> RewriteRule /(.*)$ http://www.foo.com/$1 [R=301]
Andre, you've hit it on the nose here.
Thank you and the List.
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 2:53 PM, André Warnier wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Am I interpreting this correctly, that the .htaccess file you are talking
> about, is the one that is in the original
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 5:53 PM, André Warnier wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Am I interpreting this correctly, that the .htaccess file you are talking
> about, is the one that is in the original /techblog location ?
>
> If so, and without taking my word for it, isn't it so for a RewriteRule that
> is in a .hta
Hi.
Am I interpreting this correctly, that the .htaccess file you are
talking about, is the one that is in the original /techblog location ?
If so, and without taking my word for it, isn't it so for a RewriteRule
that is in a .htaccess file in such a location "/techblog", that the
original U
2008/12/29 Matthew Sacks :
> I cleared all rewrites so all I have is the following:
> RewriteRule ^/techblog(.*)$ http://www.foo.com/$1 [R=301]
If you're using this in per-dir context (e.g. in .htaccess files)
reachable via http://www.example.com/.htaccess, strip the leading
slash of the pattern:
I cleared all rewrites so all I have is the following:
RewriteRule ^/techblog(.*)$ http://www.foo.com/$1 [R=301]
I want http://www.bar.com/techblog/thisfile.html to be redirected to
http://www.foo.com/thisfile.html
I cant seem to get this to work. all I get is 404
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 2:54
Ok.. and for the third time, what happens if you telnet to whatever port
the web server is operating on when this happens?
You may want to consider upgrading. 2.0.59 is at least a year old, if
I'm not mistaken.
vadi raj wrote:
Sorry , mention all the detail bellow.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Sorry , mention all the detail bellow.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 5)
Linux 2.6.9-55.0.2.ELsmp #1 SMP Tue Jun 12 17:59:08 EDT 2007 i686 athlon i386
GNU/Linux
Apache/2.0.59 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.0.59 OpenSSL/0.9.8d PHP/4.4.4
--- On Mon, 12/29/08, Evan Platt wrote:
> From:
Hello,
im looking for a way to disable the posibility for users to activate a
server-status page within own virtual host.
For now it is enough to add a .htaccess with content
sethandler server-status
i do not want that my users can see all what happens at apache-traffic.
i can just only hide
As I asked before...
What operating system?
>
> On the local machine, when this happens, what happens
if you telnet to port
> > 80 (assuming you are running on port 80)?
> >
> >
vadi raj wrote:
Dear All,
Thanks for your kind response.
I request you peoples to tell me what are t
