Re: [us...@httpd] Semantics of "RewriteOptions inherit" in htaccess files needs improvement

2009-02-01 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 23:19 +0100, Bob Ionescu wrote: > 2009/1/31 Matt McCutchen : > > #1. Currently, "RewriteOptions inherit" works as if the parent's rules > > were copied and pasted into the child (after any other rules). This > > means that requests in the child directory are tested against th

Re: [us...@httpd] Re: Help - Name Server - Maybe

2009-02-01 Thread Razi Khaja
> > A question for the port forwarding in Applications & Games. It asks for > "application" I put Apache2.2 in the box, was that right or what does go > there? > You can put anything you want in the "application" box, I think its just there to be a helpful reminder of what your port forwarding.

Re: [us...@httpd] Re: Help - Name Server - Maybe

2009-02-01 Thread Michael Rogers
Razi! A question for the port forwarding in Applications & Games. It asks for "application" I put Apache2.2 in the box, was that right or what does go there? From: Razi Khaja Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 5:19 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Re: Help - Name

Re: [us...@httpd] Re: Help - Name Server - Maybe

2009-02-01 Thread Razi Khaja
> > > I also would like to know what goes into the httpd.config file: > > # ServerName gives the name and port that the server uses to identify > itself. > # This can often be determined automatically, but we recommend you specify > # it explicitly to prevent problems during startup. > # > # If you

[us...@httpd] Re: Help - Name Server - Maybe

2009-02-01 Thread Nicholas Sherlock
Michael Rogers wrote: Eric! You get to my modem. take a look at the attachment. What if in the Destination LAN I type in 10.0.0.115 (the IP of my server) the sub mask and gateway. In the httpd.config file I change whatever I have there to michaelsrogers.com. would that work? No, that'

[us...@httpd] Re: Help - Name Server - Maybe

2009-02-01 Thread Nicholas Sherlock
Michael Rogers wrote: I don't know how you are getting the .com name to resolve to 66.133.46.108 as that is my modem, I can't get it do do that. I tried disabling the DHCP on the computer that is acting as server, and did switch to static IP in the TCP/IP settings, but then I couldn't access

Re: [us...@httpd] Re: Help - Name Server - Maybe

2009-02-01 Thread Michael Rogers
Razi! I need to tend to a medical problem first before I work on this more. That should not take me more then 45 minutes to an hour. meanwhile I would ask you to look at advanced routing in the linksys I also would like to know what goes into the httpd.config file: # ServerName gives the na

Re: [us...@httpd] Re: Help - Name Server - Maybe

2009-02-01 Thread Michael Rogers
Windows XP home SP3 From: André Warnier Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 3:37 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Re: Help - Name Server - Maybe Don't know about Eric, but I get : Unable to connect Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at www.m

Re: [us...@httpd] Re: Help - Name Server - Maybe

2009-02-01 Thread Razi Khaja
> > Mt router is a linksys WRT54G. > Great! Thats the one I use, so this should be easy. First determine the ip number of the computer running the apache web server (your apache server) by running ipconfig \all on the command line. Next log in to your router, go to "Applications & Gaming" -> DMZ

Re: [us...@httpd] Capturing server response

2009-02-01 Thread André Warnier
Eric Covener wrote: On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Solutio at Gmail wrote: Gotcha. I haven't had to do that before, but I am sure I will figure that out. We will try this solution as well as setting up a proxy, to see which will have the least impact on the overall performance. Thanks heaps.

