Hey Peter,
Your web interface functionality sounds quite sexy.
We seem to have about your size when hits are concerned,
split over dozens of https applications.
We are more concentrating on releases. Behind there is a
a svn repository we use to work on the code (dedicated dev
boxes). When a pr
Hi list. I'm experiencing the same problem with mod_auth_radius, but I
can't find anywhere what the "AuthBasicProvider" directive should be for
that module (no, unfortunately "radius" doesn't work :P)
Apache version is 2.2.3 running on Debian Etch, mod_auth_radius-2.0.c
version is 1.5.7
Than
Hi everyone
I apologize in advance if I ramble/dont get to the point, my girlfriend says
I do that a lot.
I just installed 2.2.6 on Windows XP with the intention of testing various
websites being written on the local machine. I am having a few problems and
I think they arise from my inexperience w
Hi,
I see a difference in the way Apache responds to a Expect:
100-continue header in version 1.3.33 vs 2.2.6. The 1.3.33 handling is
correct. I feel the 2.2.6 handling is a bug.
For PUT requests with a Expect: 100-continue header, Apache 2.2.6
server sends a HTTP/1.1 100 Continue response before
Joshua Slive wrote:
> Assuming you are using 2.x, you can use a negative-lookahead in the
> regex to match exactly anything other than robots.txt. But the effect
> will be the same.
Thank you so much, that's just what I'm looking for. Following your
advice, finally, I changed my httpd.conf like th
On 10/15/07, ImageCity/Hirotsuna Mizuno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> joy d wrote:
> > You can use mod_rewrite and define a RewriteCond for the except case.
>
> Thank you for your appropriate advice.
>
> Unfortunately, our Apache server was compiled without mod_rewrite, and
> it's not allowed to re-
joy d wrote:
> You can use mod_rewrite and define a RewriteCond for the except case.
Thank you for your appropriate advice.
Unfortunately, our Apache server was compiled without mod_rewrite, and
it's not allowed to re-compile it. Therefore, the following way is our
current candidate.
RedirectM
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Who do i contact to get this issue solved? I did not see any contact
email in the source and i am too lame to understand cgid sources.
The project is aware of this "deficiency" in the cgid daemon.
Well, i guess so, because first bug report on
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Who do i contact to get this issue solved? I did not see any contact email
in the source and i am too lame to understand cgid sources.
The project is aware of this "deficiency" in the cgid daemon.
-
The of
Issac Goldstand wrote:
> For what it's worth, I use SVN with isolated dev sandboxes working with
> trunk (or some branch). The production boxes have a webroot for staging
> (for detecting anything that might happen to manage to work differently
> in sandbox and production) and live sites. Each ro
Artem Kuchin wrote:
I have submitted a bug report about this 1-2 years ago and
decided to check this issue today in otder to switch to
worker mpm.
The problem is that when using cgid and print to stderr,
say, like this
fprintf(stderr,"Hello error log!");
the messages goes into main server log, n
Johnny, thank you so much. That answered all my questions. You're a
life saver :)
On 10/15/07, Johnny Kewl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ---
> HARBOR: http://coolharbor.100free.com/index.htm
> Now Tomcat is also a cool applic
For what it's worth, I use SVN with isolated dev sandboxes working with
trunk (or some branch). The production boxes have a webroot for staging
(for detecting anything that might happen to manage to work differently
in sandbox and production) and live sites. Each root is an svn copy,
and there's
we have use NFS for a few farms here with simiar setup. rsync is between the
dev boxes and NFS servers only.
- Original Message -
From: Peter Milanese
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 2:28 PM
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Farm Ideas
Greetings-
Greetings-
I am coming up with ideas for building a new farm. We currently run CF and
Apache on a bunch of decent sized boxes, headed by a set of F5's. We have an
isolated Dev Environment. The current framework for putting stuff into
production is homegrown, and in need of an overhaul, I ju
Thank you,
I thought it had something about reverse lookup but wasn't sure.
