Hi,I am running the test suite for apache 2.0.55 on rhel4 and I am not able to figure out why the following test is failing:# testing : GET /modules/include/exec/on/cmd.shtml# expected: pass# received:
not ok 15Can any one help me in debugging out why is this test failing?
Hi,
I have apache 1.3.37 compiled from code and installed on linux.
I also have a DSO loaded for authentication and authorization functions.
I have a folder structure like below
in my htdocs
/protected/
-à index.html
When I try to acc
Hey all;
I have some questions about mod_deflate;
Specifically, in my 8 years of using apache, I had never heard of it
until a few weeks ago. Google shows plenty of howto implement and man
page sites, but few 'mod_deflate is soo good it saved my marriage' type
of testimonia
Jignesh Badani wrote:
> Thanks Nick, it makes sense. So can I assume that the Apache group is fine
> with its user base using 3rd party mod_security
Why not? http://modules.apache.org/ - lots of modules - we have no problem
with users deploying any module which solves their requirements.
> and
On 8/22/06, Lothar Krenzien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Joshua,
thanks for the hint with the loglevel. Now here's my httpd.conf :
ProxyRequests off
ProxyPass /sunreader/ http://localhost:8080/sunreader/
ProxyHTMLURLMap http://localhost:8080/sunreader/ /sunreader
ProxyHTMLLogVerbose On
LogLev
On 8/22/06, Jignesh Badani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Nick, it makes sense. So can I assume that the Apache group is fine
with its user base using 3rd party mod_security and that they do not plan
to develop something similar ?
The reason I am confused is I see Ryan Barnett as Team Lead fo
For the archives:
On 8/22/06, Dmitri Colebatch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It could of course be a bug in mod_wl.
Turns out this was a bug in mod_wl - I've upgraded to the newer
version and its fixed there (8.1 SP5 was the fixed version
apparently).
cheers
dim
---
Title: Smart Card authentication with apache
Hello everyone and thank you for at least perusing my question
I have a Fedora 5 server that is running Apache 2.2.2-1.2 and mod_ssl 2.2.2-1.2. Before I tear up apache again with friends recommendations, I would like to find out if anyone has set
Thanks Nick, it makes sense. So can I assume that the Apache group is fine
with its user base using 3rd party mod_security and that they do not plan
to develop something similar ?
The reason I am confused is I see Ryan Barnett as Team Lead for "Internet
Security Apache Benchmark Project" and he
Looking at http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/core.html#locationmatch
and using its example, is it possible to proxy depending on which of the
paths are used?
e.g.
Given
I wish to proxy using mod_proxy to either http://host/extra/data or
http://host/special/data - depending on which of the path
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 23:22, Jignesh Badani wrote:
> We have been looking at implementing mod_security for quite some time now,
> but it is not getting a green flag because the module is not part of the
> Apache group offering (yet).
>
> 1. Is there a reason, this module is still not being bund
I'm new to this list and sorry that my first post is quite so gritty.
But Hi anyway and Sorry for the long post.
I have a FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE (GENERIC) Server running Apache 2.0.59.
I'm getting regular segmentation faults (several a minute) on this server.
Logs say:
pid 563 (httpd), uid 1004:
On 8/23/06, Anthony Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I basically want a way to provide some control/security over all the
sites without have the sites modified.
Have you looked at http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/howto/auth.html?
Sounds to me like that's what you're after.
cheers
dim
We have been looking at implementing mod_security for quite some time now,
but it is not getting a green flag because the module is not part of the
Apache group offering (yet).
1. Is there a reason, this module is still not being bundled as part of
the Apache source ?
2. Has anybody implement
Hello, I have the following restriction in place:
SetEnvIf X-FORWARDED-FOR ^10.161 let_10161_in
SetEnvIf COOKIE ^XSESSION let_xuser_in
Order Deny,Allow
Deny from all
Allow from env=let_10161_in
Allow from env=let_xuser_in
It basically means users whose X-FORWARDED-FOR contains 10.161 gets in.
On 8/22/06, Anthony Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I will take a look at mod_rewrite.
