Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Performance on mod_proxy?

On 1/22/07, Lucas Brasilino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am not sure how good Apache mod_proxy on its > Load-Balance and Failover, in regarding its > Performance, Capacity Limit, Security, etc? Can > someone help me? As 2.2 mod_proxy is production stable, it's surely reliable. But talking

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy

Hi, I am trying to use a reverse proxy with mod_proxy under Windows, and it give a 400 error telling that the following header line doesn't contain a ":" character when trying to access the back-end server through it: GET / HTTP/1.1 Well, this line shouldn't contain a : character and I don't

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache gives SSL Library error complaining about common name - Help

On 1/22/07, DEVAL SHAH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, Thanks for the reply but this is my config: #SSLVerifyClient require SSLVerifyDepth 10 so it is commented out and the default is SSLVerifyClient none. Also I tried using SSLVerifyClient none but that didnt work either. Don't know what t

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache gives SSL Library error complaining about common name - Help

Hello, Thanks for the reply but this is my config: #SSLVerifyClient require SSLVerifyDepth 10 so it is commented out and the default is SSLVerifyClient none. Also I tried using SSLVerifyClient none but that didnt work either. Any other idea? Can this be related to machine configuration. Thank

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache gives SSL Library error complaining about common name - Help

Ok. I believe that the problem in in the proxy. Client certificates AREN'T proxied. As far as I remember, you have you server configured with "SSLVerifyClient Required", that means that client MUST provide a certificate to get access, but their proxy doesn't ask for it and doesn't peresnt it tou y

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache gives alert bad certificate error

Hello, I have posted this question earlier but got no response. I am stating it again. Please help with some ideas. I have a certificate installed for my domain from Thawte. Now if anyone tries to access the webpage using a browser it works perfect. One of our clients has a proxy server. When th

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache gives SSL Library error complaining about common name - Help

Hello, I have posted this question earlier but got no response. I am stating it again. Please help with some ideas. I have a certificate installed for my domain from Thawte. Now if anyone tries to access the webpage using a browser it works perfect. One of our clients has a proxy server. When th

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Issues installing PHP

I have included the event log for you after following the instructions: 1:22:07 at 17:31:01 The Apache service named reported the following error: >>> httpd.exe: Syntax error on line 115 of C:/Program Files/Apache Software Foundation/Apache2.2/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot load C:/Program Files/Apache

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] is it possible ? (ssl-tunneling)

On Jan 22, 2007, at 2:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is it possible to have the connection between the client and the reverse proxy encrypted with ssl and authorization basic ? smth like ssh-tunneling ? example : client < SSL > Apache <-> origin server

[EMAIL PROTECTED] is it possible ? (ssl-tunneling)

Hi, is it possible to have the connection between the client and the reverse proxy encrypted with ssl and authorization basic ? smth like ssh-tunneling ? example : client < SSL > Apache <-> origin server reversed

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Performance under mod_proxy

From: "Sander Temme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Try connecting with a client that shows you exactly the response headers, like Curl or IE with IEWatch. I have tried, but I can see only the headers sent to the proxy, and those returned by the proxy. I cannot see the headers sent by the proxy to the

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Auth via LDAPS fails: Can't contact LDAP server

On 1/22/07, Darren Spruell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1/17/07, Darren Spruell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When trying to authenticate clients via a remote LDAP directory (using > mod_authz_ldap), we fail and the following is logged: > > [Wed Jan 17 14:57:14 2007] [warn] [client a.b.c.d] [3249

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] VIRTUAL HOSTS

What i really meant is; I would like it to serve the same files as the main server. That is declare its document root as the same as the main server. But it is not the main server. Thanks Bashiro --- On Mon 01/22, Davide Bianchi < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: From: Davide Bianchi [mailto: [EMAIL

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_authn_dbd and MySQL

We are attempting to setup auth using mod_authn_dbd and MySql 5.x on WINXP. Started right off with an invalid command 'DBDriver' on the conf line: DBDriver mysql Likewise error with DBDriver pgsql. Also, I see that there has been a recent bug report about the MySQL driver not bei

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Performance on mod_proxy?

On Jan 22, 2007, at 10:00 AM, Octavian Rasnita wrote: Hi, Of course the back end server is working. It was working without a proxy, and I haven't changed anything on it. I've just put it to run on another port, and without a named virtual host, but an IP- based one on localhost:83. I've

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Performance on mod_proxy?

