On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Viaduct Productions
wrote:
> Sure. I'll make it dead simple for you: Why does this happen?
>
> sh-3.2# apachectl -S
> [Tue Apr 14 04:53:49 2009] [warn] NameVirtualHost *:80 has no VirtualHosts
> VirtualHost configuration:
> wildcard NameVirtualHosts and _default
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Alessandro Fantuzzi wrote:
> In server.xml I created two Hosts
You don't need to do this in an apache + tomcat config. Just have one
tomcat host, with the two webapps in separate contexts, and let apache
handle the virtual hosts.
Krist
--
krist.vanbes...@gm
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Aaron Turner wrote:
> Nobody has any ideas???
>
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Aaron Turner wrote:
>> At first I thought this was a problem with my python/fastcgi config,
>> but now I've noticed that php5 apps like Wordpress can't resolve hosts
>> either. Res
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 3:32 PM, ricardo13 wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have other doubt about mod_rewrite.
>
> Have this line in httpd.conf:
>
> RewriteEngine on
> RewriteRule ^/index/([0-9]+)/$ /index.html?id=$1
>
> When type "http://localhost/index.html?id=11"; it doesn't show URL
> "http://localho
There is about 10 source ips firing onto my server. All of them are dynamic
dsl accounts; the only effective way to stop them was to block the all ip
ranges of their isp.
The problem was solved:
1. Apache connection limits increased dramatically and
2. FINALLY(!!!) configured iptables to recogni
Yes, that's it. My current experience with Linux iptables was not enough for
define reliable rules against synflood'ing. All my other servers are either
OpenBSD itself or located behind OpenBSD's PF which provides effective
flooding protection.
The problem was solved by adding appropriate rules to
Heh, thanks for the tip. Of course, I've tried to apply MaxConnPerIP to
particular location used by affected virtual host, with no success. Please
check my previous reply that contains my explanations and assumption about
the reasons why mod-limitipconn seems to be useless ;)
-Ursprüngliche N
You need to make sure that your html files are parsed by the php parser, find
the line in http.conf and add .html (if this Is safe for your server)
Or
Simple chane the rewrite rule to read index.php?id=
This is all assuming you have php code that uses $_GET['id'] to construct the
page
Sent fr
Kanstantin Reznichak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thank you for reply. Unfortunately, mod-limitipconn seems to act too late.
> After installing and enabling it:
>
> MaxConnPerIP 15
>
Read what you wrote. Location / - you are asking apache to do nothing
until it has torn apart the request and figured
It was thus said that the Great Kanstantin Reznichak once stated:
> Hello,
>
> Thank you for reply. Unfortunately, mod-limitipconn seems to act too late.
> After installing and enabling it:
>
> MaxConnPerIP 15
>
>
> Netstat shows:
> # netstat -atn
> Active Internet connections (servers and es
ricardo13 wrote:
Hi all,
I have other doubt about mod_rewrite.
Have this line in httpd.conf:
RewriteEngine on
RewriteRule ^/index/([0-9]+)/$ /index.html?id=$1
When type "http://localhost/index.html?id=11"; it doesn't show URL
"http://localhost/index/11/";
I saw this example in a site.
Th
Viaduct Productions wrote:
On 14-Apr-09, at 11:38 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
httpd -S and mod_info are your friends in these sorts of issues.
Yes, I've been chasing up the issue found in apachectl -S since using
it. That's what the thread is focussing on now.
Ok, there we are touch
Hi all,
I have other doubt about mod_rewrite.
Have this line in httpd.conf:
RewriteEngine on
RewriteRule ^/index/([0-9]+)/$ /index.html?id=$1
When type "http://localhost/index.html?id=11"; it doesn't show URL
"http://localhost/index/11/";
I saw this example in a site.
What's happen ???
Ricar
Thank you !!
Ricardo
Brian Mearns-2 wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 1:43 PM, ricardo13
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This line "RewriteRule ^/index.html$ new.html" shows error.
>> But "RewriteRule /index.html$ new.html" sucess !!!
>>
>> And if I put the follow:
>> RewriteRule ^/test.html$
Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> On Apr 14, 2009, at 06:19, Viaduct Productions wrote:
>
> > Or would you rather me ask a question that doesn't shed light on issues?
