[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_access => mod_authz_host change

2006-12-14 Thread Bill Moseley
I have a httpd.conf file that runs on multiple machines -- where a different collection of modules are compiled in. So, I use to test if the module is loaded, and load if if needed. But, now I have one machine running 2.0.54 and another 2.2 so on one machine I need mod_access and the other mod_

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ap_get_scoreboard_lb failed

2006-12-14 Thread Serge Dubrouski
Hello - What could be the reason for the following error messages in the error log file: [error] proxy: ap_get_scoreboard_lb(4) failed in child 18765 for worker Platform is Solaris 8, Apache 2.2.3 some ProxyPass and ProxyPassReverse configured.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Enabling huge uploads

2006-12-14 Thread Curby
On 12/14/06, Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, December 14, 2006 2:37 am, Curby wrote: > I'm having trouble accepting large file uploads in Apache 2.0.46 > (RHEL3). I've set > > LimitRequestBody 1074790400 I *think* Apache also has a separate Limit on the POST size... Search for

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Templated config for vhost

2006-12-14 Thread Florian Lindner
Am Donnerstag, 14. Dezember 2006 19:22 schrieb Joshua Slive: > On 12/13/06, Florian Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > is is possible to define a template for a vhost config entry and use this > > template in other entries. > > For example I have the template: > > > > > > Se

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changing DocumentRoot Doesn't Work

2006-12-14 Thread Norman Peelman
>- Original Message - >From: Yvo van Doorn >To: users@httpd.apache.org >Sent: Saturday, December 09, 2006 12:34 PM >Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changing DocumentRoot Doesn't Work > > >Just for my sake, couldn't a '-f /path/to/file' have avoided this problem? > > >On 12/7/06, Norman Pe

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ErrorDocument 401

2006-12-14 Thread Liz Kim
It does not redirect or give me a 401 error. It stays on the same page.. On 12/14/06, Steve Swift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In what way does safari not work fine? In other words, what are the symptoms? On 13/12/06, Liz Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > I have a 401 error on a directory redi

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Processes not yielding, and lockf

2006-12-14 Thread Richard Lynch
On Wed, December 13, 2006 10:43 pm, Kevin Jones wrote: > What do lockf and sbwait mean? Are the processes just idling? This answer falls more under the realm of Voodoo than Debugging, but it's possible that the lockf processes are waiting on PHP to finish its locked session storage. It's very ver

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Enabling huge uploads

2006-12-14 Thread Richard Lynch
On Thu, December 14, 2006 2:37 am, Curby wrote: > I'm having trouble accepting large file uploads in Apache 2.0.46 > (RHEL3). I've set > > LimitRequestBody 1074790400 I *think* Apache also has a separate Limit on the POST size... Search for that in your httpd.conf and http://apache.org directive

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] loadbalancing with Apache - Sticky Sessions

2006-12-14 Thread Richard Lynch
On Thu, December 14, 2006 10:16 am, Richard de Vries wrote: > I'm experiencing some problems with our loadbalancer > infrastructure over our Apache webservers and I've > been asked to set some sort of Session ID either in > the environment variables, or as part of the URL. > > Something the loadbal

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPM prefork

2006-12-14 Thread Grant
> I use mod_perl and I can't use a threaded perl. Does that mean I > can't use a threaded apache2? I don't know, but I suspect your analysis is correct. mod_php also has issues with thread safety that makes MPM in anything other than pre-fork problematic. Actually, PHP core is probably fairly

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Templated config for vhost

2006-12-14 Thread Joshua Slive
On 12/13/06, Florian Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, is is possible to define a template for a vhost config entry and use this template in other entries. For example I have the template: ServerName $SERVER_NAME ServerAlias *.$SERVER_NAME $MORE_ALIASES DocumentR

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPM prefork

2006-12-14 Thread Richard Lynch
On Thu, December 14, 2006 11:09 am, Grant wrote: > I use mod_perl and I can't use a threaded perl. Does that mean I > can't use a threaded apache2? I don't know, but I suspect your analysis is correct. mod_php also has issues with thread safety that makes MPM in anything other than pre-fork prob

