Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Getting Apache to use PHP under Window XP

On 6/1/06, chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/1/06, Martyn Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It is where it is specified. But I have moved it around a bit, into the > modules folder and just specifying modules/php5apache.dll but same failure. > I have tried various combinations of abs

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Getting Apache to use PHP under Window XP

On 6/1/06, Martyn Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It is where it is specified. But I have moved it around a bit, into the modules folder and just specifying modules/php5apache.dll but same failure. I have tried various combinations of absolute and relative paths, tried adding quotes and wi

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Getting Apache to use PHP under Window XP

The announcement.txt file on the Apache download site says it all, modules must be recompiled, and may require source changes. 2.2.2 -> 2.2.22 won't require you to recompile your modules. 2.2.2 -> 2.4.0 will require you to recompile your modules. Looks like PHP's bad, in labeling their download

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Getting Apache to use PHP under Window XP

I am a little confused by your comment. I am running Apache 2.2.2, and the latest Win32 release of PHP is 5.1.4. The php5apache2.dll version is 5.1.4.4. The only doc I have found indicates this is for Apache V2 and I took that to mean V2.* If that is NOT the case, it would suggest that there is n

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Getting Apache to use PHP under Window XP

Martyn Griffin wrote: I even pulled the dll out of the distribution zip file again and retried and it still fails. If anyone has this running (PHP 5.1.4 and Apache 2.2), could you show the relevant entries from your .conf file etc. Using the version ***compiled for*** apache 2.2? If is was

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2: No groups file?

I'm trying to use a (rather old) module called mod_auth_mda to do cookie authentication. The new Apache 2.2 authentication stuff is confusing me though. Relevant config file lines: LoadModule authz_host_module modules/mod_authz_host.so LoadModule auth_basic_module modules/mod_auth_basic.so Lo

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Getting Apache to use PHP under Window XP

It is where it is specified. But I have moved  it around a bit, into the modules folder and just specifying  modules/php5apache.dll but same failure. I have tried various combinations of absolute and relative paths, tried adding quotes and without, renamed the dll to .so etc etc In all cases

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Duplicated entries in mime.types

Hi! This is my first post to the list, so before all, I would like to introduce myself. I'm a spanish student and I'm developing my thesis project, which is a graphical application to configure a remote Apache httpd server. It connects to the host through SSH to download the configuration files, p

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache not sending page content

On 5/31/06, William Knechtel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Everyone, I've just configured a new virtual host on my apache server. It is currently the only http virtual host (the others are https). When I try to visit the site, all I get is a blank page. Looking in the error logs, there are

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Authentication Troubles

On 5/31/06, Fenlason, Josh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think that's correct. AuthBasicProvider is supposed to be the alias which I named "test" in the AuthProviderAlias directive. It behaves even worse, never allows me to log on, if I change it to "ldap". http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/m

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache not sending page content

Hello Everyone, I've just configured a new virtual host on my apache server. It is currently the only http virtual host (the others are https). When I try to visit the site, all I get is a blank page. Looking in the error logs, there are no seg faults or anything else to indicate proble

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] access control

yea.. you're going to need a couple more directives, and you may have to go to the online docs, or someone else may chime in, but my first stab would be to add .. AuthType Basic AuthName "Magicenglish Files" AuthBasicProvider file AuthUserFile ".../passwd/passwords" Require user username Allow

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] access control

I would guess you need a "satisfy any" directive.. but you're not posting how you have things configured... so no se. Options Indexes FollowSymLinks AllowOverride None Order allow,deny Allow from #host list# This is the following directory directive I want protected if the IP i

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] access control

Bobby Gontarski wrote: I need the following: Allow access from certain IPs to a certain directory and if the user does not come from that IP I need to authenticate him/her using the password file. I can do one or the other - either certain IPs are allowed and others are not or the access is

