not converting to "/"
I tried adding AllowEncodedSlashes On after spending hours
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Mark Feather
wrote:
> Would:
>
>
>
> ServerName www.example.co.uk:80
> ServerAlias *.example.* example.*
> DocumentRoot /path/to/blah/blah
>
> etc...
> etc...
>
>
>
> Work better?
>
I believe that wildcards can only be used for matching subdomains of hosts.
Che
So, I should be more specific with my question: to the end of
determining strictly which webserver is more efficient do you see
any problems with this type of setup?
More 'efficient' I think you mean.
Is that not exactly what I said?
And another question: how would you do it differen
> From: LuKreme [mailto:krem...@kreme.com]
> Sent: January 15, 2010 11:45 AM
>
> On 15-Jan-2010, at 09:29, Jarrod Slick wrote:
> > I'm curious -- why do you think that the results will be
> inconsistent? If anything I would be inclined to think that using
> localhost would improve consistency as
On 15-Jan-2010, at 10:08, Jarrod Slick wrote:
> On Jan 15, 2010, at 11:03 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Jarrod Slick
>> wrote:
>>
>>> What about having a private VLAN between a testing machine and the apache
>>> machine. I suppose that would solve the resource sep
> From the doc :
>
>
> This flag is just a hack to enable post-processing of the output of
> RewriteRule directives, using Alias, ScriptAlias, Redirect, and other
> directives from various URI-to-filename translators
>
> If I understand well (correct me if I'm wrong), after RewriteRule has
> app
On Jan 15, 2010, at 11:03 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Jarrod Slick > wrote:
What about having a private VLAN between a testing machine and the
apache
machine. I suppose that would solve the resource separation
problem between
the benchmarking tool and the web
On Jan 15, 2010, at 10:44 AM, LuKreme wrote:
Run thousands of test across multiple connections from multiple
sources for each server if you want to see what the performance is
ACTUALLY like.
Unfortunately multiple sources is impractical for me unless you want
to donate some hardware. Tha
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Jarrod Slick wrote:
> What about having a private VLAN between a testing machine and the apache
> machine. I suppose that would solve the resource separation problem between
> the benchmarking tool and the web server. Can you think of any problems
> with this t
On Jan 15, 2010, at 10:45 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Jarrod Slick > wrote:
I'm curious -- why do you think that the results will be
inconsistent? If
anything I would be inclined to think that using localhost would
improve
consistency as extraneous variables like n
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Jarrod Slick wrote:
> I'm curious -- why do you think that the results will be inconsistent? If
> anything I would be inclined to think that using localhost would improve
> consistency as extraneous variables like network congestion at the time of
> testing would
On 15-Jan-2010, at 09:29, Jarrod Slick wrote:
> I'm curious -- why do you think that the results will be inconsistent? If
> anything I would be inclined to think that using localhost would improve
> consistency as extraneous variables like network congestion at the time of
> testing would not b
Would:
ServerName www.example.co.uk:80
ServerAlias *.example.* example.*
DocumentRoot /path/to/blah/blah
etc...
etc...
Work better?
- Original Message -
From: "Peter J Milanese"
To: "users"
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Virtualhosts - Startin
On Jan 15, 2010, at 10:25 AM, Tommy M. McGuire wrote:
Jarrod Slick wrote:
All tests will be performed on localhost.
I did not want to comment since I am not an Apache nor LiteSpeed
performance expert,
but I rather suspect that will invalidate any results you get. At
least it will make i
Jarrod Slick wrote:
>
> All tests will be performed on localhost.
I did not want to comment since I am not an Apache nor LiteSpeed performance
expert,
but I rather suspect that will invalidate any results you get. At least it will
make it
much harder to get any kind of consistent results.
--
Yes, something of that sort.
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Feather" [m...@akwe-xavante.demon.co.uk]
Sent: 01/15/2010 01:22 PM GMT
To:
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Virtualhosts - Starting from afresh
Thank you Peter,
Do you mean
ServerName www.example.co.uk:80
Serve
Thank you Peter,
Do you mean
ServerName www.example.co.uk:80
ServerAlias example.co.uk
ServerAlias www.example.com
ServerAlias example.com
DocumentRoot /path/to/blah/blah
etc...
etc...
Mark
- Original Message -
From: "Peter J Milanese"
To: "users"
Sent: Friday, Jan
If you are using all zones to serve the same content, enter 3 of them in the
configuration under the 'ServerAlias' directive.
Use the 'ServerName' directive for the your main identity zone.
-p
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Feather" [m...@akwe-xavante.demon.co.uk]
Sent: 01/15/2010 1
Hoping somebody can help me here.
I have an old Linux box running apache that's at least 7 years old. It has
several virtualhosts setup on it that are working seamlessly.
I have built a new Linux box and I have the latest version of Apache up and
running with its main server configuration se
I have a two Apache 2.2.13 servers. One is a straight proxy (doing SSL
offload) through to the other.
The proxy has the following settings relating to my issue:
ErrorDocument 404 /errors/error404.html
ProxyErrorOverride on
ProxyPass/ http://192.168.1.1/
27 matches
Mail list logo
