Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [error] (9)Bad file descriptor: apr_socke t_accept: (client socket)

2006-05-19 Thread jh
Could you tell me a little more about your setup? Kernel, CPU (32-bit or 64-bit), filesystem (ReiserFS or ?), compiler version, etc.? Are you running 2.2.2? I'd really appreciate knowing. I'm digging into this, one way or another. If it were just an occassional error message, I might ignore it,

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] url reformat - howto

2006-05-19 Thread Brian Rectanus
Argh, this was supposed to go to the list, too... From: Brian Rectanus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: May 19, 2006 9:14 AM Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] url reformat - howto To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Well, that is wrong, too: ProxyPass /mydir http://www.domain.com:8080/mydir/ should be: ProxyPass

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [error] (9)Bad file descriptor: apr_socket_accept: (client socket)

2006-05-19 Thread Brian Rectanus
I noticed this the other day. It happens whenever you stop the service as well. I have not dug any deeper into it, though. I am on RedHat AS3 and Apache 2.2.2. -B On 5/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've spent hours googling and asked about this error message on a PHP li

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Configuration given in online manual for php not working

2006-05-19 Thread chris
Hi, I am trying to use apache httpd 2.2 and php 5.1.4.4 on windows xp. the php was manually installed in c:/php when I add the following to httpd.conf (as given in online manual: http://us3.php.net/manual/en/install.windows.apache2.php): # # For PHP 5 do something like this: LoadModule php5_mo

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: "AddType application/x-httpd-php" behaves wrong in Mozilla/Ubuntu [solved]

2006-05-19 Thread nthwaver
Oops, sorry! The problem was solved when I cleared Mozilla's cache, since I had been troubleshooting earlier ... too late to prevent wasting your time, I'm afraid. Thanks anyway! Jordan On 5/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: After upgrading to the latest Apache and PHP on a

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apxs vs. configure to add modules

2006-05-19 Thread ohaya
Hi, This was with an older version of Apache (2.0.52), but I just did this this week to compile the mod_proxy modules on Solaris: cd /modules/proxy apxs -i -a -c *.c Jim JP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Ok, how about > > > > cd $source_dir/modules/proxy > > $apache-home/bin/apxs

[EMAIL PROTECTED] "AddType application/x-httpd-php" behaves wrong in Mozilla/Ubuntu

2006-05-19 Thread nthwaver
After upgrading to the latest Apache and PHP on a server running FreeBSD 6.0-release, I find that the "AddType application/x-httpd-php .php" line in httpd.conf is working everywhere except for *one* virtual host, accessed by *a single* browser. In other words, every v-host works as it always did

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Is Apache mod_aspdotnet alive?

2006-05-19 Thread WDaquell
The link to mod_mono for Windows is http://dev.anmar.eu.org/mono/mod_mono/ . Currently, though , it only appears to work with the Apache 2.0.x distribution. -Wraith Oluwatope Akinniyi wrote: Thanks Vic Feria and William Rowe. Vic Feria wrote: I think they have a windows version Can you

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Is Apache mod_aspdotnet alive?

2006-05-19 Thread Oluwatope Akinniyi
Thanks Vic Feria and William Rowe. Vic Feria wrote: I think they have a windows version Can you please point me to the windows version. I know of XSP on Windows and not mod_mono on Windows. And William Rowe wrote: Tope Akinniyi wrote: and does not run on Windows platform. Huh? Sin

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_cache

2006-05-19 Thread Joshua Slive
On 5/19/06, Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is there a better list to use for questions about core modules? Nope. This is the one. When I first start up Apache files are cached. But, once they expire then they are no longer cached and *always* fetch from the back end server. It's

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] piped log on Windows 2003 doesn't work

2006-05-19 Thread Debin Gao
Thanks for the reply. The same log.exe works well in accepting inputs in, e.g., "dir | log", so I don't see why it would fail when launched by httpd. As far as I know, httpd on windows is multi-threaded, meaning there is only one child that creates all the threads to handle requests. (There shou

[EMAIL PROTECTED] [error] (9)Bad file descriptor: apr_socket_accept: (c lient socket)

2006-05-19 Thread jh
I've spent hours googling and asked about this error message on a PHP list and was directed here. Every time I gracefully restart Apache 2.2.2, the error log reports: [Thu May 18 19:59:29 2006] [notice] Graceful restart requested, doing restart [Thu May 18 19:59:29 2006] [error] (9)Bad file des

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] piped log on Windows 2003 doesn't work

2006-05-19 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Have you enabled some exception handling that would bypass exceptions on cin? cin should be closed on the write end of the pipe, before or as the parent process exits. The only way this would fail is if somehow the write end of the pipe is inhereted by the child process. Launching your program

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_cache

2006-05-19 Thread Bill Moseley
Is there a better list to use for questions about core modules? I'm using mod_cache on Apache 2.0.55 (Debian Sid) with the following config: ProxyViaOn CacheRoot /var/cache/apache2/proxy CacheSize 1000 CacheMaxExpire 300 CacheIgnoreHead

[EMAIL PROTECTED] piped log on Windows 2003 doesn't work

2006-05-19 Thread DEBIN GAO
Hi, I'm trying to use the piped log on Windows 2003 (apache httpd 2.2), but it doesn't work. I tried it out on linux and it works great. My log.exe program is called 5 times when server starts, and were not killed after server stops. And my log.exe program doesn't seem to capture the logs.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] url reformat - howto