> > Kind of like "only behave the way we wish"? Then why have a list? You
> > want approval? Get a dog. I'm here because things are not
Kanstantin Reznichak wrote:
The script from my first post send the single "GET / HTTP 1.1" line,
followed by . The request is incomplete so mod_limitipconn seems to
wait until client complete the request headers block (by sending
) in order to reject the request: RFC-conform behaviour, but
absolu
The script from my first post send the single "GET / HTTP 1.1" line,
followed by . The request is incomplete so mod_limitipconn seems to
wait until client complete the request headers block (by sending
) in order to reject the request: RFC-conform behaviour, but
absolutely useless in this case. Tha
On Apr 14, 2009, at 06:19, Viaduct Productions wrote:
Or would you rather me ask a question that doesn't shed light on
issues? Kind of like "only behave the way we wish"? Then why have
a list? You want approval? Get a dog. I'm here because things are
not clear. Yes, it's a list for u
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 1:43 PM, ricardo13 wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> This line "RewriteRule ^/index.html$ new.html" shows error.
> But "RewriteRule /index.html$ new.html" sucess !!!
>
> And if I put the follow:
> RewriteRule ^/test.html$ index.html
>
> But I haven't test.html !!! What's happen ???
>
Kanstantin Reznichak wrote:
Hello,
Thank you for reply. Unfortunately, mod-limitipconn seems to act too late.
After installing and enabling it:
MaxConnPerIP 15
Netstat shows:
# netstat -atn
Active Internet connections (servers and established)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address For
Hi all,
This line "RewriteRule ^/index.html$ new.html" shows error.
But "RewriteRule /index.html$ new.html" sucess !!!
And if I put the follow:
RewriteRule ^/test.html$ index.html
But I haven't test.html !!! What's happen ???
Ricardo
Rodrigo-57 wrote:
>
> Try with
> RewriteRule ^/inde
Hello,
Thank you for reply. Unfortunately, mod-limitipconn seems to act too late.
After installing and enabling it:
MaxConnPerIP 15
Netstat shows:
# netstat -atn
Active Internet connections (servers and established)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State
tcp
Try with
RewriteRule ^/index.html$ new.html
2009/4/14 ricardo13
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm doing some tests with module rewrite (mod_rewrite), but I'm have
> problems.
> I typed the follow in http.conf:
>
>
> RewriteEngine on
> RewriteRule ^index.html$ new.html
>
>
> When I type in browser localho
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Aaron Turner wrote:
> Nobody has any ideas???
>
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Aaron Turner wrote:
>> At first I thought this was a problem with my python/fastcgi config,
>> but now I've noticed that php5 apps like Wordpress can't resolve hosts
>> either. Re
On 14-Apr-09, at 11:38 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
httpd -S and mod_info are your friends in these sorts of issues.
Yes, I've been chasing up the issue found in apachectl -S since using
it. That's what the thread is focussing on now.
Rich in Toronto
...now go get on your bike
-
Viaduct Productions wrote:
>
> On 14-Apr-09, at 8:18 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
>
>>> [Tue Apr 14 06:05:15 2009] [warn] NameVirtualHost *:80 has no
>>> VirtualHosts
>>>
>>
>> Which does NOT say "Apache has no vhosts". You may be misunderstanding
>> what the message says.
>
> May, may not, perhaps...he
Nobody has any ideas???
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Aaron Turner wrote:
> At first I thought this was a problem with my python/fastcgi config,
> but now I've noticed that php5 apps like Wordpress can't resolve hosts
> either. Resolving hosts works just fine on the command line via the
> "ho
On 14-Apr-09, at 11:16 AM, Dan Poirier wrote:
Leopard uses launchctl to run daemons. Unless you've played with its
apache configuration, it's probably fine.
I haven't touched it. I wouldn't even know how to go near it. I had
a quick look and it's encrypted somewhat anyway.
The config f
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 07:49 -0700, ricardo13 wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm doing some tests with module rewrite (mod_rewrite), but I'm have
> problems.
> I typed the follow in http.conf:
>
>
> RewriteEngine on
> RewriteRule ^index.html$ new.html
>
>
> When I type in browser localhost/inde
Leopard uses launchctl to run daemons. Unless you've played with its
apache configuration, it's probably fine.
The config files are all in /private/etc/apache2. If you could zip that
up and put it somewhere online, people could look at it directly, which
might save a lot of back and forth.
--
Hi all,
I'm doing some tests with module rewrite (mod_rewrite), but I'm have
problems.
I typed the follow in http.conf:
RewriteEngine on
RewriteRule ^index.html$ new.html
When I type in browser localhost/index.html don't happen nothing. I have
file index.html and new.html !!!
