Since you already using a detached task to run the batch job, if it's not too
much work and the result of the batch job is not a requirement for the
response, can you just pass your variables to the batch job?
Steve Swift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can a CGI script close the session with
the b
> On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 09:43 -0500, Joshua Slive wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 09:18 -0500, Joshua Slive wrote:
> > >
> > > > But what you don't want is an HTTP server.
> > >
> > > True, although http would be suitable if I could reduce the
> > unecessary
> > > bandwidth from the headers.
> >
Can a CGI script close the session with the browser before it exits?
I tried closing STDOUT and STDERR in the hope that Apache might notice, and
clean up the session, but the browser remained waiting.
I have a CGI script that send its page to the browser then has a "batch" job
to do, which takes
Lucuk, Pete schrieb:
The backend server is a 3.x version of Jboss that uses Jetty as the
Servlet engine.
Can you use AJP with Jetty?
If not, is there some simple way to yank out the new lines in
SSL_CLIENT_CERT on the reverse proxy?
I just looked up the Apache Docs, because I remembered those
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 15:40 +0100, Frode E. Moe wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 22:31:48 +0800, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > > Luckily, the 2.x version
> > > has been designed to support multiple protocols. See mod_echo (or
> > > mod_pop3 or mod_ftpd) for an example of how to substitute another
> > >
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 09:43 -0500, Joshua Slive wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 09:18 -0500, Joshua Slive wrote:
> >
> > > But what you don't want is an HTTP server.
> >
> > True, although http would be suitable if I could reduce the
> unecessary
> > bandwidth from the headers.
>
> But the header
People,
I did a few more tests, and the user i enter in the browser when it goes to
Auth, i can see in apache logs:
[Fri Nov 24 00:34:45 2006] [error] [client 192.168.1.1] user oi: authentication
failure for "/": Password Mismatch
But looking at MySQL logs:
061124 0:34:45 218 Connect
On 11/23/06, Filip Kolendo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I notice strange (in my opinion erroneous and dangerous) behaviour of
Apache; very easily can be completely locked by wrong/malicious clients.
I think it can have something common with the situation discussed in the
thread I point belo
Hello,
I notice strange (in my opinion erroneous and dangerous) behaviour of
Apache; very easily can be completely locked by wrong/malicious clients.
I think it can have something common with the situation discussed in the
thread I point below, although I'm not sure whether the reason is the
same.
On Nov 23, 2006, at 11:36 AM, Teresa Dannette McGrew wrote:
I appreciate the help... that answer is 50+% correct... the
apache2.conf
file doesn't tell apache2 what port to listen on, at least not
directly. It
refers it to another file named ports.conf... in that file it says,
listen=80... c
I appreciate the help... that answer is 50+% correct... the apache2.conf
file doesn't tell apache2 what port to listen on, at least not directly. It
refers it to another file named ports.conf... in that file it says,
listen=80... change that to 8080 and I'm set...
Thanks, I wouldn't have known tha
This is router setup -- not apache setup. It is described pretty well in the
router docs, and is the same for most LinkSys routers (in case you lost the
docs to yours they post docs online at linksys.com). Routers have an external
IP address for the WAN -- which you can set, and they have a loca
1) Set the Apache server to have a static IP. If the gateway on the
router is 192.168.1.1 give the server something like 192.168.1.50
2) Have the router DHCP assign IPs in a different range, starting at
192.168.1.100 for other computers on your network
3) Update the IP routing table in the ro
I have Apache2 on a Debian, Sarge computer.
I'm behind a Linksys (WRT54GS)
router. I've installed the packages to enable this
computer (DELL Optiplex GX1)
to be a webserver. I can run through the perfect
debian server setup, but still
have some questions.
How do I make this server's webpages ap
Hi all,
I got a problem while i try to use php with my apache:
httpd: Syntax error on line 65 of /data/programs/apache2/conf/httpd.conf:
Cannot load /data/programs/apache2/modules/libphp5.so into server:
/data/programs/apache2/modules/libphp5.so: undefined symbol: zend_ini_string
I compiled apa
On 11/23/06, Michael Hulet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Isn't it "dangerous" to remove base-config and initrd-tools packages?
