RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] FastCgi and Rewrite

2006-12-12 Thread Boyle Owen
> -Original Message- > From: dave . [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 7:08 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] FastCgi and Rewrite > > Hi Owen, > I may have been too impatient. I was moving to a new server > and before the > DNS

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ssl - force ssl per directory

2006-12-12 Thread Steve Swift
You are specifying a file in your redirect. My documentation states: Syntax: Redirect [status] URL-path URL The old URL-path is a (%-decoded) path beginning with a slash. A relative path is not allowed. On 12/12/06, Nathan Kellogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We have open ssl running fine on Apa

[EMAIL PROTECTED] make error --with-dbm=gdbm, version 2.0.59

2006-12-12 Thread K. Clair
Hi, I'm trying to upgrade apache from 2.0.55 to 2.0.59. We have a standard configure line that we have been using for the entire 2.0.x release of apache: ./configure --enable-maintainer-mode --enable-proxy --disable-proxy-connect --disable-proxy-ftp --enable-mods-shared=all --with-dbm=gdbm --wi

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ssl - force ssl per directory

2006-12-12 Thread Nathan Kellogg
We have open ssl running fine on Apache 2.2.3. A separate virtual host is defined for both the :80 port and for :443 In order that the .../secure/... directory be handled exclusively by the SSL host, we have : in the :80 vhost : Redirect permanent c:/orcourt/htdocs/secure https://www.orcour

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: What version of apache from httpd.conf ?

2006-12-12 Thread Robert T Wyatt
MacOSX includes 1.3.33, unless you already went through the upgrade procedure before, that was the version you were running. Also, httpd -V will tell you a little bit more about your configuration (in addition to the version number). ---

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] What version of apache from httpd.conf ?

2006-12-12 Thread Tom Cooper
I'm in a similar situation. If you have httpd on your os X box still, you should be able to run httpd -v and it will tell you the version. I've been poking around on this for a few days, and the best thing I can figure is that: a) if (old) Apache 2.0.52 is adequate for you, Server Logistics h

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] FastCgi and Rewrite

2006-12-12 Thread dave .
Hi Owen, I may have been too impatient. I was moving to a new server and before the DNS was complete this url did not work http://216.246.77.168/~dkennedy/rails/ this url is working http://www.dksy.net/rails/ Since there is a lot to learn about FastCgi and Rewrite is there a way to confirm (lo

[EMAIL PROTECTED] What version of apache from httpd.conf ?

2006-12-12 Thread Evan Platt
Ok, so long story short.. Had Apache go belly up on my os/x box. I got an error about missing ssl/httpd.conf , and tried reinstalling what I thought was the version I had prior, not knowing the problem was due to a ssl software. So reinstalled openssl, and now when I try to run apache, I get:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: [SOLVED] wrong content-type for favicon.ico

2006-12-12 Thread Xavier Noria
On Dec 12, 2006, at 4:43 PM, Xavier Noria wrote: I have a 2.2.3 compiled by hand in a Debian. The main conf is untouched except for an Include at the end and a LoadModule flvx_modulemodules/mod_flvx.so. The include at the end loads a config file for a very simple vhost, who has noth

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] show details of the archives of the directory

2006-12-12 Thread Joshua Slive
On 12/12/06, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 12/12/06, Bruno Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi all, > > In Apache 2,2 when I list a directory, different of Apache 2,0 it is not > shown details of the archives of the directory. Which option I have that > to place to show details

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 monitor

2006-12-12 Thread Yvo van Doorn
I use Zabbix (http://www.zabbix.com) on all my production machines. Hardly any over head and it does a fantastic job (my opinion) of monitoring. It doesn't restore when done (but could) because of the very reasons others have said. If Apache goes down, something is probably not right on the machi

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrong content-type for favicon.ico

2006-12-12 Thread Xavier Noria
I have a 2.2.3 compiled by hand in a Debian. The main conf is untouched except for an Include at the end and a LoadModule flvx_modulemodules/mod_flvx.so. The include at the end loads a config file for a very simple vhost, who has nothing particular about mime types. The thing is,

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] show details of the archives of the directory

2006-12-12 Thread Joshua Slive
On 12/12/06, Bruno Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hi all, In Apache 2,2 when I list a directory, different of Apache 2,0 it is not shown details of the archives of the directory. Which option I have that to place to show details of this archive? I don't know what you mean by "archives of

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NameVirtualHost screw-up

2006-12-12 Thread POLONKAI Gergely
Sorry, you are right. I ran through the other questions. However, after giving a name to the default namevhost, (ServerName dummy, as you suggested), it started to work. Thank you for the responses! Regards, Gergely POLONKAI Boyle Owen írta: >> -Original Message- >> From: POLONKAI Gergel

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NameVirtualHost screw-up

2006-12-12 Thread Boyle Owen
> -Original Message- > From: POLONKAI Gergely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 11:17 AM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NameVirtualHost screw-up > > No, the files are included at the very end of the > apache2.conf file. This is th

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NameVirtualHost screw-up

2006-12-12 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 12.12.06 10:14, POLONKAI Gergely wrote: > I have some NameVirtualHosts set up on my machine, as told by apache2 -S: > > 192.168.1.1:80 is a NameVirtualHost > default server test.wx (/etc/apache2/sites-enabled/000-default:1) > port 80 namevhost test.wx

[EMAIL PROTECTED] show details of the archives of the directory

2006-12-12 Thread Bruno Oliveira
hi all, In Apache 2,2 when I list a directory, different of Apache 2,0 it is not shown details of the archives of the directory. Which option I have that to place to show details of this archive? thz - The official User-To-User

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NameVirtualHost screw-up

2006-12-12 Thread POLONKAI Gergely
No, the files are included at the very end of the apache2.conf file. This is the debian default. Boyle Owen írta: > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: POLONKAI Gergely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 10:51 AM >> To: users@httpd.apache.org >> Subject: Re:

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NameVirtualHost screw-up

2006-12-12 Thread Boyle Owen
> -Original Message- > From: POLONKAI Gergely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 10:51 AM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NameVirtualHost screw-up > > It is a debian sarge, with apache 2.0.54-sarge1 installed > from a package. >

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NameVirtualHost screw-up

2006-12-12 Thread POLONKAI Gergely
It is a debian sarge, with apache 2.0.54-sarge1 installed from a package. These are from apache2.conf and ports.conf UseCanonicalNames Off Listen 80 NameVirtualHost 192.168.1.1:80 This is my 000-default file: ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] DocumentRoot /var/www/

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NameVirtualHost screw-up

2006-12-12 Thread Boyle Owen
> -Original Message- > From: POLONKAI Gergely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 10:14 AM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NameVirtualHost screw-up > > Hello list, > > I have some NameVirtualHosts set up on my machine, as told by > apac

[EMAIL PROTECTED] NameVirtualHost screw-up

2006-12-12 Thread POLONKAI Gergely
Hello list, I have some NameVirtualHosts set up on my machine, as told by apache2 -S: 192.168.1.1:80 is a NameVirtualHost default server test.wx (/etc/apache2/sites-enabled/000-default:1) port 80 namevhost test.wx (/etc/apache2/sites-enabled/000-default:1) port 80