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] do not proxy static files

2006-12-14 Thread Joshua Slive
On 12/13/06, Xavier Noria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am using mod_proxy_balancer to balance Mongrels in localhost. I am putting lines like ProxyPass /images/ ! to let Apache serve static files, but that couples the config with the application layout. I would prefer to be able to simply say

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RewriteRule oddity

2006-12-14 Thread Richard Lynch
On Tue, December 12, 2006 1:22 am, Boyle Owen wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Richard Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 2:32 AM >> To: users@httpd.apache.org >> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RewriteRule oddity >> >> I have a RewriteRule that works on all

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPM prefork

2006-12-14 Thread Grant
> Does this mean apache-1.3 preforked by default? If so, why was this > behavior changed for apache2? Why wouldn't I want to run MPM prefork? Yes, 1.3 is a pre-forking webserver. For a description of why you might want to change this, see http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mpm.html and the docs

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error --with-dbm=gdbm, version 2.0.59

2006-12-14 Thread K. Clair
On 12/14/06, Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 10:04:01AM -0600, K. Clair wrote: > I don't think it has anything to do with the installed libraries: > httpd-2.0.55 with the same configure options compiles with no errors > on the same machine. > > I also tried to compile

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPM prefork

2006-12-14 Thread Joshua Slive
On 12/14/06, Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Does this mean apache-1.3 preforked by default? If so, why was this behavior changed for apache2? Why wouldn't I want to run MPM prefork? Yes, 1.3 is a pre-forking webserver. For a description of why you might want to change this, see http://htt

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] loadbalancing with Apache - Sticky Sessions

2006-12-14 Thread Richard de Vries
Thanks for the info ... I am definately going to look into this. From a quick glance I did learn that this is trictly cookie based. Do you know of anything that can generate a SID and attach it to the URL? --- Sander Temme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 14, 2006, at 8:16 AM, Richard de V

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache start segmentation fault: EMLINK (Too many links)

2006-12-14 Thread alex handle
On 12/14/06, Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 11:36:35AM +0100, alex handle wrote: > Hi! > > Yesterday i migrated an old webserver (Apache 1.3.34, FreeBSD 5.2.1) to > Apache 2.2.3 and FreeBSD 6.1. > > The configuration consists of 776 vhost. > After importing the vhos

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] loadbalancing with Apache - Sticky Sessions

2006-12-14 Thread Sander Temme
On Dec 14, 2006, at 8:16 AM, Richard de Vries wrote: Does anyone have any good recommendations / suggestions? Would mod_usertrack do the trick? http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_usertrack.html S. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.temme.net/sander/ PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC

[EMAIL PROTECTED] MPM prefork

2006-12-14 Thread Grant
Hello, I've started using the MPM prefork with apache2 along with these settings: StartServers5 MinSpareServers 5 MaxSpareServers 20 MaxClients 150 MaxRequestsPerChild 100 I'm happy with the results, but I'm curious about the following quote taken fro

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error --with-dbm=gdbm, version 2.0.59

2006-12-14 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 10:04:01AM -0600, K. Clair wrote: > I don't think it has anything to do with the installed libraries: > httpd-2.0.55 with the same configure options compiles with no errors > on the same machine. > > I also tried to compile httpd-2.0.57, and I got the same make error as > w

[EMAIL PROTECTED] loadbalancing with Apache - Sticky Sessions

2006-12-14 Thread Richard de Vries
I'm experiencing some problems with our loadbalancer infrastructure over our Apache webservers and I've been asked to set some sort of Session ID either in the environment variables, or as part of the URL. Something the loadbalancers can use to determine session information. I was thinking of mo

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error --with-dbm=gdbm, version 2.0.59

2006-12-14 Thread K. Clair
I don't think it has anything to do with the installed libraries: httpd-2.0.55 with the same configure options compiles with no errors on the same machine. I also tried to compile httpd-2.0.57, and I got the same make error as with 2.0.59. Again, all of this was done on the same system. Has any

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem using apache as a reverse proxy for https

