On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 8:59 PM, HE Hongmei
wrote:
>
> We added some logs before and after the above calls, and found the
> content-type is always right. However, sometimes (not always), in the
> response sent by Apache server, Content-Type will be changed to
> something like "application/user-con
We developed an Apache module. In the module, when we sent HTTP
response, Apache always changed the "Content-Type", sometimes this field
is correct, sometime it is truncated, sometimes with an invalid value.
We sent response back with the following function, and the response
header was always se
Eric Covener wrote:
If the files listed in DirectoryIndex aren't found
(http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_dir.html#directoryindex),
and your effective value of the Options directive includes "Indexes"
(http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/core.html#options), then this
module shows you a d
If the files listed in DirectoryIndex aren't found
(http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_dir.html#directoryindex),
and your effective value of the Options directive includes "Indexes"
(http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/core.html#options), then this
module shows you a directory listing:
http
At 12:45 -0700 10/23/09, Jonathan Zuckerman wrote:
>On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Doug McNutt wrote:
>> GET requests which would otherwise look for an index.html file but are set
>> up with something like this:
>>
>> HTTP://domain.com/somedirectory/?C=xx;O=yy
>>
>> seem to reply with a format
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Doug McNutt wrote:
> GET requests which would otherwise look for an index.html file but are set up
> with something like this:
>
> HTTP://domain.com/somedirectory/?C=xx;O=yy
>
> seem to reply with a formatted list of directory contents. Can someone point
> me t
GET requests which would otherwise look for an index.html file but are set up
with something like this:
HTTP://domain.com/somedirectory/?C=xx;O=yy
seem to reply with a formatted list of directory contents. Can someone point
me to some documentation for that? Googling for "?C=M;O=a" gets hundr
Have anyone every tried to proxy a request to multiple servers and responding
the request from a particular server.
The reason why I ask, it would be cool to be able to split product requests,
duplicate the requests and send them of to a test farm but dont use the test
farm response.
Any ideas
>The one thing that concerns me from an Apache point of view
>is that upgrading from 2.2.x to 2.2.later-x shouldn't break
>your applications. Even third-party binaries, provided they
>use only public APIs and don't access private interfaces.
>So it would indeed be good to know what's changed in yo
Hickey, Tom wrote:
Yes this is related to a question I posted on another thread and I understand
that SOAPISAP.dll is not an Apache product. But again I am trying to determine
why this DLL works with version 2.2.4 and not with 2.2.14. The DLL has not
changed, I am using the same DLL so somet
Andre
Per your questions
Yes I added ScriptLog "logs/cgi_log.log" to httpd.conf but no file is created.
I agree that "HSE_REQ_GET_IMPERSONATION_TOKEN is not supported" is pretty
self-explanatory but from what I can tell HSE_REQ_GET_IMPERSONATION_TOKEN had
never been supported by win32/mod_isapi
Thanks owen!!
2009/10/23 Boyle Owen
> I'm not familiar with your linux distro, but I suspect that
> /usr/sbin/apache2 is the apache binary and that by starting it directly
> you get a default config (do "/usr/sbin/apache2 -V" to find out where).
>
> On the other hand, /etc/init.d/apache2 is pro
Tom,
1) did you try : http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_cgi.html#scriptlog
(The idea is : if Apache really is seeing this dll as a cgi application,
then maybe it also logs data about the request and the response, which
might help. Or not, but without trying, it is difficult to say.)
2
Yes this is related to a question I posted on another thread and I understand
that SOAPISAP.dll is not an Apache product. But again I am trying to determine
why this DLL works with version 2.2.4 and not with 2.2.14. The DLL has not
changed, I am using the same DLL so something in Apache has ch
Hickey, Tom wrote:
Andre
Thank you for your comments but I felt pretty confident stating that it was not
a script problem because I do not have any scripts in my cgi directory. The
actual issue is a security issue on my WIN XP box:
[Thu Oct 22 11:02:56 2009] [warn] [client 192.168.0.3] ISAPI:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 8:19 AM, David Balažic wrote:
> (running xampp-1.7.1 on Windows XP Pro SP3)
>
That's not developed here at the Apache Software Foundation.
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
-
The official User-To-User
Hi!
(running xampp-1.7.1 on Windows XP Pro SP3)
I just run xampp-control.exe and it shows a dialog:
---
XAMPP Control
---
ERROR: XAMPP is already running
---
OK Cancel
---
A few items:
- both OK a
Andre
Thank you for your comments but I felt pretty confident stating that it was not
a script problem because I do not have any scripts in my cgi directory. The
actual issue is a security issue on my WIN XP box:
[Thu Oct 22 11:02:56 2009] [warn] [client 192.168.0.3] ISAPI:
ServerSupportFuncti
Hickey, Tom wrote:
Thanks Nick, I did Google the error and it pointed me to possible errors in my scripts but I verified there wasn't a problem there.
Try :
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_cgi.html#scriptlog
A "Premature end of scripts headers" *is* your cgi-bin script crashing
or se
I'm not familiar with your linux distro, but I suspect that
/usr/sbin/apache2 is the apache binary and that by starting it directly
you get a default config (do "/usr/sbin/apache2 -V" to find out where).
On the other hand, /etc/init.d/apache2 is probably a shell-script that
defines a different co
20 matches
Mail list logo