Re: [us...@httpd] Re: Help - Name Server - Maybe

2009-02-01 Thread Michael Rogers
Mt router is a linksys WRT54G. From: Razi Khaja Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 1:33 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Re: Help - Name Server - Maybe I don't know how you are getting the .com name to resolve to 66.133.46.108 as that is my modem, I can't get i

Re: [us...@httpd] Re: Help - Name Server - Maybe

2009-02-01 Thread André Warnier
Don't know about Eric, but I get : Unable to connect Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at www.michaelsrogers.com. * The site could be temporarily unavailable or too busy. Try again in a few moments. which is, at the moment, to be expected... ;-) By the way, is your s

Re: [us...@httpd] Capturing server response

2009-02-01 Thread Eric Covener
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Solutio at Gmail wrote: > Gotcha. I haven't had to do that before, but I am sure I will figure that > out. We will try this solution as well as setting up a proxy, to see which > will have the least impact on the overall performance. Thanks heaps. Maybe mod_disk_ca

Re: [us...@httpd] Re: Help - Name Server - Maybe

2009-02-01 Thread André Warnier
Eric Covener wrote: [...] FWIW It's quite common to not be able to access your webserver with it's external IP address from within your LAN. Allright, I'll try to help. This has not much to do with Apache, and more with basic TCP/IP. So let's start at the beginning. First your internal

Re: [us...@httpd] Re: Help - Name Server - Maybe

2009-02-01 Thread Eric Covener
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Michael Rogers wrote: > Eric! > > I have restarted my computer that has the Apache on it. try > http://www.michaelsrogers.com and see what you get. I'll leave it no the > rest of the day and until noon tomorrow. Connecting to www.michaelsrogers.com|66.113.46.108|

Re: [us...@httpd] Re: Help - Name Server - Maybe

2009-02-01 Thread Michael Rogers
Eric! I have restarted my computer that has the Apache on it. try http://www.michaelsrogers.com and see what you get. I'll leave it no the rest of the day and until noon tomorrow. From: Eric Covener Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 2:31 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [us.

Re: [us...@httpd] Semantics of "RewriteOptions inherit" in htaccess files needs improvement

2009-02-01 Thread Bob Ionescu
2009/1/31 Matt McCutchen : > #1. Currently, "RewriteOptions inherit" works as if the parent's rules > were copied and pasted into the child (after any other rules). This > means that requests in the child directory are tested against the > parent's rules after stripping the /child's/ RewriteBase.

Re: [us...@httpd] Capturing server response

2009-02-01 Thread Solutio at Gmail
Thanks again for your help. It would have taken me countless hours to get to this point on my own... -- From: "André Warnier" Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 2:41 PM To: Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Capturing server response Solutio at Gmail wrot

Re: [us...@httpd] Re: Help - Name Server - Maybe

2009-02-01 Thread Eric Covener
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Razi Khaja wrote: >> I don't know how you are getting the .com name to resolve to 66.133.46.108 >> as that is my modem, I can't get it do do that. I tried disabling the DHCP >> on the computer that is acting as server, and did switch to static IP in the >> TCP/IP s

Re: [us...@httpd] Capturing server response

2009-02-01 Thread André Warnier
Solutio at Gmail wrote: Gotcha. I haven't had to do that before, but I am sure I will figure that out. We will try this solution as well as setting up a proxy, to see which will have the least impact on the overall performance. Thanks heaps. If you need more specific help with mod_perl, I sug

Re: [us...@httpd] Re: Help - Name Server - Maybe

2009-02-01 Thread Razi Khaja
> > I don't know how you are getting the .com name to resolve to 66.133.46.108 > as that is my modem, I can't get it do do that. I tried disabling the DHCP > on the computer that is acting as server, and did switch to static IP in the > TCP/IP settings, but then I couldn't access the internet with

Re: [us...@httpd] Capturing server response

2009-02-01 Thread Solutio at Gmail
Gotcha. I haven't had to do that before, but I am sure I will figure that out. We will try this solution as well as setting up a proxy, to see which will have the least impact on the overall performance. Thanks heaps. -- From: "André Warnier" Sen

Re: [us...@httpd] Capturing server response

2009-02-01 Thread André Warnier
Solutio at Gmail wrote: Thank you for the advice and introduction to the forum rules. I "lowercased" the subject. As for the options available, we would like to avoid sending the same request to the web server (Apache) if possible. Sure, LWP could emulate a web client, but our goal is to fork