2006-12-14 Thread Joshua Slive
On 12/14/06, frank rittinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks for the answer, As far as I understand it, this would mean that the client talks to my proxy with one certificate and then the proxy decrypts and encrypts the request and uses the original servers certificate to communicate with th

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem using apache as a reverse proxy for https

2006-12-14 Thread frank rittinger
Thanks for the answer, As far as I understand it, this would mean that the client talks to my proxy with one certificate and then the proxy decrypts and encrypts the request and uses the original servers certificate to communicate with the original server, i.e. Client - cert A ---> Proxy -

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] re-writing URI's

2006-12-14 Thread Joshua Slive
On 12/14/06, Foster, Stephen (ASPIRE) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi there, i'm having a bit of trouble getting a rewrite rule for a URI to work. Basically i have the following scenario, The user enters http://www.domain.com and this gets intercepted by another API and the browser gets a URL se

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache Server Problem

2006-12-14 Thread Joshua Slive
On 12/14/06, Andy Rush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I'm new to this forum so please bear with me We're running Apache 2.0.52 on an IBM iSeries 520 Who provided you with Apache? It appears to be modified and is certainly out-of-date, so you may have better luck contacting your supplier.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem using apache as a reverse proxy for https

2006-12-14 Thread Joshua Slive
On 12/14/06, frank rittinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello list, I'm trying to get apache2 working as a reverse proxy. Regular HTTP requests just work fine, but I can't get it working for HTTPS requests. On startup of apache, I get the following error in the logs: You configured HTTP(80) on

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Processes not yielding, and lockf

2006-12-14 Thread Joshua Slive
On 12/13/06, Kevin Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm running an Apache server on a FreeBSD server with 494 MB of RAM and an Intel Celeron 2.4 GHz CPU. A recent surge of traffic to my PHP site has been causing the server to come to its knees. The first symptom is that the server won't return m

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Simple Rewrite Question

2006-12-14 Thread Huesser Peter
OK. Thanks a lot. This works fine. Pedro - Seems that you are redirecting to yourself: You need a (virtual)host for servername, in this you redirect to servername.mydomain The (virtual)host servername.mydomain then has the correc

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Simple Rewrite Question

2006-12-14 Thread Roman Fiedler
Seems that you are redirecting to yourself: You need a (virtual)host for servername, in this you redirect to servername.mydomain The (virtual)host servername.mydomain then has the correct SSL certificate and so on but does not redirect to somewhere else. Does not work. I get an error mess

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Simple Rewrite Question

2006-12-14 Thread Huesser Peter
Does not work. I get an error message "Redirection limit for this URL exceeded. ...". By the way: the reason I have to do is is the certificate which was created for "servername.mydomain". So everybody who just types "servername" has to accept the certificate. I want to avoid this. Pedro ---

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_auth_ldap

2006-12-14 Thread John P. Dodge
You can specify options in the OpenLDAP configure to only build the libs and includes. configure --disable-slapd --disable-slurpd On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Malka Cymbalista wrote: > I am running Apache 2.0.55 with mod_perl 2.0.1 and Perl 5.8.1 on a Sun > Solaris machine. We would like to do http aut

[EMAIL PROTECTED] pipe form output as arguments to cgi program(?)

2006-12-14 Thread michaeljay
Thank you, Sean. Surprised not more laughter. But supposedly pre-standardization it was possible to pipe the data that way. So let me rephrase: can we configure (for no particular immediate purpose) Apache to receive input as command line arguments, whether as one cell of the 2D array or pre-

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Simple Rewrite Question

2006-12-14 Thread Roman Fiedler
Huesser Peter wrote: Hello Within a virtual server I want every request of the form https://servername to be redirected to https://servername.mydomain . Can somebody give me a hint which RewriteRule and RewriteCond I have to use? Thanks’

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Simple Rewrite Question

2006-12-14 Thread Huesser Peter
Hello Within a virtual server I want every request of the form https://servername to be redirected to https://servername.mydomain . Can somebody give me a hint which RewriteRule and RewriteCond I have to use? Thanks' in advance for any

