[us...@httpd] apache modules

Hi I have one question about Apache modules.with loading more modules on apache, may apache responses with more delay ?? -- N.Chavoshi

[us...@httpd] apache monitoring

Hi I want to monitor apache status (amount of requests,ram usage,amount of apache daemons and etc)as real time, Is there any tools that justify these needs? thanks for any help or guidance -- N.Chavoshi

[us...@httpd] Apache under DOS

Hi Recently attackers use new attack for DOS apache.for example see http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=6601&rss . Is there any solution for prevent this DOS attack? what solution do you suggest for limit concurrent connection? thanks for any help or guidance -- N.Chavoshi

Re: [us...@httpd] Redirecting htaccess over SSL, then back to port 80?

On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Paul Reilly wrote: > I don't want to force all web access over HTTPS, just the .htaccess > authentication. Assuming you're doing standard HTTP Authentication, it doesn't work that way. Once you get the login popup, every subsequent request by the browser sends th

[us...@httpd] Redirecting htaccess over SSL, then back to port 80?

Hello, Is there a recommended solution for redirecting clients which need to authenticate for .htacess to a secure version of the URL, and then following succesful authentiction, redirecting them back to the normal (port 80) URL ? I've seen code like the following SSLOpt

Re: AW: [us...@httpd] mod_proxy_balance: route redirect not working

juergen.l...@it.nrw.de wrote: André, thanks for your suggestion. I was using mod_jk a while ago, but was persuaded to switch to mod_proxy. I'm going to build a test env with mod_jk by the end of this week and keep you informed. For additional info, I strongly recommend having a look at the Tom

Re: [us...@httpd] Passing REMOTE_USER from reverse proxy to app server

On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 14:47 +0100, Nick Kew wrote: > Tom Evans wrote: > > > [chop] > > That rewrite stuff happens before authentication. > You would need to put your rewriterules inside a > to activate them after it's happened. > Isn't that the point of %{LA-U:FOO}, to do a subrequest to get a

[us...@httpd] Re: Passing REMOTE_USER from reverse proxy to app server

On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 14:42 +0100, Tom Evans wrote: > Hi all > > httpd 2.2.11, prefork MPM, FreeBSD 7.2 > > I'm trying to pass the REMOTE_USER variable, as determined by the > reverse proxy, to a backend application server. The main reason to do > this is to offload authnz to the proxy, and to ke

AW: [us...@httpd] mod_proxy_balance: route redirect not working

Owen, thanks for your answers. The balancing stuff is documented very sparsely. Does anyone have an idea of what this feature is about? Seems to be some kind of dedicated failover strategy, but I can't imagine a use case for that. Cheers Jürgen > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Boyle O

AW: [us...@httpd] mod_proxy_balance: route redirect not working

André, thanks for your suggestion. I was using mod_jk a while ago, but was persuaded to switch to mod_proxy. I'm going to build a test env with mod_jk by the end of this week and keep you informed. Cheers, Jürgen > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]

Re: [us...@httpd] Passing REMOTE_USER from reverse proxy to app server

Tom Evans wrote: [chop] That rewrite stuff happens before authentication. You would need to put your rewriterules inside a to activate them after it's happened. -- Nick Kew - The official User-To-User support forum of the A

[us...@httpd] Passing REMOTE_USER from reverse proxy to app server

Hi all httpd 2.2.11, prefork MPM, FreeBSD 7.2 I'm trying to pass the REMOTE_USER variable, as determined by the reverse proxy, to a backend application server. The main reason to do this is to offload authnz to the proxy, and to keep all this centralised in one place. The authn module that will a

[us...@httpd] Apache 2 slow response to LanDesk Downloader

Hello, I've an Apache2 serving as "file server" for LanDesk Management suite. I'm having trouble with Apache when used by LanDesk client because of such a strange behaviour: the client makes tons of small requests for downloading a big file and the server, even if unloaded, respond too slow. The si

Re: [us...@httpd] mod_proxy_balance: route redirect not working

Boyle Owen wrote: -Original Message- From: juergen.l...@it.nrw.de [mailto:juergen.l...@it.nrw.de] If redirection in mod_proxy_balance does not work this way, what is the preferred way to smoothly fade out an instance? I don't know. Hi Juergen. You may want to have a look at using

RE: [us...@httpd] mod_proxy_balance: route redirect not working

> -Original Message- > From: juergen.l...@it.nrw.de [mailto:juergen.l...@it.nrw.de] > Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 9:52 AM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: AW: [us...@httpd] mod_proxy_balance: route redirect > not working > > Owen, > what exactly does "labelled" mean? containing

[us...@httpd] Vulnerabilities in OpenSSL

Hello, I noticed the announcement of some vulnerabilities in OpenSSL: CVE-2009-0590, CVE-2009-0591 and CVE-2009-0789. Solution would be to upgrade to 0.9.8k. But I'm using the binary distribution of Apache (2.0.63 with OpenSSL 0.9.7m) and there is no newer one available. I don't want to switch

AW: [us...@httpd] mod_proxy_balance: route redirect not working

Owen, what exactly does "labelled" mean? Can I think of it in our case as the request having a cookie JSESSIONID=.tomcat1, i.e. a suffix matching one of the configured workers? If so, we completely misinterpreted the meaning of "redirect". We are looking for a way to starve an instance: matching

RE: [us...@httpd] mod_proxy_balance: route redirect not working

From: juergen.l...@it.nrw.de [mailto:juergen.l...@it.nrw.de] Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 5:29 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [us...@httpd] mod_proxy_balance: route redirect not working We use mod_pr