I have no idea. Sounds like a question better targeted at a Debian users list.
Joshua.
-
The offic
Joshua Slive a écrit :
> On 11/23/06, Michael Hulet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > But what really concerns me here is that you said you were downloading
>> > and compiling directly from apache.org, yet you are using apache2ctl,
>> > which I believe is debian-specific. This could be causing any
Well...
AuthDBDUserPWQuery "select password from users where username='%s'"
the % in %s for sure that is the username that cames in HTTP AUTH as the
docs describe in:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_authn_dbd.html
So... why isn't apache sending the username, anyone?
Jorge
- Or
Thanks for the reply. If you would please look at the complete request you
would see that I am using AJP to communicate to one host and http to
communicate with the other. The AJP connection is working fine, it's the
http to the IIS6 machine that's problematical.
ProxyRequests Off
ProxyPreserveH
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 14:58 +, Jorge Bastos wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Anyone?
I suggest you post this at mysql@lists.mysql.com This is an Apache
list, not a MySQL one.
But just to give you a hint, "%" is a wildcard character in MySQL. It
is not replaced with the username.
---
On 11/23/06, Michael Hulet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But what really concerns me here is that you said you were downloading
> and compiling directly from apache.org, yet you are using apache2ctl,
> which I believe is debian-specific. This could be causing any number
> of problems, and could
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:05:33 +0100
Michael Hulet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I wanted to remove apache2-utils but it wants to remove a lot of
> dependencies that I don't want to remove (phpMyAdmin, Webmin,
> php, ...). What do you think I should do first?
Does Debian's documentation not help
Joshua Slive a écrit :
> On 11/23/06, Michael Hulet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the tip, Joshua. So here is my new httpd.conf:
>>
>> LoadModule proxy_module modules/mod_proxy.so
>> LoadModule proxy_http_module modules/mod_proxy_http.so
>> LoadModule proxy_balancer_module
Guys,
Anyone?
- Original Message -
From: Jorge Bastos
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 10:24 PM
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem with SQL statment
Hi There People,
I have all setup, compiled the libaprutil with mysql support from svn
yesterday, all w
On 11/23/06, Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 09:18 -0500, Joshua Slive wrote:
> But what you don't want is an HTTP server.
True, although http would be suitable if I could reduce the unecessary
bandwidth from the headers.
But the headers are an inherent part of HTT
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 22:31:48 +0800, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > Luckily, the 2.x version
> > has been designed to support multiple protocols. See mod_echo (or
> > mod_pop3 or mod_ftpd) for an example of how to substitute another
> > protocol module for the http protocol module.
>
> Does that mean
On 11/23/06, Michael Hulet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the tip, Joshua. So here is my new httpd.conf:
LoadModule proxy_module modules/mod_proxy.so
LoadModule proxy_http_module modules/mod_proxy_http.so
LoadModule proxy_balancer_module modules/mod_proxy_balancer.so
The res
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 09:18 -0500, Joshua Slive wrote:
> But what you don't want is an HTTP server.
True, although http would be suitable if I could reduce the unecessary
bandwidth from the headers.
> Luckily, the 2.x version
> has been designed to support multiple protocols. See mod_echo (or
Joshua Slive a écrit :
> On 11/23/06, Michael Hulet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I'm upgrading from Apache 2.0.54 to Apache 2.2.3, as I would like to
>> try the proxy_balancer module.
>>
>> I'm running a Debian Sarge box. I uninstalled Apache 2.0.54 and I
>> compiled and installed
On 11/23/06, Michael Hulet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello all,
I'm upgrading from Apache 2.0.54 to Apache 2.2.3, as I would like to try the
proxy_balancer module.
I'm running a Debian Sarge box. I uninstalled Apache 2.0.54 and I compiled and
installed Apache 2.2.3 in /etc/apache2:
# wg
On 11/23/06, Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 11:32 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> Why do you want to use apache (HTTP server) when you want your application
> send no headers (e.g. no HTTP response)?
