Hi,
I have created my own apache connector and would like to load this on
virtual server level in Apache 2.2.10 i.e. different connector in
different virtual server host block.
Since I can not place LoadModule directive inside the virtual server
host block Is there any way i can get the same a
Thanks I will have a go and see what happenskeep fingers crossed for me.
. :-)
Kriss :-)
---Original Message---
From: Justin Pasher
Date: 01/12/2008 21:54:27
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .htaccess
Kriss wrote:
>
> This is what the file says
>
> Or
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 7:00 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> First of all, sorry for the long mail. Gist of the mail is to know how to
> use the POST method for Apache server without installing Tomcat or any third
> party software.
Basically you can't.
When you "POST" something, y
Hello Andre,
First, thank you very much for the reply and the effort.
>>This list is a support list for the Apache httpd server, and people here
try to accomodate even ultra-beginners with Apache/httpd.
I am an ultra-beginner. After doing some google search, I had come to the
understanding tha
Hi there,
We're writing a load balancer system and we need to be able to log the
CPU utilisation for each request. Ideally we'd like to log it to an
external network service although we're open to any way of getting the
per-request CPU time out of Apache.
Does anyone know of any way to get t
Kriss wrote:
This is what the file says
Order Deny,Allow
Deny from 80.41.61.248
RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} fillbest\.com [NC]
RewriteRule .* - [F]
and the file is in the folder before the public_html one...I think you
can tell I really am technical...LOL and the one I
Sander Temme-2 wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 30, 2008, at 11:02 PM, apache123 wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Sander Temme-2 wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Nov 30, 2008, at 8:20 PM, apache123 wrote:
>>>
Hi,
I tried apachectl command on two Linux hosts where Apache HTTP
Server is
installed. The co
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> apache123 wrote:
>>
>> 1. Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 4 (Nahant Update 6) [ apachectl
>> working fine ]
>>
>> 2. Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant) [ apachectl not
>> working
>> ]
>
> Why run such an absurdly old version? Try
This is what the file says
Order Deny,Allow
Deny from 80.41.61.248
RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} fillbest\.com [NC]
RewriteRule .* - [F]
and the file is in the folder before the public_html one...I think you can
tell I really am technical...LOL and the one I want to add is see
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Kriss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> I am probably not talking to the right people at all but I am at the end of
> my tether on where to goI have updated my htaccess to ban a URL from
> using my bandwidth the problem is that I need to ban another one s
Hi,
I have a compressed and an uncompressed version of the same document on
my disk. If the client sends the correct Accept-Encoding I want to send
the compressed version otherwise the uncompressed. If I send the
compressed version a Vary header is set. So the answer is correct.
But how about
Hi guys
I am probably not talking to the right people at all but I am at the end of
my tether on where to goI have updated my htaccess to ban a URL from
using my bandwidth the problem is that I need to ban another one so I did
what I thought I was supposed to do and all of my scripts on the w
Eric Covener wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:09 AM, André Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Which leads me to believe that, as such, the scheme proposed with the
separate VirtualHost will not work as simply as expected.
Yep, it looks like you'd need to jump through hoops to have a vhost
that
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:09 AM, André Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which leads me to believe that, as such, the scheme proposed with the
> separate VirtualHost will not work as simply as expected.
Yep, it looks like you'd need to jump through hoops to have a vhost
that was able to nuke th
Thanks a lot for your response. I would go through the documentation and
would try my best.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:02 AM, André Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, now it is a bit clearer.
> You really need to read the series of earlier messages I mentioned earlier.
> The basic case is v
One last note : following your original post, I re-read the Apache
documentation on "caching content" (never a bad idea, that).
In there, I saw something about the fact that in order to cache content,
mod_cache calculates a hashcode for the URL to cache, in which
calculation is included (and tha
Ok, now it is a bit clearer.
You really need to read the series of earlier messages I mentioned
earlier. The basic case is very similar to yours.
