RE: [us...@httpd] HTTP Post requests

Because the purpose of the log is to have a nicely formatted file (timestamp, url, http method, etc). The POST body could be anything. It may not even be text. Therefore the mod_jk is not going to log it. (You may ask to the mod_jk developers if there is any option to actually log the POST body,

Re: [us...@httpd] Conditional behavior by status code

Is there any way to get Apache to behave differently based on the status code, specifically apply different OutputFilters? This is With httpd-2.3/2.4, just make that a condition for FilterProvider. With 2.2, condition evaluation is more limited so you can't do that. It would be a fairly trivi

RE: [us...@httpd] HTTP Post requests

Thanks Jordiang. That's very interesting. I wonder why I won't see the body in the mod_jk logs? Any ideas... jordiang wrote: > > Yes, mod_jk will also forward POST requests. You won't see the body on the > mod_jk logs. > > -Original Message- > From: breako [mailto:alex.stave...@fineos.

Re: [us...@httpd] Conditional behavior by status code

It was thus said that the Great Brian Mearns once stated: > Is there any way to get Apache to behave differently based on the > status code, specifically apply different OutputFilters? This is > similar in concept, I believe, to AddOutputFilterByType, which relies > on the generated Content-Type he

RE: [us...@httpd] HTTP Post requests

Yes, mod_jk will also forward POST requests. You won't see the body on the mod_jk logs. -Original Message- From: breako [mailto:alex.stave...@fineos.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 1:11 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [us...@httpd] HTTP Post requests Hi, Can anybody tell

RE: [us...@httpd] AJP Ports Mod_JK

If you use mod_jk, then Apache only knows of the AJP port on Tomcat and communicates using the AJP protocol. If you use mod_proxy and mod_proxy_http then you can configure Apache to use HTTP and drop the mod_jk module. http://markmail.org/search/?q=mod_proxy+mod_jk+list%3Aorg.apache.httpd.user

Re: [us...@httpd] VirtualHost Directory Not Found

Okay. I copied a fresh default-server.conf into /etc/apache2. It has the DocumentRoot and stanzas. I added NameVirtualHost aaa.xxx.yyy.zzz:80 to it. Here is a fresh copy of the VirtualHost configuration. I turned CanonicalNames on and removed the Options and AllowOverride lines from the stat

[us...@httpd] AJP Ports Mod_JK

Hi, This is a conceptual question. I am using the Mod_JK to set up Apache to talk to Tomact. As per instructions, I put the AJP port of my tomcat in the workers.properties file for my apache. So my Apache only knows the tomcat AJP port, it does not know about Tomcat HTTP port. Or does it? Does

[us...@httpd] HTTP Post requests

Hi, Can anybody tell if Apache 2.x allows HTTP POST requests by default? I am using Apache and the Mod_JK plugin to forward requests to a configured tomcat server. It fowards GETS requests okay but does forwrad the POST requests. I check the mod_jk logs and I can see it trying to forward the POS

[us...@httpd] Certificates Revocation Lists and Apache...

Hi, I need a little help with Certificate Revocation Lists. I did setup client certificates filtering with apache and it seem to work fine so far (used a tutorial on http://www.adone.info/?p=4, down right now). I have a "CA" that is signing a "CA SSL". Then, the "CA SSL" is signing the clients ce

Re: [us...@httpd] LDAP: ldap_set_option failed. Could not set LDAP_OPT_X_TLS to LDAP_OPT_X_TLS_HARD

Eric Covener wrote: On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote: Sandro Tosi wrote: Hello, we are enabling LDAP auth on our apache stack. Starting from apache/2.2.9+php/5.2.8 we are upgrading to apache/2.2.14+php/5.2.11 . Just to give more information in order to (hopefu

Re: [us...@httpd] LDAP: ldap_set_option failed. Could not set LDAP_OPT_X_TLS to LDAP_OPT_X_TLS_HARD

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Sandro Tosi wrote: >> >> Hello, >> we are enabling LDAP auth on our apache stack. Starting from >> apache/2.2.9+php/5.2.8 we are upgrading to apache/2.2.14+php/5.2.11 . >> > > Just to give more information in order to (hopefully) solve this, the

Re: [us...@httpd] LDAP: ldap_set_option failed. Could not set LDAP_OPT_X_TLS to LDAP_OPT_X_TLS_HARD

Sandro Tosi wrote: Hello, we are enabling LDAP auth on our apache stack. Starting from apache/2.2.9+php/5.2.8 we are upgrading to apache/2.2.14+php/5.2.11 . Just to give more information in order to (hopefully) solve this, the same problem happens also using apache 2.2.9 (recompiled to ena

[us...@httpd] Conditional behavior by status code

Is there any way to get Apache to behave differently based on the status code, specifically apply different OutputFilters? This is similar in concept, I believe, to AddOutputFilterByType, which relies on the generated Content-Type header to determine what filter to apply. But I want to apply differ

[us...@httpd] read-only balancer-manager

Can anyone think of a way that I can present the /balancer-manager interface (from mod_proxy_balancer), without allowing the dynamic reconfiguration part to be used? I'd like to offer a read-only view of the load-balancer status to some analysts, without allowing them to reconfigure things or dis

Re: [us...@httpd] IBM HTTP Server admin console

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Vamshikrishna T wrote: > Hi All, > Accessing IBM http server 7.0 admin console ‘http://localhost:8008’ after > default installation of IHS is giving HTTP 404 ‘Page not found’ error. As > IBM Http server internally uses Apache only, Can someone help me on this? Try

[us...@httpd] IBM HTTP Server admin console

Hi All, Accessing IBM http server 7.0 admin console 'http://localhost:8008' after default installation of IHS is giving HTTP 404 'Page not found' error. As IBM Http server internally uses Apache only, Can someone help me on this? Thanks and Regards, Vamshi

Re: [us...@httpd] LDAP: ldap_set_option failed. Could not set LDAP_OPT_X_TLS to LDAP_OPT_X_TLS_HARD

Hello Eric (and others), do you have any other ideas about what I can look or test about this issue? I'm really out of ideas and I don't know what else to do. Thanks a lot in advance, Sandro Sandro Tosi wrote: Eric Covener wrote: On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote: