Thanks brian foe ur suggestion, in future I will follow the same.
Can u let me is this a error or a memory problem.
Regards
aftab
-Original Message-
From: Brian Mearns [mailto:mearn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 6:56 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [us...@htt
Thanks for your help.
Actually, I found the answer after I mailing this question.
The point is "/i-data/md0" is a softlink and point to "/i-data/aed390a8". But I
set AliasMatch "^(?i)/music(.*)" "/i-data/ aed390a8/music$1" in my httpd.conf.
In addition, I only set , not set . So apache can't fin
I have a project that's using client certificate verification, and I
want to implement a custom mechanism for verifying certificates. In
particular, I do not care if a certificate traces back to a CA. I want
to evaluate the certificate myself and decide whether or not it is
acceptable.
Right now,
Eric Covener wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Brian Mearns wrote:
The only thing I can think of is reversing the orders of the Location
tags, i.e., have the more global one come first.
I know OP reported that this failed, but I think this is the route to pursue.
Did you try "AuthType
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Dan Poirier wrote:
> Require group authorized_users
> Require ldap-attribute employeeType=active
>
> in hopes of requiring users to both belong to the authorized_users group and
> be an active employee, but that won't work. Whichever module gets invoked
> first wi
Hi.
One does not really know where to start.. ;-)
Maybe you should provide some basic details about the Operating System
under which you are trying this, the version of Apache you are using,
and what "http://ip/"; really means. Is "ip" the IP address of your host ?
Some notes :
1) I do not
I'm trying to understand how all the parts of
authentication/authorization in Apache 2.2 fit together, and have run
into something that doesn't seem quite right to me. I'm wondering if
I'm correct about how it works. I've been looking at the doc, as well
as reading request.c.
Suppose you ha
I saw that trail... hence some of the questions:
- why the error in particular with mod_jk (Rainer wrote once that jk module
use pthreads - is that different from other module)? are a few of these
errors actually really bad?
- is sysvsem a better Mutex to change to on newer Solaris 10 (hasn't the
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:46 PM, fredk2 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was doing some stress test (with apache ab, 100 users, 100K requests) to
> compare an Apache prefork and worker mpm. The test url is a simple hello
> servlet on Tomcat 6.0.x via mod_jk. On my Solaris 10 server with only the
> Apache wit
Hi,
I was doing some stress test (with apache ab, 100 users, 100K requests) to
compare an Apache prefork and worker mpm. The test url is a simple hello
servlet on Tomcat 6.0.x via mod_jk. On my Solaris 10 server with only the
Apache with worker mpm I see following error messages in my jk log:
A
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Karim Zaki wrote:
> Unfortunately
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 6:46 PM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Processing mod_cache after mod_rewrite
>
> On Thu,
Unfortunately
-Original Message-
From: Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 6:46 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Processing mod_cache after mod_rewrite
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Karim Zaki wrote:
> Eric,
>
> I downloade
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Karim Zaki wrote:
> Eric,
>
> I downloaded 2.2.11, applied the patch, and re-built mod_cache. It succeeded
> and generated mod_cache.so. However, after replacing mod_cache.so with the
> updated one on my server, Apache refused to start. The message just says "Th
Eric,
I downloaded 2.2.11, applied the patch, and re-built mod_cache. It succeeded
and generated mod_cache.so. However, after replacing mod_cache.so with the
updated one on my server, Apache refused to start. The message just says "The
requested operation has failed!" and the log is empty. Even
howard chen wrote:
Hello,
If I remember correctly, back to the old day when I use Apache 1.3x,
is it possible with mod_gzip, why this function is dropped in 2.x
mod_deflate?
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_deflate.html
Don't you guy think compressing a static CSS or JS on-the-fly is w
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:07 AM, howard chen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> If I remember correctly, back to the old day when I use Apache 1.3x,
> is it possible with mod_gzip, why this function is dropped in 2.x
> mod_deflate?
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_deflate.html
>
> Don't you guy thin
Hello,
If I remember correctly, back to the old day when I use Apache 1.3x,
is it possible with mod_gzip, why this function is dropped in 2.x
mod_deflate?
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_deflate.html
Don't you guy think compressing a static CSS or JS on-the-fly is wasteful?
Any idea?
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Aftab Alam - IT wrote:
> Hi ,
> I have apache 2.0.52 running on Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4
> (Nahant Update 6), I have a issue while running apache, it shows me lot of
> PID of HTTPS while using top command
Some of those are massive. try MaxRequestsPerC
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Brian Mearns wrote:
>
> The only thing I can think of is reversing the orders of the Location
> tags, i.e., have the more global one come first.