Re: [us...@httpd] Capturing server response

2009-02-01 Thread Solutio at Gmail
Thank you for the advice and introduction to the forum rules. I "lowercased" the subject. As for the options available, we would like to avoid sending the same request to the web server (Apache) if possible. Sure, LWP could emulate a web client, but our goal is to fork the very same HTTP respo

Re: [us...@httpd] PHP files not being processed. SOLVED

2009-02-01 Thread Chris Rehm
Thank you so much. It was a typo in the addhandler statement and the referenced article got me to it in minutes. - Original Message - From: "Eric Covener" To: Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 9:59 AM Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] PHP files not being processed. On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 12

Re: [us...@httpd] PHP files not being processed.

2009-02-01 Thread Eric Covener
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Chris Rehm wrote: > However, when I try to process a PHP file, even a simple "hello world" type > tutorial.php, the files are not processed but are treated as some other > type of object. That is, a download dialog is opened for them and I can > either "open" or "

[us...@httpd] PHP files not being processed.

2009-02-01 Thread Chris Rehm
I have recently installed Apache 2.2 on Windows Vista. I followed a video tutorial from the web, everything seemed to go fine and the server appears to be functioning fine. I can use it to serve html files using the localhost prefix and it functions as part of my web development process. Howev

Re: [us...@httpd] Re: Help - Name Server - Maybe

2009-02-01 Thread Michael Rogers
Norman you asked "Have you been to www.apache.org yet?-" Answer Yup! But if there is something that you think I didn't see please let me know! I do have a hard time seeing because of eye strain beyond my control, been to the eye Doc several time and gripped about it. Second problem I have to

Re: [us...@httpd] Re: Help - Name Server - Maybe

2009-02-01 Thread Michael Rogers
I don't know how you are getting the .com name to resolve to 66.133.46.108 as that is my modem, I can't get it do do that. I tried disabling the DHCP on the computer that is acting as server, and did switch to static IP in the TCP/IP settings, but then I couldn't access the internet with any of

Re: [us...@httpd] I CanNot access to svn-reps via apache-webdav. I Can access to nomal webdav of apache...

2009-02-01 Thread André Warnier
Tetsuya Suga wrote: [...] First in general, as you probably know already, the behaviour of the Microsoft DAV interface has always been quite unpredictable, and has changed many times depending on the version, the patches, the operating system, whether or not Microsoft Office was installed, etc

Re: [us...@httpd] Re: Help - Name Server - Maybe

2009-02-01 Thread Norman Peelman
Michael Rogers wrote: Okay: The .net is served by a name server on the east cost and is associated with Domain servers in listed order: NS1.IPOWERDNS.COM and NS1.IPOWERWEB.NET. The .com is served by a name server some where in Montana and shows as Domain servers in listed order: SMOKEY.MON

Re: Re: [us...@httpd] I CanNot access to svn-reps via apache-webdav. I Can access to nomal webdav of apache...

2009-02-01 Thread Tetsuya Suga
Thank you for your quick replying. > I just thought that maybe it was the usual port issue with Microsoft's DAV > interface. I think so, too. Mini-redirector has many bugs until now. So I don't trust it... > For once, that is not so surprising, because I imagine also that the normal > client use

Re: [us...@httpd] I CanNot access to svn-reps via apache-webdav. I Can access to nomal webdav of apache...

2009-02-01 Thread André Warnier
Tetsuya Suga wrote: [...] Sorry then, I cannot help you further. I just thought that maybe it was the usual port issue with Microsoft's DAV interface. Going back to your original post (very complete, thanks), I can see that the response to PROPFIND is very different between the "normal DAV" an

Re: Re: [us...@httpd] I CanNot access to svn-reps via apache-webdav. I Can access to nomal webdav of apache...

