I think most sites which block it do it by checking the User-Agent header.
See http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/howto/access.html and also the docs for
mod_access if thats what you really want.
However if the web program changes its User-Agent to match that of a well
known browser like IE or F
On 7/27/06, LDB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joshua Slive wrote:
> On 7/27/06, LDB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Joshua Slive wrote:
>> > On 7/27/06, LDB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I am trying to put a symbolic link in the "Directory" directive's
>> >> argument list but it will not rec
Joshua Slive wrote:
On 7/27/06, LDB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joshua Slive wrote:
> On 7/27/06, LDB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I am trying to put a symbolic link in the "Directory" directive's
>> argument list but it will not recognize it. Is there anyway to
>> accomplish this idea?
>>
>>
On Thursday 27 July 2006 14:39, Neil A. Hillard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently using Apache 2.0 as an accelerator and performing a
> certain amount of HTTP / HTML rewriting successfully. I'm currently
> building a replacement server and am attempting to move to Apache 2.2
> but appear to be
My current situation of mod_authnz_ldap is still not good.
The issue was the ldap libraries which I had downloaded from the
OpenLDAP source.
The libraries were being installed in /usr/local/lib.
I had to point LDFLAGS to -L/usr/local/lib, and CPPFLAGS and CFLAGS to
-I/usr/local/include.
The Apache
I am not sure if this is the right place to ask or not. How do I go
about disabling the use of web accelerators like FasterFox or the Google
Web Accelerator? I have noticed that several sites now have a warning pop
up if you are using such a device and refuse you access until it is
turned off.
--
Joshua Slive wrote:
> On 7/27/06, Anton Piatek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I was messing around with my config earlier and seem to have screwed
>> something up. Apache2-ctl says the config is syntactically correct, but
>> the root of the server "/" does not serve any pages - I get file
On 7/27/06, Anton Piatek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I was messing around with my config earlier and seem to have screwed
something up. Apache2-ctl says the config is syntactically correct, but
the root of the server "/" does not serve any pages - I get file not
found even if the file is speci
Hi,
I was messing around with my config earlier and seem to have screwed
something up. Apache2-ctl says the config is syntactically correct, but
the root of the server "/" does not serve any pages - I get file not
found even if the file is specified (i.e. /index.html)
The error log just shows /htd
On 7/27/06, LDB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joshua Slive wrote:
> On 7/27/06, LDB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I am trying to put a symbolic link in the "Directory" directive's
>> argument list but it will not recognize it. Is there anyway to
>> accomplish this idea?
>>
>> And yes, I tried, Fol
Greetings,I'm running Apache 2.2.0-21 under SuSE, and having trouble with directory authentication. I want to authenticate user according to a remote ldap server.These are the parts I added to my httpd.conf
in order to make the authentication work:LoadModule ldap_module /usr/lib64/apache2/mod_lda
Just an update of my current case with Perl data-files.
I decided that suEXEC is a bit too advanced for me.
Instead, I created a folder with sufficient permissions outside the
document root to write/create/store the data-files.
I wonder how much a security risk this is compared to suEXEC.
The onl
Joshua Slive wrote:
On 7/27/06, LDB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am trying to put a symbolic link in the "Directory" directive's
argument list but it will not recognize it. Is there anyway to
accomplish this idea?
And yes, I tried, FollowSymLinks .. :)
I am using Apache 2.0 on SuSE 10.0 BTW .
On 7/27/06, LDB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am trying to put a symbolic link in the "Directory" directive's
argument list but it will not recognize it. Is there anyway to
accomplish this idea?
And yes, I tried, FollowSymLinks .. :)
I am using Apache 2.0 on SuSE 10.0 BTW ...
More details plea
On 7/27/06, Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah - run Windows based servers and you get case insensitive URLs.
No, you don't. You get a server that serves the same content for many
different URLs. That can have bad consequences on caches, search
engines, etc.
Joshua.
---
On 7/27/06, Craig M. Houck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I went back before this email and realized it wasn't the same.
I changed it so httpd.conf looks like:
# This is here for backwards compatability reasons and to support
# installing 3rd party modules directly via apxs2, rather than
# through
--- Keith A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am new to this site and have been reading through
> all the information
> presented here, but my search didn't answer my
> question.
Welcome to the group.
~snip~
>
> Anyway, if a visitor comes in to the site (and it
> apparently matters
> little w
My initial thought was perhaps it's a browser accelerator like
FasterFox, but then you would probably notice some patterns based on
browsers. Also you'd probably see more than just the root being
requested.
Where are your ads coming from - same server? What kind of pages are
they? Perhaps if y
sridevi polavaram skrev:
I am surpirsed that nobody has responded to my query since yesterday.
I am so desperate for help!!
If it is that urgent, I recommend you hire an consultant instead of
complaining about how people should handle their own free time.
N.
-
sridevi polavaram wrote:
I am surpirsed that nobody has responded to my query since yesterday. I
am so desperate for help!! I have done my best to solve the problem but
it wasn't successful. I am sure if you spend a few minutes you will know
that mine is a simple problem. Please help me!!