What's happe
Mac OS X Leopard Client. It automatically starts up, as configured in
Sys Prefs.
Apache 2.2.9
Unfortunately I cannot find any init.d anywhere. Apple changed to
xinetd and I can't find that either. I don't know where to look for
this. I put a message out on another list, so if I find an
André Warnier ha scritto:
Check #1:
Presumably, you have Tomcat right now configured so that if you
request "http://www.company.com:8080/site_prod"; or
"http://www.company.com:8080/site_admin";, it calls the corresponding
application, right ?
Correct
Check #2:
I will also suppose that the
Viaduct Productions wrote:
On 14-Apr-09, at 9:45 AM, André Warnier wrote:
a) a first "NameVirtualHost *:80" somewhere,
and then
b) a second "NameVirtualHost *:80" line, without having seen
in-between, sections that would correspond to the first
"NameVirtualHost *:80".
So it warns you that
On 14-Apr-09, at 9:45 AM, André Warnier wrote:
a) a first "NameVirtualHost *:80" somewhere,
and then
b) a second "NameVirtualHost *:80" line, without having seen in-
between, sections that would correspond to the first
"NameVirtualHost *:80".
So it warns you that something is missing there
Viaduct Productions wrote:
[...]
As much as by now the subject has become inappropriate, if you change it
in the middle, it becomes very hard for people to follow.
So I'll restore the original one.
By marking [OT], I was talking about the other discussion about how bad
Apache and the documentat
On 14-Apr-09, at 8:34 AM, André Warnier wrote:
For the other part of the discussion, I suggest prefixing the
subject with [OT] (marking as "off topic".
About the issue at hand :
Just for the sake of it, to the previous configuration on my server,
I added an extra (thus, in my case, duplica
On 14-Apr-09, at 8:18 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
[Tue Apr 14 06:05:15 2009] [warn] NameVirtualHost *:80 has no
VirtualHosts
Which does NOT say "Apache has no vhosts". You may be misunderstanding
what the message says.
May, may not, perhaps...hence the request for documentation.
2. 13 virtua
Viaduct Productions wrote:
I'm using wildcard *:80, for both NameVirtualHost and VirtualHost
entries, and I only have one NVH. I've checked many times, thinking I
tripped over something.
For the other part of the discussion, I suggest prefixing the subject
with [OT] (marking as "off topic".
On 14-Apr-09, at 8:14 AM, Jacqui Caren wrote:
This is whining - it gets you nowhere. Apache httpd has excellent
documentation
and you can purchase some rather good books as well.
Your opinion. My opinion is what I posted. If things were unclear as
I suggested, then other members' posts
On 14-Apr-09, at 8:15 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
I have no idea what this is in reply to. All I've said in this thread
is that the users list is not required as you asserted.
Note that If you choose not to avail yourself of the users list, you
obviously can't just move your usage questions over t
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 07:29 -0400, Viaduct Productions wrote:
> On 14-Apr-09, at 7:00 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
>
> > I'm slightly confused, as the thread title says 'LocationMatch inside
> > VirtualHost', which doesn't seem related?
>
> When I inserted the LocationMatch inside the VirtualHost directi
Viaduct Productions wrote:
On 14-Apr-09, at 7:15 AM, André Warnier wrote:
It is maybe worth remembering that you get this software for free, as
you are getting assistance for free on this users list. It is always
an option to pay someone to offer you personal and tailored assistance
and trai
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 7:48 AM, Viaduct Productions
wrote:
>
> On 14-Apr-09, at 7:42 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
>
>> Not at all, my statement had nothing to do with documentation or
>> feedback. You removed the asinine statement I was replying to:
>>
>>> It would be in everybody's interest if the w
On 14-Apr-09, at 7:42 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
Not at all, my statement had nothing to do with documentation or
feedback. You removed the asinine statement I was replying to:
It would be in everybody's interest if the whole system didn't
require users to come to the users list. It's not lik
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Viaduct Productions
wrote:
>
> On 14-Apr-09, at 7:29 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
>
>> It's not required. You can join IRC, phone a friend, pay for
>> commercial support, or figure it out on your own.
>
> Or ask on a list. Hence the question.
>
> So you openly admit th
On 14-Apr-09, at 7:29 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
It's not required. You can join IRC, phone a friend, pay for
commercial support, or figure it out on your own.