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] access control

I would guess you need a "satisfy any" directive.. but you're not posting how you have things configured... so no se. -ds - Original Message - From: "Bobby Gontarski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 4:22 PM Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] access control I need the

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Duplicated entries in mime.types

Hi! This is my first post to the list, so before all, I would like to introduce myself. I'm a spanish student and I'm developing my thesis project, which is a graphical application to configure a remote Apache httpd server. It connects to the host through SSH to download the configuration files, p

[EMAIL PROTECTED] access control

I need the following: Allow access from certain IPs to a certain directory and if the user does not come from that IP I need to authenticate him/her using the password file. I can do one or the other - either certain IPs are allowed and others are not or the access is controled based on password

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Authentication Troubles

I think that's correct. AuthBasicProvider is supposed to be the alias which I named "test" in the AuthProviderAlias directive. It behaves even worse, never allows me to log on, if I change it to "ldap". http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_authn_alias.html#authnprovidera lias Or am I off base

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Authentication Troubles

On 5/31/06, Fenlason, Josh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: AuthBasicProvider test That doesn't look right. Should be "ldap". Joshua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://h

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Authentication Troubles

I'm trying to move to Apache 2.2.2 and I'm running into some authentication troubles.  When I enter the correct username/password it authenticates properly.  When I enter an invalid username, I get prompted up to three times and it fails with a 401 like expected.  My problem is when I atte

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Many logs or one?

On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 12:09:00PM CDT, Mike Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : : We currently log all the virtual host activity to individual log files. : Would it be more efficient to log to single logfile that's later split for : each vhost? Or would that make the disk utilization worse? Or

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Many logs or one?

Apart from certain usage - like MP3 or video streaming on a 100 or 1000Mbps line -, the bottleneck is not the disk subsystem, but the CPU is, the average load of 2 also shows this. Using a RAID1 array also decreases stress on the disks, the 4.5% iowait avg is not an issue - and logging into differ

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] problem with rewriterule, handlers and documentroot

On 5/30/06, Sebastian Boehm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, assume the following enviroment: (Apache 1.3.33) DocumentRoot /dummy RewriteRule ^(.*)$ /dummy/demo$1 the rewrite rule magically sets the documentroot to /dummy/demo , when the flag [PT] is used it does not change the documentroot. W

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Many logs or one?

Hi Mike, Well, the above LAMP configuration is way under this, built from dust-covered parts picked out from the trash, and it's hard to find 2 gig memory in the trash... :) About the main question, having 250 different logfiles is not a number that a usual webserver would cry about, even if it

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reverse Proxy Cache not Caching in 2.2.2

Yes- my mind choked and read "2.2" instead of "2.2.2"- Anyway- looking at the log lines he sent later, perhaps this gives a clue: > [Tue May 30 11:29:34 2006] [warn] [client 10.6.3.3] proxy: no HTTP 0.9 request (with no host line) on incoming request and preserve host set forcing hostname

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Many logs or one?

I'm running a couple Redhat servers with Apache 1.3.36 (which my company is sticking with for legacy reasons; I'm sure we'll move to 2.0 or 2.2 eventually, but everyone here other than me has only used 1.3). It's a typical LAMP setup. There's about 250 virtual hosts on a handful of IPs on the s

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to configure access control for jkmount urls?

I use a Location directive. See: . More or less works the same as Directory, except it's based on the URL not the filesystem location. Options Indexes MultiViews AllowOverride None Order Allow,Deny Allow from 452.445.451.

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE [EMAIL PROTECTED] What tomcat connector to use?

I get error during configure command no apache given How do I resolve this. From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org To: Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE [EMAIL PROTECTED] What tomcat connector to use? Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 18:12:06 +0200 >The application I use "Lawson" onl

[EMAIL PROTECTED] RE [EMAIL PROTECTED] What tomcat connector to use?