I don
I am surpirsed that nobody has responded to my query since yesterday. I am so desperate for help!! I have done my best to solve the problem but it wasn't successful. I am sure if you spend a few minutes you will know that mine is a simple problem. Please help me!!
I don't know if this query ever go
I am new to this site and have been reading through all the information
presented here, but my search didn't answer my question.
I run my site on an apache server and I have access to the raw apache
logs. Lately I've been analyzing these by hand to see a more complete
picture of where traffic is
Hey Folks,
We believe we've found a bug in mod_proxy_html 2.5.2 that causes an
"Error in bucket read". A patch is attached with verbose comments.
- Ryan
--- proxy_old/mod_proxy_html.c 2006-07-27 11:20:15.0 -0500
+++ proxy/mod_proxy_html.c 2006-07-27 11:22:09.0 -0500
@@ -858
I am trying to put a symbolic link in the "Directory" directive's
argument list but it will not recognize it. Is there anyway to
accomplish this idea?
And yes, I tried, FollowSymLinks .. :)
I am using Apache 2.0 on SuSE 10.0 BTW ...
Thanks,
LDB
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc Perkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I want case insensitive URLs.
Just out of interest, why?
The only reason I can imagine is that you have inherited a legacy
filesystem where people have been using haphazard file-naming
conventions and so you have a
I went back before this email and realized it wasn't the same.
I changed it so httpd.conf looks like:
# This is here for backwards compatability reasons and to support
# installing 3rd party modules directly via apxs2, rather than
# through the /etc/apache2/mods-{available,enabled} mechanism.
#
In 2.0 Apache mod spaling made the URL case insensitive. In 2.2 it
doesn't. That means that mod speling in 2.2 is broken.
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/
Nick Kew wrote:
On Thursday 27 July 2006 01:16, Marc Perkel wrote:
OK - So - this is a bug and needs to be fixed? You would think that an
HTTP server as popular as Apache would be able to support case
insensitive URLs.
There is no such thing as a "case insensitive URL"
On 7/27/06, Craig M. Houck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Josh;
Thanks for the help.
If you look back at the email you responded to I included httpd.conf and I
have the same entry there as userdir.conf.
No, you do not. Read your httpd.conf again.
Joshua.
---
Josh;
Thanks for the help.
If you look back at the email you responded to I included httpd.conf and I
have the same entry there as userdir.conf.
What files should I be including to get this problem solved?
thanks
Craig
At 09:21 AM 7/27/2006 -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
>On 7/27/06, chouck <[EMAI
Hi,
I'm currently using Apache 2.0 as an accelerator and performing a
certain amount of HTTP / HTML rewriting successfully. I'm currently
building a replacement server and am attempting to move to Apache 2.2
but appear to be having some problems using filters.
I need to insert proxy-html
I don't know if this query ever got posted..but i didn't get any reply so far.Dear Forum, I am posting a query for the first time. That too only because i didn't find any other resource for help!!I have successfully setup Virtualhost definition on my fedora 4 machine by modifyin the
httpd.conf
,
On 7/27/06, chouck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If I load http://bingiwas.binghamton.edu/~chouck into a browser I get an
error in my /var/apache2/error.log:
[Thu Jul 27 08:54:05 2006] [error] [client xxx.xxx.xx.xx] File does not
exist: /var/www/bingiwas/~chouck
/var/www/bingiwas is the Document
On 7/27/06, Greg Boug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm not sure if this one is possible, I'm attempting to use
a mod_rewrite rule to proxy to another URL, but for the
request it proxies to, I need it to keep the original source
IP address intact. At present, I have something along the
lin
What was suggested below didn't make it work.
> userdir.conf
> > ==
> >
> > UserDir public_html
> > UserDir disabled root
> >
> >
> > AllowOverride FileInfo AuthConfig Limit
> >
I tried what was suggested below. Still no working!
What follows is specific for my config.
If I load
> > I have my virtual host working now, the DNS person hadn't added it when I
> > thought.
> > However any http://vietualhost.com/~user is prefixing the DocumentRoot for
> > my virtual host. It
or include your includes in httpd.conf manually, in the right order.
2.2 uses conf/extra for additional includes.
also, if you know that the module is configured and installed, what
advantage does the IfModule offer?
Boyle Owen wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Andrew Walmsley [mail
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Walmsley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 11:48 AM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Best Practice Question
>
> We are porting a (mostly) perl application from Apache 1.X to
> Apache 2.X and decided to p
We are porting a (mostly) perl application from Apache 1.X
to Apache 2.X and decided to put all of the configuration for the application
into an etg.conf and put that in the conf.d directory. This failed, as it has
the lines . mod_perl is loaded from the perl.conf
(also in the conf.d). As e
Hi guys,
I'm not sure if this one is possible, I'm attempting to use
a mod_rewrite rule to proxy to another URL, but for the
request it proxies to, I need it to keep the original source
IP address intact. At present, I have something along the
lines of:
RewriteRule "^/$" http://server.com/start
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc Perkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 2:16 AM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Has mod speling changed?
>
> OK - So - this is a bug and needs to be fixed? You would
> think that an
> HTTP server as
41 matches
Mail list logo
