Very interesting. But would not there a socks be configured in the
remote german server ?
I don't know how to configure socks. But I have already configured squid
as an anonymous proxy with user authentication based on ncsa_auth . If I
check the IP now it it showing the german IP of the server. The
You can proxy your machine through your server in Germany as per:
on local machine
# ssh -D 1080 u...@ip.germany.server
then change your firefox preferences so that you use manual
configuration and use SOCKS with 127.0.0.1 and port 1080
hth
norman
Nicholas Sherlock wrote:
J. Bakshi wrote:
dbezerra wrote:
>
> What is happening with me is that some times the old child process is closed
> with its TCP connections before to finish its requests, but some times not.
> Is this a bug?
Define "some times". > 60 seconds? when there are more than 10 open
connections? It's helpful if you c
Evan Platt wrote:
> At 04:52 PM 1/28/2009, you wrote:
>
>> My main objective is (on Apache with Windows) to reload the configuration
>> without interrupting any request still being processed on any TCP
>> connection.
>>
>> I believe the command httpd.exe -k restart was designed to do that.
>
> No
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Evan Platt wrote:
> At 04:52 PM 1/28/2009, you wrote:
>
>> My main objective is (on Apache with Windows) to reload the configuration
>> without interrupting any request still being processed on any TCP
>> connection.
>>
>> I believe the command httpd.exe -k restart
At 04:52 PM 1/28/2009, you wrote:
My main objective is (on Apache with Windows) to reload the configuration
without interrupting any request still being processed on any TCP
connection.
I believe the command httpd.exe -k restart was designed to do that.
Not really. Have a look at
http://httpd
Hi,
Sorry to no be more precise. I will try to explain my experience with more
details.
My main objective is (on Apache with Windows) to reload the configuration
without interrupting any request still being processed on any TCP
connection.
I believe the command httpd.exe -k restart was designed
J. Bakshi wrote:
Nicholas Sherlock wrote:
If you were running a SOCKS proxy in Germany, you could use that
successfully (I presume that the transfer happens over HTTPS). Not
sure how to accomplish the task with Apache.
Thanks Nicholas,
I can install the proxy on my dedicated linux server in G
Hi.
Referring to your original post, and to the current one below :
I don't really have the "Apache developer" answer to your questions, but
I believe that you should be a little more precise in your descriptions.
What do you mean (in your first post) by "connections" and (in your last
post) by
At 02:42 PM 1/28/2009, you wrote:
The one customer I am working on this problem with is a developer at
an ISP thankfully, but he doesn't know Apache or Linux.
He does have friendly errors turned off and he is getting the message:
Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage
That still sou
Hallo List,
i have astrange problem with my apache.
I try to describe it in a short wy:
There are 2 debian etch servers with apache + libapache-mod-auth-pam
installed:
dpkg -l | grep apache
ii apache 1.3.34-4.1+etch1
versatile, high-performance HTTP server
ii a
There is no httpd -k graceful on Windows.
>From the Apache with Windows documentation:
"You can also tell Apache to restart. This forces it to reread the
configuration file. Any operations in progress are allowed to complete
without interruption. To restart Apache, use: httpd.exe -k restart"
Th
try
httpd -k graceful
restart, by design, should stop and start the server, without regard to
connections.
graceful reloads the config and then reloads each thread as it becomes inactive.
At least that's how it was put to me at a high level.
Gary
From:
That is a pretty useless error, indeed.
The number of serious errors should not be considerable enough to
prevent you from looking at each one of them separately, barring the
obvious 404's.
Frank.
Ian Lauder wrote:
The one customer I am working on this problem with is a developer at
an ISP
The one customer I am working on this problem with is a developer at
an ISP thankfully, but he doesn't know Apache or Linux.
He does have friendly errors turned off and he is getting the message:
Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage
I'm still trying to get his IP address to compare to
Hi.
You may or may not know that there is a particularity in IE about
showing error pages.
IE has some option called "show friendly error messages", in the
advanced settings somewhere, which has the effect of not displaying many
HTTP server's sent error pages, but instead displaying a built-in
Ian,
I'll put my reply on top to keep this thread readable.
This is leaning on microsoft windows support, but you can go to
tools->Internet Options->Advanced, and uncheck the "Show friendly HTTP
error messages" box and the real error should be reported on their
screen, should anything happen.
Thanks for the comments. I'm in the early stages of trying to track
down this problem and its not something I can replicate.
All I know is that when I send out a mass mailing to 20,000
customers, I get on average 2 to 4 people saying the site is down and
when I talk to them it turns out they
At 01:09 PM 1/28/2009, you wrote:
A "Page not Found" error is a DNS resolution issue. Since apache
does not provide DNS resolution, make sure that DNS servers in place
on that machine are reliable, and if possible, disable DNS caching.
Good catch... forgot that. IE of course has some of the w
At 01:05 PM 1/28/2009, you wrote:
For the most part everyone can access my web sites on an Apache
server V2.0.54 running on RedHat Linux Fedora 4
I keep getting sporadic reports from people who can not access the
web sites from Internet Explorer, but they can access it from other
browsers or
Ian Lauder wrote:
For the most part everyone can access my web sites on an Apache server
V2.0.54 running on RedHat Linux Fedora 4
I keep getting sporadic reports from people who can not access the web
sites from Internet Explorer, but they can access it from other
browsers or computers (i.e.