Or ask on a list. Hence the question.
So you openly admit there are shortcomings in the documentation and
feedback. That's why peop
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Viaduct Productions
wrote:
> It would be in everybody's interest if the whole system didn't require users
> to come to the users list. It's not like I don't have things to do, as I'm
> assuming yourselves as well.
It's not required. You can join IRC, phone a fri
On 14-Apr-09, at 7:00 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
I'm slightly confused, as the thread title says 'LocationMatch inside
VirtualHost', which doesn't seem related?
When I inserted the LocationMatch inside the VirtualHost directive, I
was getting errors as reported.
Observation (again, making it
On 14-Apr-09, at 7:15 AM, André Warnier wrote:
It is maybe worth remembering that you get this software for free,
as you are getting assistance for free on this users list. It is
always an option to pay someone to offer you personal and tailored
assistance and training.
You know, this i
I'm using wildcard *:80, for both NameVirtualHost and VirtualHost
entries, and I only have one NVH. I've checked many times, thinking I
tripped over something.
On 14-Apr-09, at 7:24 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
The warning usuallu means you have more then one "nameVirtualHost
*:80". It shoul
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 4:51 AM, Miha Verlic wrote:
> Hello,
>
> lately I noticed that our web servers don't answer to a request from time to
> time. I created a dummy http checking script every few seconds to debug a
> problem. It seems that server does not even respond with SYNACK packet. Here
>
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 6:19 AM, Viaduct Productions
wrote:
> [Tue Apr 14 04:53:49 2009] [warn] NameVirtualHost *:80 has no VirtualHosts
> VirtualHost configuration:
> wildcard NameVirtualHosts and _default_ servers:
> *:80 is a NameVirtualHost
> So 0 == 13. Also, 0 == 13 is
Viaduct Productions wrote:
On 14-Apr-09, at 4:57 AM, André Warnier wrote:
So would you like to try again ?
Sure. I'll make it dead simple for you: Why does this happen?
sh-3.2# apachectl -S
[Tue Apr 14 04:53:49 2009] [warn] NameVirtualHost *:80 has no VirtualHosts
VirtualHost configuratio
I'm slightly confused, as the thread title says 'LocationMatch inside
VirtualHost', which doesn't seem related?
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 06:19 -0400, Viaduct Productions wrote:
> On 14-Apr-09, at 4:57 AM, André Warnier wrote:
>
> > So would you like to try again ?
>
>
> Sure. I'll make it dead si
I fixed it somehow, by messing with virtualhost conf files, but an
ongoing issue.
On 14-Apr-09, at 5:57 AM, Arnab Ganguly wrote:
Generate the core dump file.It will tell you the reason for
segmentation fault.Refer to the Apache documentation as how it can
be done.
Thanks and regards
On 14-Apr-09, at 4:57 AM, André Warnier wrote:
So would you like to try again ?
Sure. I'll make it dead simple for you: Why does this happen?
sh-3.2# apachectl -S
[Tue Apr 14 04:53:49 2009] [warn] NameVirtualHost *:80 has no
VirtualHosts
VirtualHost configuration:
wildcard NameVirtualHo
Generate the core dump file.It will tell you the reason for segmentation
fault.Refer to the Apache documentation as how it can be done.
Thanks and regards
Arnab
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Viaduct Productions <
li...@viaduct-productions.com> wrote:
> Hi folks.
>
> I have received the followi
Viaduct Productions wrote:
OK I found the culprit.
Who do I report a bug to? It seems including a file with same
permissions inside the users/ directory, won't work.
Even if you include it right after the extra/httpd-vhosts.conf file with
the very same syntax, it won't work.
There's nothi
Hello,
lately I noticed that our web servers don't answer to a request from
time to time. I created a dummy http checking script every few seconds
to debug a problem. It seems that server does not even respond with
SYNACK packet. Here is the excerpt from wireshark/tcpdump log:
# failed reque
OK I found the culprit.
Who do I report a bug to? It seems including a file with same
permissions inside the users/ directory, won't work.
Even if you include it right after the extra/httpd-vhosts.conf file
with the very same syntax, it won't work.
There's nothing in the documentation, o
Hi.
Probably nothing to do with your problem, and I am not quite sure it
really matters because I have not analysed your configuration in detail,
but in principle ...
This line
DocumentRoot /d01/tomcat/webapps/zeABC
means that you are allowing Apache to serve the files that are below
that di
62 matches
Mail list logo