As far as alpha. Let's say that someone enters the alpha site passing
parameters through the URL, a post, or even just header variables. I
want the ability to have the filter look at any of those different wa
I will take a look at mod_rewrite.
As far as alpha. Let's say that someone enters the alpha site passing
parameters through the URL, a post, or even just header variables. I
want the ability to have the filter look at any of those different ways
and get the value of the variable.
So let's say th
On 8/22/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
We have a shared hosting platform, and have a requirement to allow php
scripts to create directories+files - Problem is that php is run under
apache user (www-data), and the users directories are owned by the
user, so php script is get
On 8/22/06, Anthony Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I know that if I was doing this in java I would need a filter, but if my
sites under apache just includes pictures and html docs, with some cgi, I am
unsure if a filter is really what I need.
I was trying to figure out a way, where based on
Hi,
We have a shared hosting platform, and have a requirement to allow php
scripts to create directories+files - Problem is that php is run under
apache user (www-data), and the users directories are owned by the
user, so php script is getting permission denied...We could chmod 777
on the dir
I know that if I was doing this in java I would need a
filter, but if my sites under apache just includes pictures and html docs, with
some cgi, I am unsure if a filter is really what I need.
I was trying to figure out a way, where based on the URL
path could do certain things.
Hi,
Ah! I was missing the slash at the end of the ProxyPass statement --
my dumb mistake, sorry for wasting your time ;) Thanks for your help
everyone,
Yoav
On 8/22/06, John Madden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 15:52 -0400, Yoav Shapira wrote:
> John,
> Thank you for the su
John,
Thank you for the suggestion, but it doesn't seem to help. I've added
a slash to the line as you suggested,
to no effect: same error message. I also tried adding a
ProxyPassReverse statement to match the ProxyPass one, also to no
effect: same error message.
Thank you,
Yoav
On 8/22/06,
Richard de Vries wrote:
> Have a look at http://www.sunfreeware.com
And if you want to build... read the big red notes about gcc and
syncing system headers ;-)
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server P
Hi,
Thanks for the suggestion.
There is one line in error_log for each request, like this:
[Tue Aug 22 15:04:55 2006] [warn] proxy: No protocol handler was valid
for the URL /test.html. If you are using a DSO version of mod_proxy,
make sure the proxy submodules are included in the configuration
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 13:30:48 -0500, "William A. Rowe, Jr."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Joshua Slive wrote:
>> On 8/22/06, Bo Berglund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I have a published website with several protected directories using
>>> various .htaccess/.htpasswd files. It has been working fine f
Have a look at http://www.sunfreeware.com
-R
--- Shawn Beard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are trying to install Apache 2.0.58 on Solaris
> 10. After recieving
> the following warnings, we try to do the make but
> that errors out.
> Also, I tried finding it but does anyone know if
> ther
We are trying to install Apache 2.0.58 on Solaris 10. After recieving
the following warnings, we try to do the make but that errors out.
Also, I tried finding it but does anyone know if there is a solaris 10
binary version available? Thanks.
configure: WARNING: pthread.h: present but cannot be
Joshua Slive wrote:
> On 8/22/06, Bo Berglund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have a published website with several protected directories using
>> various .htaccess/.htpasswd files. It has been working fine for about
>> 10 years. The server is on a commercial webhost using Apache on Unix.
>>
>> I k
I don't know what to say, then. As soon as I turned it on the commit
I've been trying to complete for 2 days worked. And then I did
another one. I guess I'll have to see how it holds up over time. For
now, at least, I'm the only one accessing this server. I'll be
opening it up to my other dev
On 8/22/06, Bo Berglund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a published website with several protected directories using
various .htaccess/.htpasswd files. It has been working fine for about
10 years. The server is on a commercial webhost using Apache on Unix.
I keep a mirror of the official websi
I have a published website with several protected directories using
various .htaccess/.htpasswd files. It has been working fine for about
10 years. The server is on a commercial webhost using Apache on Unix.
I keep a mirror of the official website locally on a Windows 2003 PC
and all works well ex
On 8/22/06, Rob Wilkerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, I found the problem, Joshua, and I'm hoping you (or someone) can
help me understand it a little better. I dug through my httpd.conf
file and saw that the KeepAlive directive was set to Off so I turned
it on.
