Hi,
I want to build Apache 2.2.10 with static linking instead of default
shared linking. I just want one httpd binary.
Old versions used to have "--disable-shared" option in configure
script, this does not seem to exist now in new version.
Any clues how do I get statically linked Apache ?
Thank
Hey EricI changed #Timeout 120#MaxKeepAliveRequests 100##StartServers 8#MinSpareServers5#MaxSpareServers
20#ServerLimit 256#MaxClients 256#MaxRequestsPerChild
4000#to:Timeout 300MaxKeepAliveRequests 0StartServers 30MinSpareServers5MaxSpareServers
50ServerLimi
Tom Belmount wrote:
Hey guys, Im having a problem where my websites are loading slow in IE only.
Might IE be the cause then, rather than the effect ?
It started doing this after i made changes to my httpd.conf file.
Such as ? come on, give us a clue ..
At the same time i also installed eacc
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Tom Belmount <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Im having a problem where my websites are loading slow in IE only. It
> started doing this after i made changes to my httpd.conf file. At the same
> time i also installed eaccelerator.
What did you change?
Hav
Hey guys,Im having a problem where my websites are loading slow in IE only. It
started doing this after i made changes to my httpd.conf file. At the same time
i also installed eaccelerator.I'm finding it hard to find/fix the problem. Im
still very new with this. Not all of the virtual hosts run
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
> Upgrade. 2.0.x mod_proxy is ancient and had lots of bugs. Correct
> handling of response headers was fixed just over a year ago (though
> that was principally down to protocol niceties, and I think cookies
> in 2.2 may have been fixed much earlie
Brian Mearns wrote:
[...]
Thanks Brian, I agree with what you wrote.
Prasanth, maybe the correct place to start is here :
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2616.html
The various HTTP "methods" are described in section 9.2 and later.
I suggest to start reading from the beginning however.
The way in whi
Well, It's very possible you know something I don't, but based on my
understanding on POST, it sounds like you're confused about how it
works. The use case I'm familiar with is to create a cgi script, or a
server side script like PHP that receives the POST data and saves it
to a file. And you're ri
André Warnier wrote:
Indeed.
So either you create a sript/program that goes directly in the cache and
clears the document (which would mean you can recalculate the hash that
mod_cache uses for a given URL), or else you find another clever way.
This is yet another idea.
I just downloaded the
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 2:24 AM, Vinay Purohit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have created my own apache connector and would like to load this on
> virtual server level in Apache 2.2.10 i.e. different connector in different
> virtual server host block.
>
> Since I can not place LoadModule di
Indeed.
So either you create a sript/program that goes directly in the cache and
clears the document (which would mean you can recalculate the hash that
mod_cache uses for a given URL), or else you find another clever way.
Let's say that for Tomcat, the expensive part of the operation is to
r
Another update. It was possible to make it happen using virtual hosts by
setting the ServerName attribute of both virtual hosts the same, with the only
difference being that one of them has CacheIgnoreCacheControl set to On, and
the other to Off, and then sending a request to that host with cach
Seems I'm back at square 1. The idea of using max-age=0 did not work, which, on
second thought, makes sense. CacheIgnoreCacheControl should ignore the
"cache-control" header regardless of its value. The virtual host solution did
not work either. It created new cache entries for the vhost.
-
That's not great news. When you say the hostname, do you mean ServerName or the
address configured for the virtual host? I don't have any problems setting the
same ServerName for both.
-Original Message-
From: André Warnier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 6:10 P
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
You still have something wrong in the setup of your email program, and
it still posts a funny subject.
I appreciate that you are a beginner with Apache, and do not want to
discourage you. But, really, in the long term you would do yourself a
big favor by first
YP!it worked!thank you Justin!
I tried that last time and must of left out something probably a stupid
comma or a space:-)
Kriss :-)
---Original Message---
From: Justin Pasher
Date: 01/12/2008 21:54:27
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
16 matches
Mail list logo
