g Ok that didnt work either. Moved it again to the windows directory
and restarted everything and still nothing. This must be a bad trick that my
computer is playing on me. Does it have anything to do with windows vista?
And yes I finally turned off the user account control. Im pas
Xpert Advice wrote:
> Ok time to start banging my head against the wall. So I turned off the
> user account controls and tried everything again...still didnt work.
> when i run the test page im still getting this:
>
> Configuration File (php.ini) Path C:\Windows
>
> Loaded Configuration Fil
Ok time to start banging my head against the wall. So I turned off the user
account controls and tried everything again...still didnt work. when i run the
test page im still getting this:
Configuration File (php.ini) Path C:\Windows
Loaded Configuration File (none)
I really dont know
Ok Im a little speciall William...I completely forgot about this messy UAC. Im
going to turn this off right now but let me make sure I understand you. If I
leave the UAC on then change the PHPIniDir "C:/Windows" to PHPIniDir
"C:/Apache2.2/conf". Otherwise take off the UAC and then restart
On Sep 25, 2008, at 7:52 PM, Xpert Advice wrote:
Ok I think we've stumbled onto the problem. I think you may be
right it may be a file permission problem because I have moved this
php.ini file everywhere. I moved it to the apache2.2/bin folder
restarted the computer restarted apache didn
Xpert Advice wrote:
> Ok I think we've stumbled onto the problem. I think you may be right it
> may be a file permission problem because I have moved this php.ini file
> everywhere. I moved it to the apache2.2/bin folder restarted the
> computer restarted apache didnt work. I moved it to c:/wind
Ok I think we've stumbled onto the problem. I think you may be right it may be
a file permission problem because I have moved this php.ini file everywhere. I
moved it to the apache2.2/bin folder restarted the computer restarted apache
didnt work. I moved it to c:/windows folder restarted comp
Having copies of php.ini laying around that are not being used is not
your problem.
Not sure what produced the output in your first email. Create a
phpinfo.php file and put it somewhere apache has access to it.
Make the contents of phpinfo.php the following:
Load the phpinfo.php served by
Hello Apache-users!
I've got an apache server on an older RedHat box (RH 3.2.2-5). The
apache version is 2.0.40 (old, I know).
One process seems to keep going to 99% cpu usage. This persists
through reboots, restarts of the daemon, etc. I've tried disabling
modules and I can't seem to get it to
Thank You S much for your quick response. I've actually moved that php.ini
file several times I actually do currently have it in the C:\\Windows folder
and I have restarded everything since and for some reason its still not able to
locate. Now i never deleted the original from C\\php\php.i
On 25 Sep 2008, at 22:18, Xpert Advice wrote:
Fatal error: Call to undefined function mysqli_connect() in C:
\Apache2.2\htdocs\mysql_up.php on line 13
2. The php.ini file is currently located at c:/php/php.ini
Configuration File (php.ini) Path C:\Windows
The above states that PHP is
Put php.ini in the apache/bin directory, php is running as an apache module.
Sent from my BlackBerry� wireless device
-Original Message-
From: Xpert Advice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:18:28
To:
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Not Sure If This Is An Appache Problem Or a PHP
Hello,
I am trying to test that php is working properly with apache and with mysql and
I keep getting the following error:
Fatal error: Call to undefined function mysqli_connect() in
C:\Apache2.2\htdocs\mysql_up.php on line 13
Now I have done absolutely everything that I have read in all of the
On Sep 25, 2008, at 12:03 PM, Carsten Wiedmann wrote:
Chris Pratt schrieb:
Hello, I have reason to add an additional IP temporarily to a
Virtual Host. I looked on the latest Apache 2.2 Documentation
and found that while the documentation
allows for multiple IP addresses, the NameVirtualHost
d
Chris Pratt schrieb:
> Hello, I have reason to add an additional IP temporarily to a
> Virtual Host. I looked on the latest Apache 2.2 Documentation
> and found that while the documentation
> allows for multiple IP addresses, the NameVirtualHost
> documentation allows for only one IP:Port combinat
> NameVirtualHost directive allow multiple IP:Ports to be specified even
> though the documentation suggests otherwise?
I guess you have proplem understanding what NameVirtualHost actually is.
With this directive you basically ask the Apache to match the vhost from
request made by client- if one
Christian Lerrahn wrote:
> is there a way to configure Apache as to not log requests from certain
> IP addresses?
Yes, conditional logging is what you're looking for.
SetEnvIf Remote_Addr "the\.ip\.address\.here" dontlog
...
