Stephen Love wrote:
Ok, now we're getting somewhere... just ENOUGH to eliminate the path
inbetween... I'd just like to ask APACHE for a unique signature of the
machine sending the message to compare it against others. Nothing
more, nothing less.
nope...
--
Norman Registered Linux user #
Stephen Love wrote:
Don't want identification. I want point to point response capability,
even if it goes away later... a way to know that I can send back to
that exact address and know it went to that particular computer
instead of randomly going all over the world. Sounds like either I
hav
Brian Mearns wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:00 PM, J. Bakshi wrote:
>
>> Brian Mearns wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:43 AM, J. Bakshi wrote:
>>>
>>>
Hello,
I have configured a personal work-space for mine in apache where I can
experiment with diffe
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:00 PM, J. Bakshi wrote:
> Brian Mearns wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:43 AM, J. Bakshi wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have configured a personal work-space for mine in apache where I can
>>> experiment with different sites and here is the configuration
>>>
>>>
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Stephen Love wrote:
> Ok, now we're getting somewhere... just ENOUGH to eliminate the path
> inbetween... I'd just like to ask APACHE for a unique signature of the
> machine sending the message to compare it against others. Nothing more,
> nothing less.
>
>
> See
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Stephen Love wrote:
>> So what you are telling me is that there IS no REAL 2-way handshaking going
>> on. Then we've lost ALL hope of security.
>>
>
> What's "REAL" in this context? It's not authenticated and
Ok, now we're getting somewhere... just ENOUGH to eliminate the path
inbetween... I'd just like to ask APACHE for a unique signature of the machine
sending the message to compare it against others. Nothing more, nothing less.
See us online at http://www.LOVEnCompany.com.
-- Original Me
Brian Mearns wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:43 AM, J. Bakshi wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have configured a personal work-space for mine in apache where I can
>> experiment with different sites and here is the configuration
>>
>>
>> Alias /personal
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 8:10 PM, vara prasad wrote:
> Hi Brian,
> I have set up Apache with mod_proxy with following config
> __
>
>
> CacheRoot d:/apache_cache
> CacheEnable disk /
> CacheDirLevels 2
> CacheDirLength 3
>
> __
> .data and .header files are stored
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Kishore Chintoju
wrote:
> I would like to disable all global proxypass rules applying in this virtual
> host? NoProxy doesn't seem to work.
Have you tried the ProxyPass syntax that uses an exclamation point?
The alternate solution would be to move your existng ru
Hi All,
*My Setup:*
My website is served from apache with jboss acting as an application server.
All of the webapp resides in jboss deployment directory. Apache talks to
jboss using ProxyPass in development and AJP protocol in production.
*My Goal:*
I want to serve all the static content (e.g.
Hi Brian,
I have set up Apache with mod_proxy with following config
__
CacheRoot d:/apache_cache
CacheEnable disk /
CacheDirLevels 2
CacheDirLength 3
__
.data and .header files are stored in cache. Is it possible to retrieve the
cached files on Apache?
Thanks
It was thus said that the Great Stephen Love once stated:
> So what you are telling me is that there IS no REAL 2-way handshaking
> going on. Then we've lost ALL hope of security.
There is a 2-way handshake, but it's at the TCP layer, which is used to
establish a reliable, stream-oriented sequen
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Stephen Love wrote:
> Don't want identification. I want point to point response capability, even
> if it goes away later... a way to know that I can send back to that exact
> address and know it went to that particular computer instead of randomly
> going all over
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Stephen Love wrote:
> So what you are telling me is that there IS no REAL 2-way handshaking going
> on. Then we've lost ALL hope of security.
>
What's "REAL" in this context? It's not authenticated and doesn't
result in some session establishment unless you confi
Don't want identification. I want point to point response capability, even if
it goes away later... a way to know that I can send back to that exact address
and know it went to that particular computer instead of randomly going all over
the world. Sounds like either I have been misinformed about
So what you are telling me is that there IS no REAL 2-way handshaking going on.
Then we've lost ALL hope of security.
See us online at http://www.LOVEnCompany.com.
-- Original Message --
From: Rich Bowen
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd]
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 20
You're getting close. I don't want ANY personal data. Just to know that it is
really them and that the next time I see them I will see the same number. I
simply want a REAL visitor and hit count. NO PERSONAL DATA of ANY KIND... just
GUARANTEED UNIQUE to the user.
See us online at http://www.LO
On 10-Nov-2009, at 13:49, André Warnier wrote:
> And I would add that, from a user point of view, I would be very reluctant to
> help at any system that would let me be identified in any way other than me
> voluntarily and knowingly providing my id by means of some obvious login page
> or certif
Mark H. Wood wrote:
...
It's thus very unlikely that you will get any help from hardware
manufacturers in identifying remote users or hosts in the manner you
specified. You'll need cooperation from your users.
And I would add that, from a user point of view, I would be very
reluctant to help
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:52:18AM -0500, Brian Mearns wrote:
> As Eric says, what you're looking for is a MAC address which is a
> universally unique identifier that every network device has (though I
> think even here, "universally unique" might have some qualifying
> conditions).
Yes. Occasion
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 1:36 PM, vara prasad wrote:
> Hi All,
> I have set up a reverse proxy www.example.com for an internal tomcat server
> http://internal:8080
> Few files are hosted on http://internal:8080.
> My requirement is when user downloads a file from http://internal:8080 using
> the
Next time i will open my eyes
Thanks a lot
On 11/10/2009 05:13 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Pruniaux Ghislain
wrote:
Hi,
Some users on my apache server need to use RewriteEngine in there directory.
They use .htaccess, but they say that does not work.
