[EMAIL PROTECTED] Is nokeepalive, force-response-1.0 still necessary for ie ?

2008-04-09 Thread fredk2
Hi, The default Apache httpd.conf (all versions e.g 2.2.x, 1.3.20+) has the following line SetEnvIf User-Agent ".*MSIE.*" nokeepalive ssl-unclean-shutdown downgrade-1.0 force-response-1.0 This is documented at http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/ssl/ssl_faq.html#msie Is this still necessary when

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Why does type-maps rely on MultiViews?

2008-04-09 Thread Daniel Aleksandersen
Hi list, Why does type-maps rely on multiviews to be enabled? I can sort of understand why it is required to match [../resource] with [../resource.var]. BUT as type maps are presented as an alternate to multiviews in the documentation; I find it strange that it still requires multiviews to work

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Log entry validity

2008-04-09 Thread Jonathan Mast
I was wondering just how accurate the entries in the httpd logs are, specifically whether or not they may be double counting some requests. We developed an adserver for client and before we connect it to a database, the only way we can count the number of times it has been called is by searching t

[EMAIL PROTECTED] .cgi as DirectoryIndex?

2008-04-09 Thread Israel Brewster
I have a .cgi script that I would like to use as the DirectoryIndex for a location on my web server, preferably with the trailing ?abc= argument attached (although without would work too). I thought I might just be able to put the .cgi file as the DirectoryIndex directive for the directory,

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem with DirectoryIndex in Apache 1.3.41

2008-04-09 Thread Wendlick, Daniel P
I'm having a problem using the DirectoryIndex directive in Apache 1.3.41. Basically, it doesn't work. If I access the site as www.site.org, it correctly redirects to www.site.org/. It however returns a 404 error instead of the index.html Page. If I access the page directly, www.site.org/index.h

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 using custom openssl install

2008-04-09 Thread Spangler, Tim
Hello, I'm trying to configure Apache to point to openssl 0.9.8g on a 64bit install of SLES 10. I've installed openssl 0.9.8g to /app/openssl/0.9.8g and /usr/local/ssl with the --shared option, and have added /app/openssl/0.9.8g/lib to /etc/ld.so.conf and run ldconfig. As far as I can tell, the d

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Site swapping on search engine

2008-04-09 Thread EJMcLeod
Hey Guys, I have a little problem. I registered one of the two sites I'm hosting off my server with a search engine. Now the thing is linking directly to pages from my other sight. How do I keep the search engines from looking at anything other than the main page of the sight. I don't want t

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] client certification config (root and intermediate cert)

2008-04-09 Thread Serge Dubrouski
I don't think that you can have several SLCACertificateFile options and that all of then well be used by Apache. Try to use SSLCACertificatePath instead. See documentation on ssl_mod for instructions on how to correctly put CA certs into that directory. On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Christopher

[EMAIL PROTECTED] client certification config (root and intermediate cert)

2008-04-09 Thread Christopher Ljungblad
Hi, I am having problems with a client certification, having two certificates (root and intermediate) as you can see below. When I try to sign this certificate I get this error: [Wed Apr 09 15:53:35 2008] [error] Certificate Verification: Error (2): unable to get issuer certificate [Wed Apr 09 1

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rewrite all but one page

2008-04-09 Thread Matthew Tice
> > RewriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} 80 > RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/+partners/+video\.php > RewriteRule ^/partners(.*)$ > https://testvideo101.example.com/partners$1[R,NC] > > Mike > Thanks Mike, that did it. One question. Are the '+' necessar

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rewrite all but one page

2008-04-09 Thread Mike Cardwell
Matthew Tice wrote: Hello, I feel like this is an easy one - but it's throwing me off. I have my webserver behind a netscaler load balancer. The netscaler handles the SSL traffic and redirects the decrypted traffic to port 81. I need to redirect all traffic except a certain page. The rewrit

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Rewrite all but one page

2008-04-09 Thread Matthew Tice
Hello, I feel like this is an easy one - but it's throwing me off. I have my webserver behind a netscaler load balancer. The netscaler handles the SSL traffic and redirects the decrypted traffic to port 81. I need to redirect all traffic except a certain page. The rewrite rule I have is this:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spesifyinng a fallback for content negotiation

2008-04-09 Thread Daniel Aleksandersen
Hi list, Is it possible to spesify a default fallback when content negotiation fail? Regarding language, file format, charset, and compression. -- Daniel Aleksandersen - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTT

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content negotiation and IE7

2008-04-09 Thread Daniel Aleksandersen
Fri, 04 Apr 2008 10:48:49 +0200 (CEST), Daniel Aleksandersen: > Hi list, > > IE 7 and 8b, and newer versions of Safari sends HTTP "Accept: */*" headers. > How to deal with these browsers when working with content negotiation? I have > three different types available: > application/xhtml+xml; qs=

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Comma and semicolon parameters for content negotiation

2008-04-09 Thread Daniel Aleksandersen
Tue, 8 Apr 2008 14:18:45 -0400, Joshua Slive: > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 10:05 AM, Daniel Aleksandersen > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Inspired by > > http://h3h.net/2007/01/designing-urls-for-multilingual-web-sites/#method-07 > > and > > http://h3h.net/2007/01/designing-urls-for-mu

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Odd character behavior

2008-04-09 Thread Krist van Besien
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Gary Smithe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Best I can tell, it's an ANSI, extended ASCII, MS Windows type of thing. Probably indeed some difference between default character sets on your windows and debian boxes. And probably the html files don't contain any indicati