Because Apache is robust, efficient, flexible, bulletproof,
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 11:21 +, Nick Kew wrote:
> No headers at all?
I'd like to get rid of as many as I can. But I can't seem to get rid of
any, well, except the ones I create myself.
> You can't do that in response to an HTTP/1.x
> request, because (bugs aside), Apache won't break HTTP a
We use:
...
Header set Server "This is the new header"
...
on apache-2.2.3.
Doesn't work for me, maybe it doesn't work for 2.0.
Thanks
Dan
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See ht
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 11:32 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> Why do you want to use apache (HTTP server) when you want your application
> send no headers (e.g. no HTTP response)?
Because Apache is robust, efficient, flexible, bulletproof, easy to
interface to virtually any database, easy to
Hello all,
I'm upgrading from Apache 2.0.54 to Apache 2.2.3, as I would like to try the
proxy_balancer module.
I'm running a Debian Sarge box. I uninstalled Apache 2.0.54 and I compiled and
installed Apache 2.2.3 in /etc/apache2:
# wget http://apache.scarlet.be/httpd/httpd-2.2.3.tar.gz
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:28:51 +0800
Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm running Apache 2.0 on Debian Sarge.
>
> I have a non-standard application for Apache, and don't want to send
> any headers in the response.
No headers at all? You can't do that in response to an HTTP/1.x
request,
Dan Nelson schrieb:
> I'm running Apache 2.0 on Debian Sarge.
>
> I have a non-standard application for Apache, and don't want to send any
> headers in the response. I thought I'd be able to do so using
> mod_headers.
>
> I can use the 'Header' directive to add my own header, and then append
> t
On 23.11.06 11:28, Dan Nelson wrote:
> I'm running Apache 2.0 on Debian Sarge.
>
> I have a non-standard application for Apache, and don't want to send any
> headers in the response. I thought I'd be able to do so using
> mod_headers.
Why do you want to use apache (HTTP server) when you want you
Exactly, but for a public-facing web site we have no saying in whether
clients use a firewall or not :(
Also, doesn't this mean that someone could effectively take down the
entire server by opening (MaxWorkers) requests every 5 minutes
and then just not respond to / read the response at all?
Wo
Hi,
seems to be just a firewalling/networking problem. The httpd cannot
operate on the protocol stack level since it does not have the right
privileges. It could be that your client closes the socket (FIN-ACK),
but the the firewall blocks further TCP-packets from the server to your
local prot
Your guess is absolutely correct! I am running Linux Slackware 10.2.
Where could I get hold of a copy of "openssl-dev package" and the "SSL
library" please? Could I find them on the www.openssl.org website?
You mentioned "Ubuntu". Do you mean www.ubuntu.com?
Also if I want to implement dig
Your guess is absolutely correct! I am running Linux Slackware 10.2.
Where could I get hold of a copy of "openssl-dev package" and the "SSL
library" please? Could I find them on the www.openssl.org website?
You mentioned "Ubuntu". Do you mean www.ubuntu.com?
Also if I want to implement dig
Hi again, sorry for the late reply.
I just tried disabling KeepAlive, but it did not help much.
I'm still experiencing windows/firefox clients sending FIN+ACK to close
connection mid-download if it receives Content-Type: text/html when it
expects and Accept: image/png;*. This is followed by the
Yes. We have openSSL installed.
First we installed openSSL and all went well.
Then we tried to install Apache and it was during installing Apache that's
when we got that error message saying that it cannot find the Toolkit.
Richard de Vries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you have o
Yes. We have openSSL installed.
It was during installing Apache that's when we got that error message saying
that it cannot find the Toolkit.
Richard de Vries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you have openSSL installed?
___
> -Original Message-
> From: arun kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 9:26 AM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.x modules
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> Any difference is there in handling(Configuring) the
> below modules between ap
Hi Guys,
Any difference is there in handling(Configuring) the
below modules between apache 1.3.x and apache 2.2.x
- server side includes
- mod_cgi
- mod_setenvif
- mod_rewrite
Arun
--- Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Fenlason, Josh [mailto:[EMAIL P
47 matches
Mail list logo