Thus, you have an Apache front-end, and a Tomcat back-end.
The Tomcat back-end is the one that produces the answers, which are
generally large PDF
I think I will try using the virtual host option first..
Thanks to everyone for your contributions to the discussion.
-Original Message-
From: André Warnier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 3:54 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Clearing
Will do
-Original Message-
From: Tamer Embaby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 5:49 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: Clearing cache selectively on Apache +
mod_cache
Karim,
Please let me know if it works for you.
Tamer
-Orig
I am sorry if my question is vague. Anyways YES you are right we already have
an application which runs on tomcat and Apache web server. The PDF documents
I mentioned are big and they need to be retrieved everytime from database
whenever user requests, and we have quite a volume of users and their
Karim,
Please let me know if it works for you.
Tamer
-Original Message-
From: Karim Zaki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 3:58 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: Clearing cache selectively on Apache +
mod_cache
Yeah in this instanc
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:35 AM, srinivasch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> As of now I have done nothing, just going through the documentation
> whether it can be done, I posted here if anyone has already done this. That
> is my URL construct and its not from a form submission, its fr
srinivasch wrote:
[...]
Hi.
The problem is, your question is so vague that it is difficult to give
you any precise response.
You may benefit from reading the messages of one of the previous threads
on this same list, the ones with the subject :
Clearing cache selectively on Apache + mod_cach
Hi Eric,
As of now I have done nothing, just going through the documentation
whether it can be done, I posted here if anyone has already done this. That
is my URL construct and its not from a form submission, its from view record
where there is a link to download the file and the URL of that wo
Hi.
First I think you need to fix your email program, because it is giving
some really bizarre stuff in the subject of your emails.
Second, I would recommend that you get some basic training about what
the HTTP protocol is and does.
This list is a support list for the Apache httpd server, and
Hi All,
First of all, sorry for the long mail. To give a gist of the mail, I want to
know how to use the POST method for Apache server without installing Tomcat or
anything.
I have a "Server version: Apache/2.0.54" installed in my system. I have
configured it to act as a server as well as a
Hi All,
First of all, sorry for the long mail. Gist of the mail is to know how to use
the POST method for Apache server without installing Tomcat or any third party
software.
I have a "Server version: Apache/2.0.54" installed in my system. I have
configured it to act as a server as well as a
When I look at this series of messages, and at a previous thread on this
list, with subject : Best filesystem type for mod_cache in reverse proxy?
and at this :
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/caching.html
then I get the idea that the directory/file structure used by
mod_disk_cache is not so co
Yeah in this instance there are 2 interfaces on the box. I'll use the internal
interface, which is not accessible from the Internet anyway...so
CacheIgnoreCacheControl Off
Let's see how that works.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Covener [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Tamer Embaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric,
>
> So using 2 vhosts would be:
>
> # External vhost
>
>ServerName www.example.com
>CacheRoot /path/to/cache
>Cache disk /url
>CacheIgnoreCacheControl On
>CacheMaxExpire 86400
>
Eric,
So using 2 vhosts would be:
# External vhost
ServerName www.example.com
CacheRoot /path/to/cache
Cache disk /url
CacheIgnoreCacheControl On
CacheMaxExpire 86400
CacheDefaultExpire 86400
# Internal vhost
ServerName cache-internal.ex
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:20 AM, srinivasch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I need some help in configuration or some snippet to help me in
>> configuring my apache web server to cache frequently downloaded non static
>> file from my application. each file has a different ID. I am totally new
>> to
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Karim Zaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That sounds like a great idea, but how do I configure mod_cache differently
> for the vhost? Would I configure it within the vhost scope? If so, that
> configuration would need to point to the same cache store, but without th
Anyone please help
srinivasch wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I need some help in configuration or some snippet to help me in
> configuring my apache web server to cache frequently downloaded non static
> file from my application. each file has a different ID. I am totally new
> to this apache configurat
That sounds like a great idea, but how do I configure mod_cache differently for
the vhost? Would I configure it within the vhost scope? If so, that
configuration would need to point to the same cache store, but without the
CacheIgnoreCacheControl, right?