I know OP reported that this failed, but I think this is the route to pursue.
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
Eric, thanks for responding.
No I did not try it yet, I was trying to get a feel from the list to see
if anyone has a similar configuration or setup. The auth_ldap
documentation does not say you can or cannot have multiple require group
entries while it explicitly mentions having multiple require
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:05 AM, James Chavez
wrote:
> Hello,
> I have 2 different groups that I need to allow access to in my
> httpd.conf using auth_ldap. One group is for US and the other is for a
> UK domain.
>
> Is it possible for me to have 2 require group directives listed one
> after the o
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Jan Hoskens wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion, but switching the order of the location tags
> didn't work either...
>
> Kind Regards,
> Jan
>
> On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 09:09 -0500, Brian Mearns wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Jan Hoskens wrote:
>> > Hi a
Thanks for the suggestion, but switching the order of the location tags
didn't work either...
Kind Regards,
Jan
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 09:09 -0500, Brian Mearns wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Jan Hoskens wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After some digging in the Apache docs I managed to come
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Jan Hoskens wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After some digging in the Apache docs I managed to come up with the
> following configuration snippet to secure my whole server excluding one
> directory:
>
>
> Order deny,allow
> Allow from all
> Satisfy any
> ProxyPass http:/
Thanks for pointing out ;)
--
Javier Miqueleiz --
"Listen to your heart. It knows all things, because it came from the Soul of
the World, and it will one day return there."
-
Hi all,
After some digging in the Apache docs I managed to come up with the
following configuration snippet to secure my whole server excluding one
directory:
Order deny,allow
Allow from all
Satisfy any
ProxyPass http://someproxyserver.com
ProxyPassReverse http://someproxyserver.com
Nick Kew pisze:
Marcin wrote:
I didn't wanted to do proxy, I wanted just to change e.g. /abc to /xyz
and then pass it directly (without proxing) to rails handler.
Sounds like you want the "Alias" directive.
I don't think so, because it maps to the filesystem. My URLs are not
real, they do
Sorry, I can't provide any help with your problem, but in the future,
please use more descriptive subject lines. Specifyng in the body of
your message what version you're using is always good, but it doesn't
make a very helpful subject line. You're more likely to get [helpful]
responses if your sub
Marcin wrote:
I didn't wanted to do proxy, I wanted just to change e.g. /abc to /xyz
and then pass it directly (without proxing) to rails handler.
Sounds like you want the "Alias" directive.
--
Nick Kew
-
The official User-T
Krist van Besien pisze:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Marcin wrote:
I've tried also to force it to treat this as an URL, not a path by passing
full URL:
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} (.+)\.demo\.myapp\.com$
RewriteRule ^/$ http://%0/usersite/%1
As log says, it constructs UR
Hi,
I finally got Header command work (problem is due to mod_headers.so
installation). But I still can't solve my originally problem, after the
header command is run, a new Set-Cookie Header is appended. That is not what
I want. What I want is describe below.
Originally reply header
Set-Cook
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Marcin wrote:
> I've tried also to force it to treat this as an URL, not a path by passing
> full URL:
>
> RewriteEngine On
> RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} (.+)\.demo\.myapp\.com$
> RewriteRule ^/$ http://%0/usersite/%1
>
> As log says, it constructs URL in a good w
A patch already exists for this. See
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=727052&view=rev
Javier Miqueleiz wrote:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 12:20:01PM +, Ian Lea wrote:
Hi
On apache 2.2.10 a config file with these lines
BalancerMember ajp://localhost:17100 route=yyy ping=10
works
Thanks. I'll give it a shot.
From: Eric Covener [cove...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 19:44
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Processing mod_cache after mod_rewrite
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Karim Zaki wrote:
> S
Grand, thanks. That fix works for me too.
--
Ian.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Javier Miqueleiz wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 12:20:01PM +, Ian Lea wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>>
>> On apache 2.2.10 a config file with these lines
>>
>>
>> BalancerMember ajp://localhost:17100 route=yyy p
Hi..
I set my configuration of apache as following (one the part about
webdav)...
===
DAVLockDB /tmp/lockdb
Options All
Order allow,deny
Allow from all
Dav on
===
It is VERY simple, right? But
Hi chaps,
We've got a problem with a new ubuntu server which we've setup to be our SVN
and TRAC box. For months we've been doing testing on how to move the sites
over, configure them for LDAP at the same time, and we haven't had a problem.
However, as often happens due to sods law, when the box
37 matches
Mail list logo