2009-02-01 Thread Tetsuya Suga
Hello, Thank you for replying. I tried to access with port-number, but I couldn't. I can access to apache's native webdav. So I think there must be a difference between apache and subversion... Tetsuya --- André Warnier wrote: > Tetsuya Suga wrote: > [...] > > > > > net use Q: http://mys

Re: [us...@httpd] connecting two apache http servers

2009-02-01 Thread Krist van Besien
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Jake Vang wrote: > I want to connect two Apache HTTP servers in the same way that I would > connect Apache to Tomcat with mod_jk. > > Right now I have two Apache servers, apache1 and apache2, accessed at > http://apache1 and http://apache2, correspondingly. Apache1

Re: [us...@httpd] Load Balancing with SSL Problems on Redirect

2009-02-01 Thread Krist van Besien
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Carl Fyffe wrote: > We have successfully configured our system to load balance across > multiple servers. We started out with: > > Users --> HTTPS --> Apache --> HTTP --> Glassfish > > This worked well, until we tried one of our scenarios where we > Post/Redirect/

Re: [us...@httpd] I CanNot access to svn-reps via apache-webdav. I Can access to nomal webdav of apache...

2009-02-01 Thread André Warnier
Tetsuya Suga wrote: [...] net use Q: http://myserver/svn/ <=== I cannot success. System error 67 has occurred. The network name cannot be found. (displayed in Japanese) Try : net use Q: http://myserver:80/svn/ (without the explicit port number, Windows may be trying to access this as a

Re: [us...@httpd] CAPTURING SERVER RESPONSE

2009-02-01 Thread André Warnier
Solutio at Gmail wrote: Hi Everybody, I wonder if there is a way to capture the entire Apache response, including its body, on the server side, and store it in a file, so we could check what the user actually gets by viewing the contents in a browser? We keep requests for audit purposes, but

[us...@httpd] I CanNot access to svn-reps via apache-webdav. I Can access to nomal webdav of apache...

2009-02-01 Thread Tetsuya Suga
Hello, I'm using Apache 2.2.9, subversion 1.4.6-7, mod_dav_svn 1.4.6-7 on Fedora Core 9. I want to access Subversion via apache as webdav. I has set up my apache like this ServerName 192.168.1.9 DocumentROOT "/var/www/ip/public_html/" DavLockDB /var/www/ip/DavLock

[us...@httpd] Re: Help - Name Server - Maybe

2009-02-01 Thread Nicholas Sherlock
Michael Rogers wrote: Okay: The .net is served by a name server on the east cost and is associated with Domain servers in listed order: NS1.IPOWERDNS.COM and NS1.IPOWERWEB.NET. The .com is served by a name server some where in Montana and shows as Domain servers in listed order: SMOKEY.MON

[us...@httpd] need explanation for mod_gzip

2009-02-01 Thread anson ho
As I need to rewrite the response headers and body that were returned from another module in apache 1.3, I've tried to find the solutions over weeks and finally found that mod_gzip do the similiar job. In "The handling of modules by Apache 1.3" section of mod_gzip installation web page (http://sc

Re: [us...@httpd] Re: Help - Name Server - Maybe

2009-02-01 Thread Michael Rogers
Okay: The .net is served by a name server on the east cost and is associated with Domain servers in listed order: NS1.IPOWERDNS.COM and NS1.IPOWERWEB.NET. The .com is served by a name server some where in Montana and shows as Domain servers in listed order: SMOKEY.MONTANAVISION.NET and NS2.MONT

[us...@httpd] Re: Help - Name Server - Maybe

2009-02-01 Thread Nicholas Sherlock
Michael Rogers wrote: Nicholas! did you try michaelsrogers.com or .net, I have two domain names. Michaelsrogers.com (currently resolving here to 66.113.46.108) gives the "connection refused" message. Michaelsrogers.net (resolving to 66.96.130.11) loads fine. Are both of these sites being