That seems quite logical, bu
Well, I found the problem, Joshua, and I'm hoping you (or someone) can
help me understand it a little better. I dug through my httpd.conf
file and saw that the KeepAlive directive was set to Off so I turned
it on.
That seems quite logical, but I'd like to understand it better in a
practical exam
> Show us exactly what your best guess (based on the documentation) for
> the correct config is, and exactly what happens when you try it.
>
> Joshua.
>
Hi Joshua,
thanks for the hint with the loglevel. Now here's my httpd.conf :
ProxyRequests off
ProxyPass /sunreader/ http://localhost:8080/s
Apache 2.0.55
(world_internet) ---https---> (reverseproxy) ---http--->
(lotus_notes_web_access)
When all systems works in http all systems works well.
When I change http to https from internet (certyficate, and turn on ssl) I
have strange problems. I can login, I can read emails, I can send ema
On 8/22/06, Lothar Krenzien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Start by using the RewriteLog so you can see exactly what is in the
> variables you are using.
>
> Joshua.
>
That's what I did all the time. And because I can't find out the problem I
tried to ask here. So now I see the following in the
>
> Start by using the RewriteLog so you can see exactly what is in the
> variables you are using.
>
> Joshua.
>
That's what I did all the time. And because I can't find out the problem I
tried to ask here. So now I see the following in the rewrite.log :
pass through /con
pass through /error/
On 8/22/06, Lothar Krenzien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi there,
I'm using Apache 2.2 from the xampp project on Windows XP and 2003. Now I want
to redirect a request *ONLY* if the URL does not exist. I know the !-U flag for
a RewriteCond but can't get it working. Here's what I tried to do :
* Evaldas Imbrasas wrote:
> Is there a way to return a custom document along with a 503 Network
> Unavailable response code using mod_rewrite rules? The documentation
> mentions the ability to return 3xx and 4xx, but not 5xx. If 5xx codes
> are unavailable - is there a specific reason why?
>
> In
On 8/22/06, Evaldas Imbrasas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
Is there a way to return a custom document along with a 503 Network
Unavailable response code using mod_rewrite rules? The documentation
mentions the ability to return 3xx and 4xx, but not 5xx. If 5xx codes
are unavailable - is ther
Hi there,
I'm using Apache 2.2 from the xampp project on Windows XP and 2003. Now I want
to redirect a request *ONLY* if the URL does not exist. I know the !-U flag for
a RewriteCond but can't get it working. Here's what I tried to do :
RewriteEngine On
...
RewriteCond%{REQUEST_URI} !-U
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 11:07:53AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello Ryszard,
>
> sorry for the stupid question.
> Is tomcat up and listening on localhost:8109 with AJP?
Of course, although it doesn't matter, I cannot see any packet on
interface lo and port 8109, apache does not send anythin
On 8/22/06, Alexander Lazic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Unfortunately 2.2 isn't supported by mod_wl although I've been starting
>to wonder what it is I'm getting out of mod_wl rather than using
>mod_proxy. Any other mod_wl users out there have thoughts on this?
Yep but not yet testet :-(
What
On Die 22.08.2006 13:27, Dmitri Colebatch wrote:
On 8/22/06, Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Smells of bug (unless of course it's confusion on your end). But
2.0.46 is very old. Have you tried a more recent version (preferably
2.2 , where there are quite a few proxy changes)?
Unfortunat
Thank you very much for your help :)
Richard de Vries escribió:
WebLogic doesn't support Apache 2.2, and Apache 2.2 is
not necesarrily downwards compatible with Apache
2.0.x.
I recommend you downgrade to Apache 2.0.59 and stay on
a supported platform.
R
--- Maria Elena Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTE
Do you have a NameVirtualHost directive? If so, what does it contain?Also, it is usual to put the the value from the Hostname directive inside the like this:NameVirtualHost *:80
Steve SwiftOn 22/08/06, RYAN vAN GINNEKEN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Using Apache/1.3.34 (Unix) PHP/4.4.2 config
47 matches
Mail list logo