Hi, Of course the back end server is working. It was working without a proxy, and I haven't changed anything on it. I've just put it to run on another port, and without a named virtual host, but an IP-based one on localhost:83. I've made a telnet connection to it on port 83, and it is working

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Forbidden web pages

On Jan 22, 2007, at 9:30 AM, Lowe, Grant wrote: Well, what works is http://localhost/mrtg. The others don't work. Here's the mrtg.conf file in case. <..snip..> Allow from 127.0.0.1 Allow from ::1 And this is surprising in what way? The mtrg.conf file specifies exactly that the m

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Auth via LDAPS fails: Can't contact LDAP server

On 1/17/07, Darren Spruell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: When trying to authenticate clients via a remote LDAP directory (using mod_authz_ldap), we fail and the following is logged: [Wed Jan 17 14:57:14 2007] [warn] [client a.b.c.d] [32492] auth_ldap authenticate: user authentication faile

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Forbidden web pages

Well, what works is http://localhost/mrtg. The others don't work. Here's the mrtg.conf file in case. # Alias /mrtg /var/www/mrtg Alias /mrtg /var/www/html/mrtg Order deny,allow Deny from all Allow from 127.0.0.1 Allow from ::1 # Allow from .example.com Thanks for the help!

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Forbidden web pages

On Jan 22, 2007, at 9:05 AM, Lowe, Grant wrote: Ok. I got this problem solved (finally). It turns out that there is a mrtg.conf file I had to edit. This file was pointing to the wrong directory. I can now see my mrtg graphs ok…but with one little caveat. Only if I enter localhost/mrtg

[EMAIL PROTECTED] MP3 Access -- Log Analysis

We have been having some server HTTP alerts from our monitoring system. I did some research in the apache access_logs and see a behavior that I don't understand. I pulled some data this morning in hopes that you could help me understand what is happening here and how to potentially correct it.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_perl issue

On Jan 21, 2007, at 11:39 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 21.01.07 14:35, Israel Brewster wrote: I have a perl script running in apache 1.3 which generates a .png image. If i run it normally (using system perl), it works. When I try running it under mod_perl however (increased performanc

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Forbidden web pages

Ok. I got this problem solved (finally). It turns out that there is a mrtg.conf file I had to edit. This file was pointing to the wrong directory. I can now see my mrtg graphs ok...but with one little caveat. Only if I enter localhost/mrtg for the URL. I still can't get it to display from IP_a

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Performance on mod_proxy?

> Hi, Hi Very strange. Looks like your backend server's response is not starting with a HTTP status line[1], like: HTTP/1.x 200 OK [1]http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html Even if proxy instance is making an bad request (due a bug or something, which I don't think so), the bac

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_ssl

On Jan 22, 2007, at 8:21 AM, John Flores wrote: I am looking for instrunctions on how to disable mod_ssl for 1.3 and 2.0. Comment out the LoadModule line in httpd.conf and restart your server. Alternatively, many server installations wrap the SSL configuration in an block. To turn of mo

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_ssl

I am looking for instrunctions on how to disable mod_ssl for 1.3 and 2.0. Thanks, John Flores

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Performance on mod_proxy?

Hi, Do you have any idea what these error lines in the error log means? (Apache 2.24 under Linux) in the error log of the reverse proxy (mod_proxy): [Mon Jan 22 14:11:26 2007] [error] [client 82.208.146.70] proxy: error reading status line from remote server localhost, referer: http://www.s

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_proxy _balancer and weblogic 8.1

Hi all, We plan to use mod_proxy_balancer in our environment...our backend server is weblogic 8.1 sp2. we currently using apache 2.2 and weblogic. weblogic 8.1 is not having plugin for apache 2.2 therefore we plan to go for mod_proxy Please let me session stickiness will wor

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Issues installing PHP

On Jan 22, 2007, at 7:08 AM, Nick Kew wrote: On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 00:24:19 -0500 (EST) "Bashiro"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: LoadModule php5_module "P/php/php5apache2.dll" AddType application/x-httpd-php .php Please don't propagate that myth. It's an ugly hack that may have been requ

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] VIRTUAL HOSTS

On 01/22/2007 03:59 PM, Bashiro wrote: What do you want to happen if someone requests https://domain2.myhost.com/ ? I would like it to serve the ordinary main server. Well... it does, the problem is that the 'ordinary main server' for HTTPS isn't the one for http. What you could do is to add

