James Taylor-Bye wrote:
Hi and many thanks for your prompt reply. I believe in trying to be as
polite as possible when it comes to asking for help from strangers. Anyway
on with my problem...
You are absolutely correct in your assumptions, so far. A bit more detail
on my problem. I can i
Hi!
Is there a way to disable logging of invalid requests to an HTTP
server (which result in a 501 response code)? I would like to log only
specific URLs and I am using SetEnvIf with CustomLog to do that, like:
SetEnvIf Request_URI "^/$" log_request=yes
SetEnvIf Request_URI "^/index.html$" log_re
Ok, correct me if I got this wrong. This issue seems to boil down to multiple
fcntl use in a threaded fashion on Solaris.
If we can ensure that if we only ever use fcntl in one location, then it seems
that it would not be an issue. Alternatively, we can try and ensure that we
just do not use
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 6:17 PM, Ong, Lawrence K
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We are currently getting a lot of warnings in our logs in regards to
> deadlock, and I am wondering if anyone have experienced seen the following.
>
> Under load, we would get:
>
> [Fri Dec 12 08:50:23 2008] [warn] (45)Deadlock
Hi All,
We are currently getting a lot of warnings in our logs in regards to deadlock,
and I am wondering if anyone have experienced seen the following.
Under load, we would get:
[Fri Dec 12 08:50:23 2008] [warn] (45)Deadlock situation detected/avoided:
Failed to acquire SSL session cache lock
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:25 PM, killbulle wrote:
>
> Hi the list,
> i have a windows apache 2.0.63 install,
> and i like to size correctly this value for my production machine 2GB/dual
> core serving static and jk stream
> is there a rule for sizing winnt mpm
You need one thread for each concurr
Hi the list,
i have a windows apache 2.0.63 install,
and i like to size correctly this value for my production machine 2GB/dual
core serving static and jk stream
is there a rule for sizing winnt mpm
rule exist for linux server mpm but not for the winnt ?
i've saw some thread were person use very
Hello,
I currently have an apache server running as a load-balancer between
multiple tomcat machines. My problem is this: I would like to be able to
update the tomcat machines without bringing down the whole system and
disrupting users. Ideally, a machine would be flagged to stop servicing
Eric,
That really helps.
Thanks for the explanantion.
-Vijay
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Vijay wrote:
> > Thanks Eric,
> >
> > Sorry i did not get it..
> > You said "Those aren't name-based yet"..
> > what would make them name based
Hi and many thanks for your prompt reply. I believe in trying to be as
polite as possible when it comes to asking for help from strangers. Anyway
on with my problem...
You are absolutely correct in your assumptions, so far. A bit more detail
on my problem. I can install the programme prope
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Vijay wrote:
> Thanks Eric,
>
> Sorry i did not get it..
> You said "Those aren't name-based yet"..
> what would make them name based?
>
>
> My aim is to use name based ssl vhosts listening on multiple ports.
> (we are not able to use IP based hosts since sitemind
Thanks Eric,
Sorry i did not get it..
You said "Those aren't name-based yet"..
what would make them name based?
My aim is to use name based ssl vhosts listening on multiple ports.
(we are not able to use IP based hosts since siteminder does not have
capability to ignore hosts with IPaddress)
-
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Vijay wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We are trying to implement SSL & SSO (siteminder) on our Apache2.0.55.
> We have some restrictions with IP based vhosts, so we are trying to use name
> based vhosts (with SSL)
>
> Is it possible to have multiple name based vhosts listenin
Hi all,
We are trying to implement SSL & SSO (siteminder) on our Apache2.0.55.
We have some restrictions with IP based vhosts, so we are trying to use name
based vhosts (with SSL)
Is it possible to have multiple name based vhosts listening on different
ports for SSL something like:
Each ssl.conf
Eric Covener wrote:
[...]
apache2-default is located in /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/default or a
broken configuration shipped by Ubuntu and Debian Linux or comment out
the "RedirectMatch" bloated statement in the config file
I know it's a favorite thing on Apache and Tomcat forums to berate the
You are the suuunshnnee!
yeah! it rocks!
well... so... uhm...
as you told me I commented the RedirectMatch
in /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/default.
thanks again!
--
La libertà di scelta deriva dal dominare l'abitudine.
-
Simple fix: have a job on the server that comes by and takes all the
auth data from one source and consolidates it into its own, then goes to
the next, rinse repeat.
Shoudlnt be hard...
--
Morgan Gangwere
Unknown Software
http://sonof.bandit.name/
Member, INCOSE [ incose.org ] PACA [ paca.org
Leo Li wrote:
Hi, all
I would like to adopt apache http server in my project. But it is
necessary for the http server to be an in-process module to be plugged
in the current system. That is, I would make a little modification to
the make file and build the httpd as a dll/so and export
Conte Szandor wrote:
no ducktale.org is a fake domain because httpd works on a lan ;-) and respond
on a internal ip
What it sounds like to me is that you need to have a DNS record on the
inside (or at least an entry in your HOSTS file) that says that x.x.x.x
is Ducktale.org -- the only way
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Eric Covener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Conte Szandor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Goodmorning you all,
>> I am new to apache and I am already having problems.