=== Richard Bates
On Oct 15, 2007, at 1:48 PM, Aaron Dalton wrote:
You can never have more than one SSL host on any given IP/Port
combination.
You can never have more than one SSL host on any given IP/Port
combination. This has nothing to do with your web server but with the way
SSL itself is constructed.
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/ssl/ssl_faq.html#vhosts
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/ssl/ssl_faq.html#vhosts2
--
Aaron Dalton
I am trying to set up a server that has two(2) ssl sites.
If I remember correctly, A long time ago Apache 1.3.9
you could only do one SSL site on a server.
I downloaded Apache 2.2.6.
Has this changed? if so how do I do it.
I can't find the statement saying weather you can do more than one or
I apologize for implying anything about your emotions. Maybe I am the
only one weeping over RFCs . Bad specifications cause physical pain
to me. - solprovider
On 10/15/07, Axel-Stephane SMORGRAV
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Obviously the original poster has an application that only returns the d
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:30:44 +0200
Robert Jaeschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why does mod_proxy behave this way? Is there a way to change the
> behaviour? Do workarounds exist?
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41798
Stay tuned. I've been fixing quite a lot of mod_proxy bugs.
> From: Nick Kew on Saturday, October 13, 2007 5:02 AM
>
> On 13 Oct 2007, at 05:43, Steve Bardsley wrote:
>
> > Guys, please ignore the previous patch. There's still a problem.
It's
> > possibly due to cleansing of debug messages. I'll be sure we get the
> > next one right. Sorry for the wasted
Obviously the original poster has an application that only returns the domain
part in the cookie domain, hence the lack of rewriting despite
ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain.
and no I do not make a habit of weeping over RFCs.
-ascs
-Message d'origin
Hi,
I have some problems with mod_proxy_html on Solaris.
On Solaris 9 (Apache 2.2.4 and Apache 2.0.55, libxml2-2.6.30) , I've
encountered the following problem with mod_proxy_html. I have
downloaded, built and installed the mod_proxy_html release ( it seems to
be released 2007-07-31). It should
Distinguishing between FQDN and Domain is barely relevant when
discussing Cookies. RFC2965 states, "Domain Defaults to the
request-host." Cookies default to using the FQDN as the Domain if the
Domain is not specified. Specified domains must start with a period,
must be exactly one level below th
I am trying to use ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain to reverse proxy a
server that uses Cookies without specifying DOMAIN. Does anybody know
how?
---
[The rest of this post probably belongs on a dev ML.]
I found the code:
DOWNLOAD: httpd-2.2.6-win32-src-r2
FILE: modules/proxy/proxy_util.c
FUNCTION:
I have submitted a bug report about this 1-2 years ago and
decided to check this issue today in otder to switch to
worker mpm.
The problem is that when using cgid and print to stderr,
say, like this
fprintf(stderr,"Hello error log!");
the messages goes into main server log, not into virtual serve
The behaviour observed by the original poster is correct: www.example.com is
the host FQDN - not the domain. The cookie _domain_ is example.com.
A cookie which domain is example.com will be submitted by the UA to both
www1.example.com and www.example.com. The conclusion is that no rewriting of
An "example.com" Cookie will be sent to www.example.com and www1.example.com.
Questions for troubleshooting:
Is www.example.com receiving the Cookie? (Should be yes.)
Is www.example.com sending the Cookie when proxying to
www1.example.com? Is www1.example.com receiving the Cookie? (Both
should
On 15.10.2007, at 02:36, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Torsten Curdt wrote:
Hmmm ...better to ask on the dev list?
Where does -no-cpp-precomp come from? That's weird!
Well my configure says
Applying APR hints file rules for i386-apple-darwin8.10.1
adding "-DDARWIN" to CPPFLAGS
adding
J R M schrieb:
I've recently had a request from one of our clients to provide their logs
in the 'Extended W3C Log Format'.
From poking around google and reading
http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-logfile.html the fomat looks awfully strange.
Is it possible to configure Apache in a way to create logfile
30 matches
Mail list logo
