Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] avoiding a redirect loop with rewrites

Josh Trutwin wrote: > On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:36:03 + > matt farey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> RewriteEngine On >> ReWriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} pid5.html$ >> ReWriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} !stop=yes >> ReWriteRule . /products.html [R=301] >> ReWriteRule ^products.html$ /pages/pid5.htm

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache 1.3 on Windows 2003

Thanks for the input, but I'll be moving along. I have reasons for keeping things status quo, and not going to upgrade at this time. -Original Message- From: Mark Lavi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: February 22, 2007 6:52 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Insta

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] avoiding a redirect loop with rewrites

On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:36:03 + matt farey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > RewriteEngine On > ReWriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} pid5.html$ > ReWriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} !stop=yes > ReWriteRule . /products.html [R=301] > ReWriteRule ^products.html$ /pages/pid5.html?stop=yes [L,QSA] Thanks Matt - I'l

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy_ftp

Hi, I have following problems with mod_proxy_ftp: 1) I'm reverse-proxying a ftp server with a national charset and all non-english links are broken(Bad Request) 2) Links that consist of two(or more) words separated by spaces look also incorrect, for example: if there is a folder "some files", i

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache 1.3 on Windows 2003

For techguy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pwned -- you'll get the idea. --Mark Mark Lavi, Enterprise Web Management Team @ SGI mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] || phone:+1-650-933-7707 -Original Message- From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 3:56

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache 1.3 on Windows 2003

Techguy wrote: > > I used this website to configure PHP. > http://www.thesitewizard.com/archive/php4install.shtml He last updated that 7 March 2003. Maybe you should ask him? Or perhaps read modern instructions instead. - Th

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache 1.3 on Windows 2003

Techguy wrote: > Now that everyone has got their opinions out of the way of how behind I am, > is their a way to get this to work? To the person who said "I doubt it's > your box anymore", Why?? It is and it works, and to WOW everyone even more, > it's running beautifully on a 366 with 256 megs of

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache 1.3 on Windows 2003

Why update? 1) Security patches. You missed the subtle reference that older versions of Apache are vulnerable and therefore could compromise your system. 2) Apache 1.3x is abandoned on Win32 platforms, 2.2.x is current. See http://www.wmwweb.com/apache/httpd/binaries/win32/ for part of the expl

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache 1.3 on Windows 2003

Now that everyone has got their opinions out of the way of how behind I am, is their a way to get this to work? To the person who said "I doubt it's your box anymore", Why?? It is and it works, and to WOW everyone even more, it's running beautifully on a 366 with 256 megs of ram. It never crashes,

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] avoiding a redirect loop with rewrites

Josh Trutwin wrote: > Hi, > > I'm working for a small company that uses a custom CMS. When > customers create pages in the CMS a file gets created based on the > page's id number - for example: > > www.mysite.com/pages/pid5.html > > I've pushed some code into the CMS that lets the site admin cre

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache 1.3 on Windows 2003

At 11:54 AM 2/22/2007, Techguy wrote: It works, PHP doesn't - and since I have 1.3 on my Linux box I want to keep them the same, and I don't plan on upgrading Linux. If it isn't broke, don't mess with it. With security holes, exploits, etc, do you REALLY want to run a OLD version of Apache?

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache 1.3 on Windows 2003

Pid wrote: > Techguy wrote: >> It works, PHP doesn't - and since I have 1.3 on my Linux box I want to keep >> them the same, and I don't plan on upgrading Linux. If it isn't broke, don't >> mess with it. If you are really running apache 1.3.5 on your linux box, and corresponding software from that

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache 1.3 on Windows 2003

The crux of the matter is that it is **very hard** to support every version throughout time. I'd argue it's an impossible effort and impractical. Compound every *current* Apache version, every Apache module, every operating system, every dependent library, and you've got today's snapshot of a supp

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache 1.3 on Windows 2003

Techguy wrote: It works, PHP doesn't - and since I have 1.3 on my Linux box I want to keep them the same, and I don't plan on upgrading Linux. If it isn't broke, don't mess with it. if everyone did that, we'd still be banging flints together. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache 1.3 on Windows 2003

It works, PHP doesn't - and since I have 1.3 on my Linux box I want to keep them the same, and I don't plan on upgrading Linux. If it isn't broke, don't mess with it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Slive Sent: February 22, 2007 1

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache 1.3 on Windows 2003

On 2/22/07, Techguy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I just installed Apache 1.3.5 on Windows 2003 Don't do that. Apache 1.3 on Windows is dead. Use 2.2. Jsohua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Serv

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache 1.3 on Windows 2003

I just installed Apache 1.3.5 on Windows 2003, and when I tested it it worked, but when I tried to install PHP I can't start the server anymore. The apache server on the local machine started and then stopped... I used this website to configure PHP.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] avoiding a redirect loop with rewrites

Hi, I'm working for a small company that uses a custom CMS. When customers create pages in the CMS a file gets created based on the page's id number - for example: www.mysite.com/pages/pid5.html I've pushed some code into the CMS that lets the site admin create a nice URL for each page so you g

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Does "AllowOverride All" damage Apache performance?