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Issues installing PHP

On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 00:24:19 -0500 (EST) "Bashiro"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > LoadModule php5_module "P/php/php5apache2.dll" > AddType application/x-httpd-php .php Please don't propagate that myth. It's an ugly hack that may have been required in the very early days, but got fixed in 199

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mounted file system for DocumentRoot

Hi Jim, The only kind of filesystem anyone would ever use for a DocumentRoot was one which was mounted. By "mounted", do you mean that it's NFS? Samba? Automount of one of these? Also, none of us can really tell you any specifics without details of what your problem is. What kind of erro

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] VIRTUAL HOSTS

Thanks guys. When you asked the question; What do you want to happen if someone requests https://domain2.myhost.com/ ? I would like it to serve the ordinary main server. And this makes logic. I only have to declare the document root isn't it ? Thanks a lot Bashiro --- On Mon 01/22, Boyle O

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Performance on mod_proxy?

> Hi, Hi: > I am not sure how good Apache mod_proxy on its > Load-Balance and Failover, in regarding its > Performance, Capacity Limit, Security, etc? Can > someone help me? > > Thx, Q.Xie As 2.2 mod_proxy is production stable, it's surely reliable. I'm testing and it's almost OK. The uniq

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Uninstalling Apache2

On linux platform. If you used the "official" Apache package from your distribution (or an update of this package), you can simply uninstall it with your package manager (e.g. rpm -e PACKAGE or apt-get remove PACKAGE). If you compiled Apache from source, however, you need to delete it manual

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Uninstalling Apache2

On linux platform. -Venkat On 1/22/07, Gayal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In which platform are you running Apache? On 1/22/07, raj gopal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi All, > > I am fed up with Apache2 installation. I need to start from scratch. > > Can any one help me to uninstall Apache

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Uninstalling Apache2

In which platform are you running Apache? On 1/22/07, raj gopal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi All, I am fed up with Apache2 installation. I need to start from scratch. Can any one help me to uninstall Apache2 completely? -Venkat -- Gayal Rupasinghe SU-APIIT "The willingness to make a c

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Uninstalling Apache2

I am fed up with Apache2 installation. I need to start from scratch. Can any one help me to uninstall Apache2 completely? On which platform? Best, Sascha - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Pro

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Uninstalling Apache2

Hi All, I am fed up with Apache2 installation. I need to start from scratch. Can any one help me to uninstall Apache2 completely? -Venkat

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http authentication via a secure LDAP server

I am running Apache 2.0.55 with mod_perl 2.0.1 and Perl 5.8.1 on a Sun Solaris machine. We would like to do http authentication via our ldap server which is installed with SSL. Are there perl modules that have to be installed or must I recompile apache and mod_perl with specific options? Can anyo

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] VIRTUAL HOSTS

On 01/22/2007 11:56 AM, Boyle Owen wrote: It is not required. If you don't do this, default requests (eg, with just the IP address and no hostname like http://192.168.1.1/) will be served by the "main" config. Hummm... that doesn't work in _my_ configuration, the IP address is served by the fi

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache named virtual host

You mean I should add the DocumentRoot attribute to each VirtualHost? Something like this: code: NameVirtualHost *:80 ServerName linux.domain.com DocumentRoot /var/www/h

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] VIRTUAL HOSTS

On 01/22/2007 11:28 AM, Bashiro wrote: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/vhosts/name-based.html ,Main host goes away: Does this mean whenever one configure any virtual host regardless of wheter it's https or http, the main server delcared in the httpd.conf has to be removed and place in the virtua

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] VIRTUAL HOSTS

> -Original Message- > From: Bashiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 11:29 AM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] VIRTUAL HOSTS > > > > > Hello Folks, > > I appologise for any stupid question. > I only want to understand apache better.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] VIRTUAL HOSTS

Hello Folks, I appologise for any stupid question. I only want to understand apache better. Accordding to http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/vhosts/name-based.html ,Main host goes away: Does this mean whenever one configure any virtual host regardless of wheter it's https or http, the main server

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_perl issue

On 21.01.07 14:35, Israel Brewster wrote: > I have a perl script running in apache 1.3 which generates a .png > image. If i run it normally (using system perl), it works. When I try > running it under mod_perl however (increased performance, works under > chrooting), the first line of the png

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache named virtual host

Well, as you've documented the content of your httpd.conf, you are not setting different documentroot values in the other virtual hosts! On 21/01/07, Alessandro Ilardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi there, I can't run any virtual host except for the default. code: -