>The application I use "Lawson" only supports on AIX system 5.2 Apache 2.0.x, >tomcat 4.1, so cant use apache 2.2.2 and tomcat 5.5. Does "Lawson" any third-party modules [which you can not compile yourself ] inside the Apache 2.0.x ? Only than you are bound to 2.0.x. The only thing what is need

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] What tomcat connector to use?

Do I have to still build the mod_jk with tomcat 5.5? Yes, but if it's a problem, maybe your distribution already have a package for it. Anyway, as Ricardo said, if you can go with Apache 2.2, you can use mod_proxy_ajp Regards, Gaël

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] What tomcat connector to use?

The application I use "Lawson" only supports on AIX system 5.2 Apache 2.0.x, tomcat 4.1, so cant use apache 2.2.2 and tomcat 5.5. From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org To: Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] What tomcat connector to use? Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 17:49:08 +0200

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] What tomcat connector to use?

johnny page wrote: > Do I have to still build the mod_jk with tomcat 5.5? Go with apache 2.2.x and you won't need mod_jk... That's your best option... > > >> From: "Gaël Lams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org >> To: users@httpd.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] What tomcat connector to use?

Do I have to still build the mod_jk with tomcat 5.5? From: "Gaël Lams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] What tomcat connector to use? Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 17:43:15 +0200 On 5/31/06, johnny page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[EMAIL PROTECTED] no apache given

Trying to build my mod_jk.so for apache 2058 with tomcat 5028 and connector 1.215, and during the configure I get the message in output NO APACHE GIVEN I then perform the make and build the mod_jk.so module, but when I start apache I get error ../apachectl start ../apachectl[80]: 1691682 S

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] What tomcat connector to use?

>I have installed Apache 2.0.58, and Tomcat 5.0.28. Is there a recommendation to use 2.0.x with Tomcat 5.0.x. The best choice will be Apache 2.2.2 and Tomcat 5.5.17. > What Tomcat version connector do I download > and install to build the mod_Jk.so module > on unix server. With an Apache 2.2.2 yo

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] What tomcat connector to use?

On 5/31/06, johnny page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have installed Apache 2.0.58, and Tomcat 5.0.28. What Tomcat version connector do I download and install to build the mod_Jk.so module on unix server. I would advise to use Tomcat 5.5.x and mod_jk, just download the last stable version from

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Running PHP as CGI without Shebang

On 5/31/06, nocturnal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi I've tried a few alternative solutions but i can't remember if a global ScriptAlias was one of them. Possibly only a global Alias. I will try it as soon as i get some time for it. The configuration is as follows in each vhost. AddHandler ph

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Running PHP as CGI without Shebang

Hi I've tried a few alternative solutions but i can't remember if a global ScriptAlias was one of them. Possibly only a global Alias. I will try it as soon as i get some time for it. The configuration is as follows in each vhost. AddHandler php-v4 .php Action php-v4 /cgi-bin/program.cgi T

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reverse Proxy Cache not Caching in 2.2.2

Well, the second response is definitively not served from cache (nor the first one for that matter). The cache provider definitively tries to store the response (measning that there is nothing in the headers preventing the response from being cached) in both cases and declines to serve the respo

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] trying to make so-called generic apache work with oracle app server 10.1.3's oc4j

On 5/31/06, Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wednesday 31 May 2006 09:25, Imre Oolberg wrote: > Dear people, > > I have an assignment to deploy Oracle Application Server 10.1.3's OC4J > component behind Generic Apache v. 2.0.x webserver Why 2.0? Upgrade to 2.2 and it supports oracle direc

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] authnz_ldap

When I do that my user/pass does not work and the error log gives this: [Wed May 31 09:38:14 2006] [warn] [client xx.xx.xx.xx] [1257] auth_ldap authenticate: user kckepple authentication failed; URI / [User not found][No such object] [Wed May 31 09:38:14 2006] [error] [client xx.xx.xx.xx] user kck

[EMAIL PROTECTED] What tomcat connector to use?

