In our environment we stream all the Apache logs to a central syslog
server. I recently wrote a program in perl to auto separate the logs
per application name. Here is the program I wrote if you are
interested: http://www.ilive4unix.net/doku.php/code/perl/logsplitter.pl
Travis Sidelinger
J
Thanks Joshua
Regards,
David Crellin
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Slive [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 7 February 2008 3:20 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] URI file extensions / suffixes
On Feb 6, 2008 8:08 PM, David Crellin <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Feb 10, 2008 2:30 PM, Gary W. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> We use the following for hosting several sites by domain name and it seems
> to work well for us.
>
> VirtualDocumentRoot /exports/home/%-2.0.%-1/virtualdomains/%0
>
> What we would like to do is to split the incomin
Hello,
We use the following for hosting several sites by domain name and it seems to
work well for us.
VirtualDocumentRoot /exports/home/%-2.0.%-1/virtualdomains/%0
What we would like to do is to split the incoming logs for each of the base
level domains (that is domain.tld, regardless of *
Ah indeed - I missed the Alias line from my 2.0 configuration.
Thanks
On 10/02/2008, Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 15:49:16 +
> "Ben Hussey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > In version 2.0 relative and non-relative local paths were handled fine
> > (/ at start with
Hi
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 11:23 -0500, Sailesh Krishnamurthy wrote:
> Thanks for that input, what I am looking for is more along the lines
> of what would be the benefit of a web server farm, what would be the
> design considerations and so on...
How long have you got?
The design considerations o
Hi Hans,
Thanks for that input, what I am looking for is more along the lines of what
would be the benefit of a web server farm, what would be the design
considerations and so on...
Thanks
On Feb 8, 2008 11:10 PM, Hans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sailesh Krishnamurthy wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 15:49:16 +
"Ben Hussey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In version 2.0 relative and non-relative local paths were handled fine
> (/ at start with non-relative, without was relative) is this a bug in
> 2.2 or have I missed something?
Indeed, 2.2 behaves as you describe. Both
NO, this is not an FAQ!
The apache 2.2.3 coming with CentOS 5 cannot identify name-based virtual
hosts for SSL anymore. It goes straight to the first virtual host. This
worked with Apache 1.3 and still works with Apache 2.0. I just started
investigating what I need to change moving from 2.0 to
Is it possible to get local paths to work non-relatively? (Apache 2.2)
Here are the relevant parts of my config and the result:
>
> ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> VirtualDocumentRoot /web/live/%1/
>
>
> ErrorDocument 400 /web/error/error.php?code=400
> ErrorDocument 403 /web/error/erro
On Feb 9, 2008 10:40 PM, sudhakar govindavajhala
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Apache is a pre-forking server. It keeps a pool of processes available
> > to serve incoming requests and therefore doesn't need to start new
> > processes for each new connection. As your process listing shows, al
11 matches
Mail list logo
