Hi,
Try this in your configure script to build on 64 bit OS.
--enable-lib64 --libdir=/usr/lib64
Regards
Nasir
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 2:51 AM, Aruna Gummalla wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to build Apache HTTP Server for 32 bit and 64 bit linux OS. How
> do I specify the option for x86-64 bit OS
On 11/17/2009 11:37 AM, sieger...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks a lot folks. I am getting some sort of handle here .
The problem is If I use the original key and the certificate that
they give me, the web server does not start I assume because the CN,
OU, etc. does not match.I just want a SSL cert t
chuck,
* chuck.pa...@travelchannel.com [2009-11-17
17:42]:
> Because we are running productions, as stated on the Apache site in
> BOLD letters, mod_ajp is not for production use. We see our jboss
> down with it.
I see a few references to mod_ajp from 2004 (e.g. in this thread[1])
but I guess y
Nick Kew wrote:
>> I agree with the above. I started this thread to make people aware of
>> it's existance and to provoke discussion on the matter.
>
> Yep, someone posted it a week or so back.
Yeah, me.
>> However, if someone were to take up the reigns and begin
>> developing an Apache mo
Hi,
I am trying to build Apache HTTP Server for 32 bit and 64 bit linux OS. How do
I specify the option for x86-64 bit OS.
Please let me know.
Thanks & Regards,
Aruna.
Mike Cardwell wrote:
I agree with the above. I started this thread to make people aware of
it's existance and to provoke discussion on the matter.
Yep, someone posted it a week or so back.
However, if
someone were to take up the reigns and begin developing an Apache module
for it using th
I agree with Chuck here - would definitely NOT use mod_proxy_ajp in
production and would ALWAYS use mod_jk
Back to the original question - have a look at
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/printer/apache.html - in
particular the "JkOptions +ForwardURICompat " part.
I think thi
Because we are running productions, as stated on the Apache site in BOLD
letters, mod_ajp is not for production use. We see our jboss down with it.
CHUCK PAYNE | Unix System Administrator
TRAVEL CHANNEL MEDIA
3700 Mansell Rd, Suite 500
Alpharetta, GA 30022
Office: 404-269-5533
Blackberry: 770-9
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Crypto Sal wrote:
> In the future, please bottom post to the mailing list. It makes it much
> easier to read.
>
> Here's a great article on how to see if the modulus on the private key and
> the modulus on the certificate match.
>
> http://kb.wisc.edu/middleware/
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Mike Cardwell
wrote:
> Brian Mearns wrote:
>
Just curious to know whether Google announcement on SPDY
http://blog.chromium.org/2009/11/2x-faster-web.html needs change only in
Apache web server side or even needs change in application point
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:21 PM, wrote:
> Guys,
>
> We are switching out mod_ajp for mod_jk and have ran into a wall with
> ProxyPass and ProxyPassReverse.
>
> With mod_ajp we have this setting
>
>
>
> BalancerMember ajp://tomcat05:8009 smax=20 min=0 max=10 loadfactor=1
> flushpackets=on rout
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 10:21 -0500, chuck.pa...@travelchannel.com wrote:
> Guys,
>
> We are switching out mod_ajp for mod_jk and have ran into a wall with
> ProxyPass and ProxyPassReverse.
Most people ditch mod_jk for mod_proxy_ajp.
Care to elaborate as to why mod_proxy_ajp isn't working for you
Guys,
We are switching out mod_ajp for mod_jk and have ran into a wall with
ProxyPass and ProxyPassReverse.
With mod_ajp we have this setting
BalancerMember ajp://tomcat05:8009 smax=20 min=0 max=10 loadfactor=1
flushpackets=on route=node1
BalancerMember ajp://tomcat06:8009 smax=20 min
Brian Mearns wrote:
Just curious to know whether Google announcement on SPDY
http://blog.chromium.org/2009/11/2x-faster-web.html needs change only in
Apache web server side or even needs change in application point of view
also. Sorry to spam you guys .
Both the server and
Thank you
Ricardo
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 7:43 AM, ricardo13
> wrote:
> >
> > hi,
> >
> > I have a problem.
> > I'm using mod_rewrite and mod_status.
> >
> > mod_status is configured this way.
> >
> >SetHandler server-status
> >O
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 6:15 AM, Mike Cardwell
wrote:
> Kamaraj, Jayakumar wrote:
>
>> Just curious to know whether Google announcement on SPDY
>> http://blog.chromium.org/2009/11/2x-faster-web.html needs change only in
>> Apache web server side or even needs change in application poin
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 7:43 AM, ricardo13 wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> I have a problem.
> I'm using mod_rewrite and mod_status.
>
> mod_status is configured this way.
>
> SetHandler server-status
> Order deny,allow
> Deny from all
> Allow from .your_domain.com
>
>
> When I acess http://local
hi,
I have a problem.
I'm using mod_rewrite and mod_status.
mod_status is configured this way.
SetHandler server-status
Order deny,allow
Deny from all
Allow from .your_domain.com
When I acess http://localhost/server-status I don't see the page because
mod_rewrite don't allow.
Kamaraj, Jayakumar wrote:
Just curious to know whether Google announcement on SPDY
http://blog.chromium.org/2009/11/2x-faster-web.html needs change only in
Apache web server side or even needs change in application point of view
also.
Sorry to spam you guys .
Both the s
Oliver Schoett wrote:
Some more info: the backend server sends a "TLSv1 Encrypted Alert"
spontaneously when a connection is idle for approx. 17s. The error in
the log file (with a 502 error code sent to the client) occurs when
this alert happens in response to another request being sent over
Hi,
Just curious to know whether Google announcement on SPDY
http://blog.chromium.org/2009/11/2x-faster-web.html needs change only in
Apache web server side or even needs change in application point of view
also.
Sorry to spam you guys .
Thanks,
Jai
---
Hi,
This may seems very simple, but I am not sure why we are
getting this error lines frequently in my error logs.
[Tue Nov 17 01:34:49 2009] [error] [client 64.136.3.254] Critical dirty
memory for pid 30717 [3612/79384] exceeds maximum 74997760 bytes after
42 good requests (freeing 77
22 matches
Mail list logo