-Original Message-
From: Eric Co
Yes. When a page changes, this fires an event, which I can catch and run some
code. I would like that code to clear the cache for this specific page.
-Original Message-
From: André Warnier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 2:50 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 7:46 AM, Karim Zaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So the CacheIgnoreCacheControl directive ignores "max-age" as well as
> "no-cache"? I've seen some stuff online that suggested that it honors
> "max-age=0", but not "no-cache"…which would provide a nice little backdoor.
you mi
Ok then.
So, how do you know that a given page changed ?
I mean, if you don't want to wait, it means you have some way to know
that the page has changed for which you don't want to wait, right ?
Karim Zaki wrote:
This is exactly what is in place right now. I've written a filter in Tomcat to s
So the CacheIgnoreCacheControl directive ignores "max-age" as well as
"no-cache"? I've seen some stuff online that suggested that it honors
"max-age=0", but not "no-cache"...which would provide a nice little backdoor.
From: Tamer Embaby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 1
This is exactly what is in place right now. I've written a filter in Tomcat to
set the "Expires" header, and Apache honors it. However, when a page changes, I
don't want to have to wait 24 hours for that change to reflect in the cache,
and I don't want to have to clear the whole cache either. I
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 6:55 AM, Torsten Foertsch
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am about to set up compression. One thing puzzles me a bit. Nowadays
> most browsers know how to handle compressed data. So, it seems to me
> that storing that data compressed on disk and send it via sendfile
>
Torsten Foertsch wrote:
Hi,
I am about to set up compression. One thing puzzles me a bit. Nowadays
most browsers know how to handle compressed data. So, it seems to me
that storing that data compressed on disk and send it via sendfile
would be better than having mod_deflate compress it each t
Hi,
I am about to set up compression. One thing puzzles me a bit. Nowadays
most browsers know how to handle compressed data. So, it seems to me
that storing that data compressed on disk and send it via sendfile
would be better than having mod_deflate compress it each time anew. The
few clients
Karim,
Because we instructed mod_cache to ignore CacheControl headers as
well, it's the same as your case.
Tamer
From: Karim Zaki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 12:36 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: Clearing
I guess it all depends on your definition of "dynamic", and how you
handle this at the source.
When your Tomcat generates an answer page, it can add HTTP headers that
indicate for how long this content is valid. If it doesn't, then by
default this means that the page is effectively "dynamic"
Hi All,
I was adding anpther apache node to the cluster. All the nodes have RHEL5
installed on it. I downloaded the source httpd-2.2.10 and compile it using
commands:
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/apache --enable-module=so
--enable-rewrite=shared --enable-cgi=shared --enable-unique_id=shared
--
But that would be like re-implementing mod_cache, wouldn't it? Apache is
already doing this for me. It's caching the dynamic content, keeping it for 24
hours, and checking if it's in cache before requesting it from the back-end
server. The only problem is that I need to sometimes clear certain p
Karim Zaki wrote:
Greetings all,
I'm running Apache/2.2.10 (Win32) mod_jk/1.2.27 + mod_cache. I'm looking for a
way to clear the cache from Apache for specific URLs. I'm using Apache to cache
dynamic content that is served by Tomcat, and I would like to keep the content
(age) high (e.g. 24 ho
Why do you think using request headers would not work?
From: Tamer Embaby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 1:39 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: Clearing cache selectively on Apache + mod_cache
Karim,
I'm afraid you have to do that programmati
That sounds like a possible way to go. However, this spills into another
question. I have the CacheIgnoreCacheControl directive set to "On" for
mod_cache. I know that this means "no-cache" is ignored in the request. Does it
also ignore "max-age", or can I force the cache to clear by using "max-a
50 matches
Mail list logo