On many systems the htaccess files will tend to stay in cache - if not the systems's memory cache then the disk subsystem's cache. The busier the server gets, the more likely this is to be true, because it uses the one htaccess file for references to all other files in the directory. So there is v

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Does "AllowOverride All" damage Apache performance?

On 2/22/07, thomas Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi. One colleague claims that if we set "AllowOverride All" within our httpd.conf, the performance of Apache (we use 2.0.59) is damaged. Is this true? Any suggestion is welcome. As discussed here: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/misc/pe

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Does "AllowOverride All" damage Apache performance?

On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:50:30 +0100 "thomas Armstrong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi. > > One colleague claims that if we set "AllowOverride All" within our > httpd.conf, the performance of Apache (we use 2.0.59) is damaged. Yes, though it's not the whole truth. Any Allowoverride value other t

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "(8)Exec format error: exec of 'test.php' failed" when ScriptAlias

Easier (within httpd.conf): AddHandler application/x-httpd-php .php --- Thank you very much anyway! On 2/22/07, Eric Covener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 2/22/07, thomas Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 51a8:1409:18d7:afbf:20df:9300:a00:0] (8)Exec

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Does "AllowOverride All" damage Apache performance?

Hi. One colleague claims that if we set "AllowOverride All" within our httpd.conf, the performance of Apache (we use 2.0.59) is damaged. Is this true? Any suggestion is welcome. - The official User-To-User support forum of the

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Proxypass bad routing

Hi All Using apache mod_proxy 2.2.0 on Solaris 8. Imagine a web page where the overall content is delivered by a webserver A, and an IFrame in this page is delivered by a server B. To route the request on the appropriate server, I use the following proxypass commands in apache 2.2.0, used as a pr

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] setting up virtual hosting

matt farey wrote: >Sam Carleton wrote: > > >>On 2/22/07, Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> I am back at it and it simply is NOT working. No matter what I do, I cannot get to the default web site. >>>It is not clear what you mean by "default web site".

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] setting up virtual hosting

Sam Carleton wrote: > On 2/22/07, Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > I am back at it and it simply is NOT working. No matter what I do, I >> > cannot get to the default web site. >> >> It is not clear what you mean by "default web site". Once you start >> using VHs, the "default web si

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] setting up virtual hosting

Sam Carleton wrote: > On 2/22/07, Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > I am back at it and it simply is NOT working. No matter what I do, I >> > cannot get to the default web site. >> >> It is not clear what you mean by "default web site". Once you start >> using VHs, the "default web si

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "(8)Exec format error: exec of 'test.php' failed" when ScriptAlias

On 2/22/07, thomas Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 51a8:1409:18d7:afbf:20df:9300:a00:0] (8)Exec format error: exec of '/home/project/modules/videos/web/test.php' failed Perhaps you need a shebang (!#/usr/bin...) line at the top of the PHP script so the interpreter can be found? -- Eric Co

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] setting up virtual hosting

On 2/22/07, Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am back at it and it simply is NOT working. No matter what I do, I > cannot get to the default web site. It is not clear what you mean by "default web site". Once you start using VHs, the "default web site" becomes the *first* VH in the con

[EMAIL PROTECTED] "(8)Exec format error: exec of 'test.php' failed" when ScriptAlias

Hi, Using Apache 2.0.59 on Linux, I try to install a ScriptAlias. My DocumentRoot is '/home/project/web', and the ScriptAlias directive within httpd.conf is: - ScriptAlias /videos/ /home/project/modules/videos/web/ - But when accessing with my web-browser to 'http://foo/videos/test.php'

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache on Mac OS X 10.3.9 Server

To summarize the scenario thus far I have heard the following: 1. Check the persistent connections. 2. Server caching - 2 places. 3. image expiry. As far as #1, the server is set with the default settings that had previously been fine. Max simultaneous connections : 500 Max persistent connection

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] custom log files and directories?

On Thursday, February 22, 2007 2:13 AM [GMT+1=CET], William Kronert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I want to direct the access logs from one directory to a custom log > file. Is this possible? Example would be: > > www.example.com/dirA > www.example.com/dirB > > I wish to have all the f