2006-05-19 Thread Krist van Besien
On 5/19/06, Oliver A. Rojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ok this is my whole config... ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] DocumentRoot /var/www/html ServerName mydomain.com.com ServerAlias www ProxyRequests off ProxyPass /mydir http://www.domain.com:8080/mydir/ ErrorLog log

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and Tomcat 4.0.6

2006-05-19 Thread Tribley William-cwt010
Hi Ricardo, You are right. I was thinking that if you are used to the Apache 1.3 world and have to read the new material on 2.2, Tomcat 5.5 and the way they connect, then install and test it, an hour will go by. Frankly I was amazed at how easy it was. I am a big Apache 2.2/Tomcat 5.5 fan. In

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apxs vs. configure to add modules

2006-05-19 Thread JP
> > Ok, how about > > cd $source_dir/modules/proxy > $apache-home/bin/apxs -i -a -c *proxy*.c > That compiles, but produces the symbol resolution error at runtime. I was wondering if I am missing something obvious. The docs say to use apxs to compile modules outside of the source tree, so I

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and Tomcat 4.0.6

2006-05-19 Thread Ricardo Stella
Tribley William-cwt010 wrote: > It only took about an hour to connect Apache 2.2 to Tomcat 5.5 . > Tomcat 5.5 also supports separate files to configure each webapp > instead of glomming it all in server.xml, a huge win for the > configuration management and risk management camps. > Bill > >

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and Tomcat 4.0.6

2006-05-19 Thread Tribley William-cwt010
Colleen, I strongly recommend going straight to Apache 2.2  and Tomcat 5.5. You can get rid of the (in my opinion horrible) mod_jk setups and all the tricky stuff involved with setting up Tomcat connectors. Over the past 4 years of working with Apache and Tomcat,  I wasted 2 days getting Apa

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and Tomcat 4.0.6

2006-05-19 Thread Colleen Cubitt
We are now using Apache 1.3.31 and Tomcat 4.0.6 on Unix.  We want to upgrade the Apache to 2.0.  Just wondering if anyone has done this, or if this will cause problems with Tomcat. Thanks Colleen

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apxs vs. configure to add modules

2006-05-19 Thread Richard de Vries
Ok, how about cd $source_dir/modules/proxy $apache-home/bin/apxs -i -a -c *proxy*.c I know I got it to work using some sort of wildcards. I'll try to see if I can find it back in my shell's history. --- JP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I had a similiar problem with the mod_pr

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rotatelogs and rewriteLog

2006-05-19 Thread Browne, Anthony A
It didn't appear to be possible when I tried it, but I was wondering if someone knew a way to do it. We need to use the rewriteLog if our customers, who will use a gui to change the verbosity, experience problems. Our goal was to rotate the logs when they reached a certain size so they could be com

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rotatelogs and rewriteLog

2006-05-19 Thread Joshua Slive
On 5/19/06, Browne, Anthony A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello everyone, Is it possible to use rotatelogs with a rewriteLog on a Windows OS? If so, how. I've never tried it, but I don't believe this is possible. But you shouldn't need to rotate the RewriteLog. This should be used for

[EMAIL PROTECTED] rotatelogs and rewriteLog

2006-05-19 Thread Browne, Anthony A
Hello everyone, Is it possible to use rotatelogs with a rewriteLog on a Windows OS? If so, how. TIA - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html>

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hacked Web Site

2006-05-19 Thread Jaqui Greenlees
--- Don O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well I would tend to agree with you, except for the > fact that the 3 sites > did not use any SQL, they were all simple html sites > with very little > content. > > I did find something that referenced hidden field > injections as well, but > again, no

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apxs vs. configure to add modules

2006-05-19 Thread JP
> > I had a similiar problem with the mod_proxy modules, > but even specifiying these modules during the > "./configure" phase did not work properly for me. > > Try this: > > cd $source_dir/modules/proxy > $apache-home/bin/apxs -i -a -c *.c > > R. > Hey. Here's what I get: Put a

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hacked Web Site

2006-05-19 Thread Bill Jones
On 5/19/06, Don O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well I would tend to agree with you, except for the fact that the 3 sites did not use any SQL, they were all simple html sites with very little content. I did find something that referenced hidden field injections as well, but again, none of the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apxs vs. configure to add modules

2006-05-19 Thread Richard de Vries
I had a similiar problem with the mod_proxy modules, but even specifiying these modules during the "./configure" phase did not work properly for me. Try this: cd $source_dir/modules/proxy $apache-home/bin/apxs -i -a -c *.c R. --- JP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi. My question is: > I

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hacked Web Site

2006-05-19 Thread Don O'Neil
Well I would tend to agree with you, except for the fact that the 3 sites did not use any SQL, they were all simple html sites with very little content. I did find something that referenced hidden field injections as well, but again, none of the sites had hidden fields. This is why I am puzzled a

[EMAIL PROTECTED] problems setting up php

2006-05-19 Thread chris
Hi, I am trying to use apache httpd 2.2 and php 5.1.4.4 on windows xp. the php was manually installed in c:/php when I add the following to httpd.conf: # # For PHP 5 do something like this: LoadModule php5_module "c:/php/php5apache2.dll" AddType application/x-httpd-php .php # configure the pat

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hacked Web Site

2006-05-19 Thread Jaqui Greenlees
--- Don O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A customer of mine recently had their web site > hacked and the index file > defaced by Milli-Harekat... > > http://www.zone-h.org/en/search/what=Milli-Harekat.Org/ > > Does anyone know the exploit used for this and where > to find out about > fixing