CustomLog /where/you/want/your/log combined env=!dontlog
Davide
--
Sy
Chris Pratt wrote:
> Hello, I have reason to add an additional IP temporarily to a
> Virtual Host. I looked on the latest Apache 2.2 Documentation
> and found that while the documentation
> allows for multiple IP addresses, the NameVirtualHost
> documentation allows for only one IP:Port combinatio
Hello, I have reason to add an additional IP temporarily to a
Virtual Host. I looked on the latest Apache 2.2 Documentation
and found that while the documentation
allows for multiple IP addresses, the NameVirtualHost
documentation allows for only one IP:Port combination. It goes
on to say that th
Hi,
is there a way to configure Apache as to not log requests from certain
IP addresses? I'd like to make sure that mirroring by a certain machine
does not show up in my log files because my site has plenty of files
and I will clog up a lot of logs with mirroring if I log as usual.
Cheers,
Christi
n Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Tom Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> no-keepalive is the environment variable you want to set
>^
> No dash, surely? Pretty sure it is just 'nokeepalive'.
you're right -- dunno how I managed to load/include the URL and still
manage to get it wrong
>
>>
>
Curious how this could be accomplished, I have tried several ideas using url
rewrite and proxying, without the desired effect.
I have two URL Locations specified in httpd.conf, but want to reverse proxy
them both to the same location. We haave this working currently. The trick
now is to make th
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 11:03 -0400, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Justin Pasher
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > howard chen wrote:
> >>
> >> Currently I have an runtime environment variable to tell if a client
> >> want keepalive or not, specified by their cookie value,
>
Just a follow up that we got this working using Locations and url patterns.
After enabling both mod_ssl (with client certs) and mod_authnz_ldap, we do
and
each doing it's own flavor or authentication, then reverse proxying both
requests to our app server
ProxyPass http://localhost:8080/
Prox
Hi
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 11:03 PM, Eric Covener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> no-keepalive is the environment variable you want to set
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/env.html#special
Great Thanks.
-
The official User-To-
howard chen wrote:
Currently I have an runtime environment variable to tell if a client
want keepalive or not, specified by their cookie value,
e.g.
RewriteCond %{HTTP_COOKIE} ^.*NO_KEEPALIVE=TRUE.*$
RewriteRule ^.*$ - [E=NO_KEEPALIVE:1]
Is it possible, based on the environment variable to ru
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Justin Pasher
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> howard chen wrote:
>>
>> Currently I have an runtime environment variable to tell if a client
>> want keepalive or not, specified by their cookie value,
>>
>> e.g.
>>
>> RewriteCond %{HTTP_COOKIE} ^.*NO_KEEPALIVE=TRUE.*$
>
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 9:26 AM, André Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric Covener wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> IMO The 403 is returned in a path where errors imply a high likelyhood
>> of someone actively trying to fool the server -- I don't think a 403
>> is too inappropriate here.
>>
> First, no,
Eric Covener wrote:
[...]
IMO The 403 is returned in a path where errors imply a high likelyhood
of someone actively trying to fool the server -- I don't think a 403
is too inappropriate here.
First, no, there was no tomfoolery implicated in copying the file. Just
take an existing Apache logo
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 8:23 AM, André Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In that respect, yes you should. The client should not have to know on
> which platform the server is running, and send a fundamentally different URL
> depending.
You don't have to know the platform. You have to know the
Eric Covener wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 5:00 AM, #V[Á]lentín <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In any case, thanks for bringing this problem up. I have been using
Apache for a very long time, and I am also not an native English-speaker. I
can't imagine that I have not encountered the same issue
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 5:00 AM, #V[Á]lentín <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In any case, thanks for bringing this problem up. I have been using
>> Apache for a very long time, and I am also not an native English-speaker. I
>> can't imagine that I have not encountered the same issue before, so I c
Hi,
I was just looking for details on mod_auth_form, it sounds a really
interesting new feature. I understand it's for 2.4 but any idea when that
will be? Is a stable module likely to be released prior to 2.4?
Thanks,
Nick
Thanks you for trying to revive this case in Apache bugzilla.
2008/9/25 André Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi.
>
> I searched the Apache bugzilla database and came up with a similar issue
> posted a while ago (bug # 18805). I posted an additional comment there,
> describing the issue as we see
Hi.
I searched the Apache bugzilla database and came up with a similar issue
posted a while ago (bug # 18805). I posted an additional comment there,
describing the issue as we see it, in the hope that it will revive the case.
I will also try to start another thread here dedicated to such URL
35 matches
Mail list logo