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache start segmentation fault: EMLINK (Too many links)

2006-12-14 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 11:36:35AM +0100, alex handle wrote: > Hi! > > Yesterday i migrated an old webserver (Apache 1.3.34, FreeBSD 5.2.1) to > Apache 2.2.3 and FreeBSD 6.1. > > The configuration consists of 776 vhost. > After importing the vhosts.conf file i did a "apachectl configtest" and it

[EMAIL PROTECTED] re-writing URI's

2006-12-14 Thread Foster, Stephen \(ASPIRE\)
Hi there, i'm having a bit of trouble getting a rewrite rule for a URI to work. Basically i have the following scenario, The user enters http://www.domain.com and this gets intercepted by another API and the browser gets a URL sent back with a URI added including the original URL of http://www.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache Server Problem

2006-12-14 Thread Andy Rush
Hi, I'm new to this forum so please bear with me We're running Apache 2.0.52 on an IBM iSeries 520On this platform we run a real time web site providing live stock access to customers. The site has been running fine for well over 3 years (programs haven't changed), however recent system softwar

Re(2): [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache & php

2006-12-14 Thread Long
Tried your suggestion with no luck... any other thoughts? Andrew Long (Apologies for quoting from bottom-up, I'm using a web interface that won't allow me to change it) -- Original Message -- From: "Yvo van Doorn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: users@httpd.a

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem using apache as a reverse proxy for https

2006-12-14 Thread frank rittinger
Hello list, I'm trying to get apache2 working as a reverse proxy. Regular HTTP requests just work fine, but I can't get it working for HTTPS requests. On startup of apache, I get the following error in the logs: You configured HTTP(80) on the standard HTTPS(443) port! Although, I just want to

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache start segmentation fault: EMLINK (Too many links)

2006-12-14 Thread alex handle
On 12/14/06, Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -Original Message- > From: alex handle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 11:37 AM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache start segmentation fault: > EMLINK (Too many links) > > Hi!

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache start segmentation fault: EMLINK (Too many links)

2006-12-14 Thread Boyle Owen
> -Original Message- > From: alex handle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 11:37 AM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache start segmentation fault: > EMLINK (Too many links) > > Hi! > > Yesterday i migrated an old webserver (Apache

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apache start segmentation fault: EMLINK (Too many links)

2006-12-14 Thread alex handle
Hi! Yesterday i migrated an old webserver (Apache 1.3.34, FreeBSD 5.2.1) to Apache 2.2.3 and FreeBSD 6.1. The configuration consists of 776 vhost. After importing the vhosts.conf file i did a "apachectl configtest" and it showed no errors. But with "apachectl start" i get an segmentation fault.

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Authentication/Authorization at DocRoot and below

2006-12-14 Thread Boyle Owen
> -Original Message- > From: Saad, Dan (N-Computer Sciences Corp) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 10:08 AM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Authentication/Authorization at > DocRoot and below > > Apache 1.3.37, auth_ldap v1.6.1, on S

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Authentication/Authorization at DocRoot and below

2006-12-14 Thread Saad, Dan (N-Computer Sciences Corp)
Apache 1.3.37, auth_ldap v1.6.1, on Solaris 2.9 I currently authenticate the user at the top of my site. LDAP non_authoritative - mod_auth authoritative so that during authorization I can check membership in a series of groups (ug01-ug05) prior to granting access. Membership in any of the 5 groups

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enabling huge uploads

2006-12-14 Thread Curby
I'm having trouble accepting large file uploads in Apache 2.0.46 (RHEL3). I've set LimitRequestBody 1074790400 which is 1025 MB in my virtual host, and (in case it matters) PHP is set up thus: max_input_time = 120 memory_limit = 8M post_max_size = 999M file_uploads = On upload_tmp_dir = /var/t

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ErrorDocument 401

2006-12-14 Thread Steve Swift
In what way does safari not work fine? In other words, what are the symptoms? On 13/12/06, Liz Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have a 401 error on a directory redirect to a local file... It seems to work fine on most browsers I've tested so far EXCEPT safari... Anyone else have this problem?