I have installed Apache 2.0.58, and Tomcat 5.0.28. What Tomcat version connector do I download and install to build the mod_Jk.so module on unix server. _ FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar – get it now! http://toolbar

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Running PHP as CGI without Shebang

On 5/31/06, nocturnal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi I've managed to configure my vhosts to run PHP as CGI without the need for a Shebang and 755 permissions on PHP script files. The only problem, a big problem in my opinion, is that i need to create a cgi-bin directory in each vhosts web root di

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gallery version 2.0.2

Hi R, It worked Changing the locking mechanism. You are the best!!! I have been trying to get my "professional" to help me with this for months. Check out my gallery page on my site experiencesquam.com. Thank you for taking the time to email me back! C - Original Message -

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Need help with mod_layout

On 5/23/06, Hex Star <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: but in the error_log for apache I still get an 500 error for the header and footer saying "premature end of script" like it's expecting it to still be a cgi/php script...running the latest version of the mod_layout module ( 3.2.1) which compiled an

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_deflate/mod_filter configuration

On Wednesday 31 May 2006 11:10, ROLLER Carl wrote: > mod_deflate Apache 2.2.2 configuration: > DeflateBufferSize 8192 > DeflateCompressionLevel 6 > DeflateFilterNote Ratio ratio > DeflateMemLevel 9 > DeflateWindowSize 15 > FilterDeclare comp-resp > FilterProvider comp-resp DEFLATE Request_URI > /\

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Running PHP as CGI without Shebang

Hi I've managed to configure my vhosts to run PHP as CGI without the need for a Shebang and 755 permissions on PHP script files. The only problem, a big problem in my opinion, is that i need to create a cgi-bin directory in each vhosts web root directory and place a copy of the php binary int

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_deflate/mod_filter configuration

Does anyone use mod_deflate with mod_filter in Apache 2.2.x? -Message d'origine- De : ROLLER Carl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : mercredi 24 mai 2006 18:54 À : users@httpd.apache.org Objet : [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_deflate/mod_filter configuration Hi, I want to use mod_deflate (in Apa

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] trying to make so-called generic apache work with oracle app server 10.1.3's oc4j

On Wednesday 31 May 2006 09:25, Imre Oolberg wrote: > Dear people, > > I have an assignment to deploy Oracle Application Server 10.1.3's OC4J > component behind Generic Apache v. 2.0.x webserver Why 2.0? Upgrade to 2.2 and it supports oracle directly through DBD. Or of course use oracle's product

[EMAIL PROTECTED] How to configure access control for jkmount urls?

Hello,   I have to configure an ip filter for certain urls which I pass to a tomcat server. How can I do this? I suppose Something like this won’t work:   requestUrl">    Options Indexes MultiViews    AllowOverride None    Order allow,deny    Allow from 452.445.451

[EMAIL PROTECTED] trying to make so-called generic apache work with oracle app server 10.1.3's oc4j

Dear people, I have an assignment to deploy Oracle Application Server 10.1.3's OC4J component behind Generic Apache v. 2.0.x webserver ie to forward request thru Apache using mod_oc4j to the servlets provided by OAS. As i understood from Oracle® HTTP Server Administrator's Guide C.7 Integrati

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reverse Proxy Cache not Caching in 2.2.2

Yes, I confirm I'm running 2.2.2 and I have checked the patch that was provided for a similar problem in 2.2.0 has been applied. Here are the logs for two consecutive requests for the same file: [Tue May 30 11:29:34 2006] [debug] mod_cache.c(129): Adding CACHE_SAVE filter for /14k/13115/13115_4

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reverse Proxy Cache not Caching in 2.2.2

This is definitely not the same problem. First of all the problem was fixed in 2.2.1 and the original poster reports using 2.2.2. Second, I do not see any mention of caching the response under the key http://_default_:80/ like in your case. Frankly, I do not see anything indicating the respon