For the most part everyone can access my web sites on an Apache
server V2.0.54 running on RedHat Linux Fedora 4
I keep getting sporadic reports from people who can not access the
web sites from Internet Explorer, but they can access it from other
browsers or computers (i.e. switching to Firefo
dbezerra wrote:
Is there a equivalent command for Apache under Windows to apache2ctl
graceful?
Hi.
I don't really know, because supposedly you are talking about Apache
running as a Service, and that might depend on the "service wrapper" used.
But, if you go to the /bin directory of where Apach
Is there a equivalent command for Apache under Windows to apache2ctl
graceful?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/apache2ctl-graceful-on-Windows-tp21710926p21710926.html
Sent from the Apache HTTP Server - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Thanks Matus! I had enabled a different MPM module and included the
extra/httpd-mpm.conf file. The PidFile directive was duplicated there.
-Original Message-
From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [mailto:uh...@fantomas.sk]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 4:15 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subjec
Hi guys,
I am getting this error when i add a ProxyPass Directive to some of my
VHosts inmy freebsd apache Passes are working correctly and pages
all shown OK..so it seems like no harm is done except the annoying in
logs when a child spawns... I've been googleing but didnt find any
explanation
Every time I have to reinstall FreeBSD, getting PHP installed seems to
be a nightmare.
On this occasion I installed Apache, then I installed PHP5, but when
it finishes there's no PHP module for Apache, or at least I can't find
one. I checked the box to generate an Apache module on the config
scre
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:21 AM, André Warnier wrote:
> Brian Mearns wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 7:18 AM, André Warnier wrote:
>>>
>>> Anyway, the OP did not sound like he was talking about an access to Fort
>>> Knox, although you never know..
>>
>> Oh shoot! Now you've blown my cover! =
Brian Mearns wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 7:18 AM, André Warnier wrote:
Anyway, the OP did not sound like he was talking about an access to Fort
Knox, although you never know..
Oh shoot! Now you've blown my cover! =J
Man in the middle is what it is, I'm not really that concerned about
it b
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 7:18 AM, André Warnier wrote:
> Anyway, the OP did not sound like he was talking about an access to Fort
> Knox, although you never know..
Oh shoot! Now you've blown my cover! =J
Man in the middle is what it is, I'm not really that concerned about
it because I'm not deali
Hi All,
i have a question about Apache cache (mod_cache). My virtual host is the
follow:
ServerName www.anexample.org
UseCanonicalName On
CacheDefaultExpire 36000
CacheEnable mem /
CacheIgnoreCacheControl On
CacheIgnoreNoLastMod On
CacheMaxExpire 7200
CacheStoreN
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:18:10 +0100
André Warnier wrote:
> But any MITM attack would first have to start by corrupting the DNS
> system anyway, which should not be that easy, or is it ?
> (excepting phishing of course)
A network admin (e.g. an ISP) can insert their own transparent
proxy. Or req
Nick Kew wrote:
On 27 Jan 2009, at 21:00, André Warnier wrote:
The only real weak spot is the "man in the middle".
Heh. You mean it doesn't use client certificates. The server knows
it's talking to just one client, but can't be certain who that client is.
You can use the same attack with
Hi,
I'm running Apache/2.2.11 with mod_jk/1.2.27 on Windows Server 2003. I would
like to know how mod_cache behaves when it receives multiple concurrent
requests to a URL that's not in cache (or has expired). Will it request the URL
multiple times from the back-end Tomcat application server via
On 27 Jan 2009, at 21:00, André Warnier wrote:
The only real weak spot is the "man in the middle".
Heh. You mean it doesn't use client certificates. The server knows
it's talking to just one client, but can't be certain who that client
is.
You can use the same attack with HTTPS, too. T
Nicholas Sherlock wrote:
> J. Bakshi wrote:
>> Dear list,
>>
>> This is an Off-topic question but I'm sure that Some of you can focus
>> on it.
>>
>> If I transfer money to wirecard bank outside Germany it says
>> " Please note that Wirecard is currently not offered in your country."
>>
>> But I ha
J. Bakshi wrote:
Dear list,
This is an Off-topic question but I'm sure that Some of you can focus on it.
If I transfer money to wirecard bank outside Germany it says
" Please note that Wirecard is currently not offered in your country."
But I have no problem to do the same when I'm in Germany.
On 23.01.09 17:48, Jorge Medina wrote:
> I am specifying the PidFile directive but the PidFile always gets
> created under (ServerRoot)/logs/
>
> I get the same bahaviour in all platforms.
>
> I tried putting the PidFile directive just after the ServerRoot (in case
> it needed to be specified a
Dear list,
This is an Off-topic question but I'm sure that Some of you can focus on it.
If I transfer money to wirecard bank outside Germany it says
" Please note that Wirecard is currently not offered in your country."
But I have no problem to do the same when I'm in Germany.
How can I get rid
39 matches
Mail list logo