>> I'm running Server version: Apache/2.2.3 on debian etch, i
As the
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Conte Szandor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Goodmorning you all,
> I am new to apache and I am already having problems.
> I'm running Server version: Apache/2.2.3 on debian etch, i
> # httpd.conf##
Doesn't your quoted conf miss all the debian httpd config w
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Conte Szandor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Include /etc/squirrelmail/apache.conf
Anything in there?
--
Eric Covener
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Agreed, can we get the [EMAIL PROTECTED] back? This is especially relevant
when some of us get paged whenever an e-mail comes into the general mail
box...
-Tim Spangler
Systems Engineer
ADP Screening and Selection Services
-Original Message-
From: Julian Dunn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
S
Some of us are using e-mail systems (*cough* GroupWise *cough*) that
don't support fancy things like this. Can someone turn the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
back on in the subject line?
- Julian
>>> "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/11/2008 11:13
AM >>>
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Lester Caine wro
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Lester Caine wrote:
Someone seems to have switched off the [EMAIL PROTECTED] again?
http://gushi.livejournal.com/451615.html?mode=reply
Note the date predates this little disaster, but I've switched over to
this and been happier for it...this way when I shuffle all my li
Il Thursday 11 December 2008 15:21:13 Tom Evans ha scritto:
> On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 14:53 +0100, Conte Szandor wrote:
> > Goodmorning you all,
> > I am new to apache and I am already having problems.
> > I'm running Server version: Apache/2.2.3 on debian etch, it starts and I
> > fixed some its str
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Craig McQueen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's a global company and we now want to allow remote branches to access the
> server. That means we want to extend authentication somehow.
I had the same issues, also with an apache subversion server.
In the end I settl
I thought it was just methought I was getting loads of spam...LOL
Kriss :-)
---Original Message---
From: Lester Caine
Date: 11/12/2008 15:15:13
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Flag missing from message subject again?
Someone seems to have switched off the [EMAIL PROTECTED] ag
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Erik Bloodaxe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> I have a strange problem with ldap auth.
>
> In a .htaccess file I have:
>
> AuthBasicProvider ldap
> AuthType Basic
> AuthName "Access to somesite logs"
> AuthLDAPURL ldap://ldap-server.dlog.ac.uk/dc=
Someone seems to have switched off the [EMAIL PROTECTED] again?
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/lsces/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop -
Hi, all,
I have a strange problem with ldap auth.
In a .htaccess file I have:
AuthBasicProvider ldap
AuthType Basic
AuthName "Access to somesite logs"
AuthLDAPURL ldap://ldap-server.dlog.ac.uk/dc=gold,dc=ac,dc=uk?uid?base
require ldap-user user1 user2 user3
This is working fine.
On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 14:53 +0100, Conte Szandor wrote:
> Goodmorning you all,
> I am new to apache and I am already having problems.
> I'm running Server version: Apache/2.2.3 on debian etch, it starts and I
> fixed
> some its strangies but it still shows the document root in the address bar.
>
Goodmorning you all,
I am new to apache and I am already having problems.
I'm running Server version: Apache/2.2.3 on debian etch, it starts and I fixed
some its strangies but it still shows the document root in the address bar.
when I connect to my own site, instead only showing ducktale.org it s
Hi.
Craig McQueen wrote:
[...]
I believe (only believe, not certain), that the Windows Domain method
would work if your local domain and the global domain were in a "trust
relationship" (Windows Domain term) with eachother. That is, the DC
that you use for SSPI authentication acepts the id's
Thanks for your reply. Your question prompted me to check the docs
again, and I see there is the AuthLDAPRemoteUserIsDN option. I hadn't
realised that possibility before. I'll try it. Requiring our users to
enter their username in FQD isn't going to work. But if
AuthLDAPRemoteUserIsDN works in
Hi, all
I would like to adopt apache http server in my project. But it is
necessary for the http server to be an in-process module to be plugged in
the current system. That is, I would make a little modification to the make
file and build the httpd as a dll/so and export the main method for o
Does the option 3 work changing the username from the form domain\username
into [EMAIL PROTECTED] (domain in fqd form i.e. example.com)?
Regards Michele
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Craig McQueen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> My company (in Australia) has a working Apache server on its Intrane
My company (in Australia) has a working Apache server on its Intranet --
incidentally, for serving Subversion. It's on Windows 2003 and it's set
up for authentication using the SSPI module. Currently Apache 2.0 but I
want to upgrade to 2.2 to support the latest Subversion. We are also
using a Subve
38 matches
Mail list logo
