[EMAIL PROTECTED] Performance Tuning Documentation?

2006-07-09 Thread James W. Anderson
Does anyone have any recommendations for books, PDFs, or other forms of documentation that describe in detail how to tune Apache for performance?  I’ve read the tips on the Apache website, but I still have many questions about the way Apache handles requests, such as:   Why doesn’t it ret

[EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: Q: How to "force" HTTP 503 when Apache hits MaxClients

2006-07-09 Thread James W. Anderson
Does anyone happen to know what module this might be? -Original Message- From: Morgan Gangwere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2006 11:18 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Q: How to "force" HTTP 503 when Apache hits MaxClients somewhere ther

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Measuring Visits to Site - Anybody Use SiteMeter?

2006-07-09 Thread Morgan Gangwere
I use a Perl script that runs in a frame that people are GARUTEED to see. its simply called "counter.pl" and it uses a text file called "cout.dat" in the ../etc/ directory. the file structure should be as follows: . ./cgi-bin/ ./cgi-bin/counter.pl (whatever else is in the cgi-bin directory) (any o

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: .htaccess help

2006-07-09 Thread Morgan Gangwere
i had to deal with this earlier. I put the command ' overrideAccess wwwroot ' and I used the read/write permissions of d rwx r-- --- and used nothing to destoy the file permissions. On 7/9/06, Noel Stratton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Your stated solution was "Require user non-existent-user in

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .htaccess help

2006-07-09 Thread Noel Stratton
Your stated solution was "Require user non-existent-user in the sub-directory .htaccess files" This will prompt the user for a username and password correct? I guess this would work, but I was hoping to have the forbidden page come up right away instead of the authorization required page come

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Applying a universal rewrite

2006-07-09 Thread Andrew Clarke
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:31, Andrew Clarke wrote: > > [second posting; looks like the mailing list filters out messages > containing the name of real "somewhere unpleasant" websites...] Dammit my first posting finally arrived just as I sent this one on it's way. I thought my first posting had been

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Applying a universal rewrite

2006-07-09 Thread Andrew Clarke
Hi folks, I've downloaded and installed the free "Lite" version of a very nice little tool which will allow me to know the country a connection is coming from; I'm going to use it to block users of my website based on country so that I can eliminate vast ranges of script kiddies trying to atta

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Applying a universal rewrite

2006-07-09 Thread Andrew Clarke
Hi folks, I've downloaded and installed the free "Lite" version of a very nice little tool which will allow me to know the country a connection is coming from; I'm going to use it to block users of my website based on country so that I can eliminate vast ranges of script kiddies trying to atta

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Change directory Apache looks for conf file in?

2006-07-09 Thread Joshua Slive
On 7/8/06, Evan Platt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At 07:46 AM 7/8/2006, you wrote: >You would probably need to "make clean; configure --options; make install". > >If you want to stick with the current install, you can use the -f >command line option (to apachectl or httpd) to tell it where to loo

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .htaccess help

2006-07-09 Thread Joshua Slive
On 7/8/06, Noel Stratton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is there a way to make the subdirectory .htacces file override the root? It depends on the specific circumstances. Some directives can be overriden, others can't. What was wrong with my suggested solution for your problem? Joshua.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] lost mod.access.so need some help getting it back

2006-07-09 Thread Jack Gates
On Sunday 09 July 2006 15:08, Jack Gates wrote: > On Sunday 09 July 2006 14:21, Jack Gates wrote: > > Apache was working fine I had not messed with the configuration at all, > > went to bed, got up, Apache no longer works and a file is gone. > > > > /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf is looking for > > /et

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] lost mod.access.so need some help getting it back

2006-07-09 Thread Jack Gates
On Sunday 09 July 2006 14:21, Jack Gates wrote: > Apache was working fine I had not messed with the configuration at all, > went to bed, got up, Apache no longer works and a file is gone. > > /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf is looking for /etc/httpd/modules/mod.access.so > > mod.access.so is not on my b

[EMAIL PROTECTED] lost mod.access.so need some help getting it back

2006-07-09 Thread Jack Gates
Apache was working fine I had not messed with the configuration at all, went to bed, got up, Apache no longer works and a file is gone. /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf is looking for /etc/httpd/modules/mod.access.so mod.access.so is not on my box anywhere I did not delete it and I did not change the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] bug 18388 (Set-Cookie header not honored on 304 (Not modified) status)

2006-07-09 Thread Qingshan Xie
I also read it, seems the report/patch is pretty old,applicable to the Apache-2.0.44/2.0.54. Not sure if this patch is still suitable for 2.0.58, and especially if 2.2.2 has already included this feature? Many Thx, Q.Xie --- Asaf Dalet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > There was a fix for

[EMAIL PROTECTED] bug 18388 (Set-Cookie header not honored on 304 (Not modified) status)

2006-07-09 Thread Asaf Dalet
Hi,   There was a fix for this bug that added AllowSetCookieOnNotModified to the Apache configuration file (see http://hypermail.linklord.com/new-httpd/2003/Jun/0679.html ).   Was this fix eventually applied? in what version? is there an option to set it programatically, from module code?   thanks

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd 2.2.2 manual problem

2006-07-09 Thread Jim the Standing Bear
I solved the problem.  The DefaultLanguage in conf/extra/httpd-languages.conf is not set by default, so I uncommented it and set it to en, and everything works.  Thank you for responding, Pid. On 7/9/06, Pid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: check that the manual include conf file is enabled, near the end

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd 2.2.2 manual problem

2006-07-09 Thread Jack Gostl
Anyone out there using the Windows binary? I can't seem to get the server side includes working. I'm an Apache veteran, but a novice to the Windows release.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd 2.2.2 manual problem

2006-07-09 Thread Pid
check that the manual include conf file is enabled, near the end of the httpd.conf Jim the Standing Bear wrote: > hello, > > I just downloaded, compiled and installed httpd 2.2.2. The installation > went fine, however, I wasn't able to read the documentation in the > docs/manual/ directory.