I think i m
Hi All,
I have set up a reverse proxy www.example.com for an internal tomcat server
http://internal:8080
Few files are hosted on http://internal:8080.
My requirement is when user downloads a file from http://internal:8080 using
the proxy, the proxy should cache the file with its original extensio
On Nov 10, 2009, at 08:19 , Stephen Love wrote:
I have set up a routine in my server that logs all incoming IP
addresses and parses for duplicates in the same list. HOWEVER...a
person posting almost NEVER has the same address. I believe I am not
using the actual IP Address at all. What I W
skrishnam...@bloomberg.com wrote:
Hi,
We are looking to setup SVN over apache, but it requires the use of DAV. There
are apparently security concerns over the use of DAV over apache 2.2., in the
sense that it would allow users to anonymously write content to apache, even
outside of the contex
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Pruniaux Ghislain
wrote:
> Hi,
> Some users on my apache server need to use RewriteEngine in there directory.
> They use .htaccess, but they say that does not work.
> I think i must change AllowOverride for their directory (default is none) ,
> but i could not fin
Hi,
Some users on my apache server need to use RewriteEngine in there directory.
They use .htaccess, but they say that does not work.
I think i must change AllowOverride for their directory (default is
none) , but i could not find the AllowOverride directive for the
RewriteEngine (AuthConfig,Fi
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 8:28 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Stephen Love wrote:
>> I have set up a routine in my server that logs all incoming IP addresses and
>> parses for duplicates in the same list. HOWEVER...a person posting almost
>> NEVER has the same address. I
Alright, just forget I suggested that. If in front of a html character a
byte above 127 appears (a character outside of 7 bit ASCII), the control
character would get interpreted as part of the same character in utf-8. In
other words: It WILL break.
The suggestion just sounded too good. Back to the
On 10-Nov-2009, at 08:00, skrishnam...@bloomberg.com wrote:
> We are looking to setup SVN over apache, but it requires the use of DAV.
requires? I though SVN over DAV was a particular configuration option?
> There are apparently security concerns over the use of DAV over apache 2.2.,
There are
A completely different idea to solve my actual problem:
Someone else suggested to just take out the conversions all together.
I mean, I am converting right back into the encoding I converted from. I
have been assured that no link uses a character above the first 128 (7 bit
ASCII). As far as I know
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:43 AM, J. Bakshi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have configured a personal work-space for mine in apache where I can
> experiment with different sites and here is the configuration
>
>
> Alias /personal/joydeep /var/personal_work_area/
Hi,
We are looking to setup SVN over apache, but it requires the use of DAV. There
are apparently security concerns over the use of DAV over apache 2.2., in the
sense that it would allow users to anonymously write content to apache, even
outside of the context of SVN. Are there any workarounds
>
>
> Can you get mod_diagnostics
>> output to track the data running through the filter?
>>
>> I'll try that after lunch. Ask if you want to know anything else. (I can
> for example packet sniff the connection between IE and the proxy, and give
> you the debug output of mod_proxy_html in that con
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Stephen Love wrote:
> I have set up a routine in my server that logs all incoming IP addresses and
> parses for duplicates in the same list. HOWEVER...a person posting almost
> NEVER has the same address. I believe I am not using the actual IP Address
> at all. Wha
I have set up a routine in my server that logs all incoming IP addresses and
parses for duplicates in the same list. HOWEVER...a person posting almost NEVER
has the same address. I believe I am not using the actual IP Address at all.
What I WANT is the actual SERIAL NUMBER (If you could call it
>
> On 10 Nov 2009, at 08:56, Martin Gerdes wrote:
>
> First, how slow is slow? Time from pushing the send button until the new
>> webpage is loaded rises from 10.6 to 103 seconds.
>>
>
> 10.6 is already horrendously slow (unless perhaps it's a 20-year-old PC),
> which leads me to wonder what you'
It appears that the Apache 2.2.13 connection timeout (ttl) does not work.
My client is using an Apache 2.2.13 reverse proxy to perform encryption,
compression and persistent connections with a remote site.
Every couple minutes, the following error appears in the log:
[Tue Nov 10 10:47:52 2
Hi,
what is the best way to fix the tls renegotiation problem?
On my site some locations require renegotiation to get a client cert.
But that can simply be moved into the vhost config.
I believe this is not sufficient, is it?
Is OpenSSL 0.9.8l sufficient? Or do I have to patch apache as well?
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 10:28 +0100, Martijn Moret wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have quitte some Apache httpd experience but I am not sure how to solve
> this question from my company:
>
> We have a corporate site at: http://www.example.com
> We are implementing a new webshop and our Marketing dep. deci
Hello,
I have configured a personal work-space for mine in apache where I can
experiment with different sites and here is the configuration
Alias /personal/joydeep /var/personal_work_area/joydeep
DocumentRoot /var/personal_work_area/joydeep/
On 10 Nov 2009, at 08:56, Martin Gerdes wrote:
First, how slow is slow? Time from pushing the send button until the
new webpage is loaded rises from 10.6 to 103 seconds.
10.6 is already horrendously slow (unless perhaps it's a 20-year-old
PC),
which leads me to wonder what you're doing.
Hi all,
I have quitte some Apache httpd experience but I am not sure how to solve this
question from my company:
We have a corporate site at: http://www.example.com
We are implementing a new webshop and our Marketing dep. decided om:
http://www.example.com/order
Due to the nature of the reques
Alright, xml2enc works, does not crash, and correctly translates UTF8 back
to ISO-8859-1 after it was converted to UTF-8 by mod_proxy_html.
However, activating that translation back to ISO-8859-1 makes the whole
process take up a lot of time, and I have no idea why, so I am asking for
ideas.
First
45 matches
Mail list logo
