[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subrequests to the web

Hi there, I'm an Apache newbie, and currently writing a filter that uses subrequests and runs them (in order to get a response) When the subrequests are sent for content located on my server, there's no problem. I get the response back to the right place and everything works fine. When I'm tryin

[EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritelock

Hi Guys,   I have written a rewritemap program and I am experiencing the sync issues that I have seen all over Google. I discovered the rewritelock option is used to prevent this from occurring, however I can’t seem to get apache to use one. I am using Apache 2.0.54-4 under Debian and it

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PING in scripts won't timeout. Trap problem?

Evan Platt wrote: On Mon, May 1, 2006 4:38 pm, Mark London wrote: A user at our site has complained that he when he tries to create a script (cgi or php) that uses PING, if the PING hits a node that doesn't respond (i.e. the node has a firewall), the PING never times out and the script hangs.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PING in scripts won't timeout. Trap problem?

On Mon, May 1, 2006 4:38 pm, Mark London wrote: > A user at our site has complained that he when he tries to create a > script (cgi or php) that uses PING, if the PING hits a node that doesn't > respond (i.e. the node has a firewall), the PING never times out and the > script hangs. From the comma

[EMAIL PROTECTED] PING in scripts won't timeout. Trap problem?

A user at our site has complained that he when he tries to create a script (cgi or php) that uses PING, if the PING hits a node that doesn't respond (i.e. the node has a firewall), the PING never times out and the script hangs. From the command line, PING will timeout. Would anyone have any i

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.2.2 msi build

How long till a 2.2.x build will be available for Windows? Thanks Mike - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-ma

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.58 for Windows?

Savage, Robert CTR USTRANSCOM J6 wrote: A simple http://apache.edgescape.com/httpd/binaries/win32/ would have been sufficient. According to http://apache.edgescape.com/httpd/binaries/win32/#released, v2.0.55 is still the current release. Yes, mea culpa. The language change necessitated by -win

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.58 for Windows?

A simple http://apache.edgescape.com/httpd/binaries/win32/ would have been sufficient. According to http://apache.edgescape.com/httpd/binaries/win32/#released, v2.0.55 is still the current release. --Doc Robert G. (Doc) Savage, CISSP, RHCE, GCIA Senior Systems Analyst BAE Systems Information Techn

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.0.58 Signing key changed?

On Monday 01 May 2006 21:49, B H wrote: > It appears that httpd-2.0.58.tar.gz is signed by Colm MacCarthaigh rather > than William Rowe (who is listed on the page > http://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi as being the signer for 2.0.55, and > has signed past releases I believe). Who signs it is simp

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2 as front end?

Hi all, I'm pretty new to the Apache config game :). Here's my setup: host A.com: - This is the main http server using named virtual hosts to control which web site is accessed (that is, one IP address + many named hosts). host B.domain.com: - Internal host that runs a web site on port 2002. Tha

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.0.58 Signing key changed?

On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 04:49:15PM -0400, B H wrote: > The public key for Colm MacCarthaigh is in the current KEYS file, but was > not availaible in the version I last downloaded - Can anyone (officially) > confirm that Colm MacCarthaigh is now signing the 2.0.x releases? I officially confirm it

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.0.58 Signing key changed?

It appears that httpd-2.0.58.tar.gz is signed by Colm MacCarthaigh rather than William Rowe (who is listed on the page http://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi as being the signer for 2.0.55, and has signed past releases I believe). The public key for Colm MacCarthaigh is in the current KEYS file

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.2 and php 5 problem

Thanks Nick for the info. So should I remove that piece of code?? Should it be replaced?? Reason I added it was because of a PHP install document I had in my files and part of the installation of PHP was to add those lines into the httpd.conf file. Thanks Kenny At 08:37 PM 5/1/2006 +0100, y

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.2 and php 5 problem

On Monday 01 May 2006 19:21, Ken Murach wrote: > > AddType application/x-httpd-php .php .phtml > AddType application/x-httpd-php-source .phps > Oh dear. That cargo-cult is deeply BAD for two reasons. That abuse of AddType was wrong in Apache 1.1, and everything since. -- Nick Kew ---

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .htaccess and WAP 1.1

On Monday 01 May 2006 19:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I guess a better question is: What format does Apache return to the > browser when a page is redirected? Is it HTML, WAP or something else? That's entirely up to the person configuring it. > The Not_working phone's accept also has */*.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.58 for Windows?

Savage, Robert CTR USTRANSCOM J6 wrote: I see that v2.0.58 has been released (just as André Malo predicted it would), but apparently only for UNIX. Does anyone have any idea when a MSI build for Windows might be posted? Need a handwritten postcard on engraved stationary to look? It's been th

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.2 and php 5 problem

Hi Rainier & Nick Thanks for your help with this. I figured out the problem. It was the code in the httpd.conf file for the php5 that was wrong. Originally line read: LoadModule php5_modulemodules/libphp5.so I changed this line to: LoadModule php5_modulelibexec/libphp5.so a

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .htaccess and WAP 1.1

Hello, I guess a better question is: What format does Apache return to the browser when a page is redirected? Is it HTML, WAP or something else? I did some more experimenting with another person's cell phone, and I found that their phone did NOT get the 404 message. Here are the WAP profiles o

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: ASP on Apache

There's also Apache::ASP which runs under mod_perl. It's not 100% compatible with "real" ASP, but should work for most applications... Issac Joost de Heer wrote: > a nn wrote: >> Hello >> >> How do I enable ASP on Apache server 2.0? Is it possible at all? > > Commercially, there's SUN ASP (

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.2 and php 5 problem

On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 02:00:08PM -0400, Ken Murach wrote: >BASEDIR: /usr/local Remember your ldd's output: libxml2.so.2 => /lib/libxml2.so.2 You see? Rainer - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apa

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.2 and php 5 problem

On Monday 01 May 2006 17:34, Ken Murach wrote: > itis-padlproxy1 # ./httpd -t > httpd: Syntax error on line 53 of /usr/local/apache2/conf/httpd.conf: > Cannot load /usr/local/apache2/modules/libphp5.so into server: ld.so.1: > ./httpd: fatal: relocation error: file > /usr/local/apache2/modules/libp

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.2 and php 5 problem

Hi Rainier, Thanks for your help/info. Yeah, I just remembered that I grabbed the latest libxml2 from Sunfreeware and installed it prior to installing apache/php (see below): itis-padlproxy1 # pkginfo -l SMClxml2 PKGINST: SMClxml2 NAME: libxml2 CATEGORY: application ARCH:

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.2 and php 5 problem

On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 01:32:42PM -0400, Ken Murach wrote: > Hi Rainier, > > I would imagine it should be ok? I didn't have any problems with same php > 5.0.5 for the apache 1.3.34 installation. The ./httpd -t command works fine > for that version. > > Do you think I should I should grab lates

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.2 and php 5 problem

Hi Rainier, I would imagine it should be ok? I didn't have any problems with same php 5.0.5 for the apache 1.3.34 installation. The ./httpd -t command works fine for that version. Do you think I should I should grab latest libxml2 and install that?? Thanks Kenny At 07:19 PM 5/1/2006 +0200,

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.2 and php 5 problem

On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 01:02:15PM -0400, Ken Murach wrote: > libxml2.so.2 => /lib/libxml2.so.2 Is this lib recent enough for php5? Rainer - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. Se

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.58 for Windows?

I see that v2.0.58 has been released (just as André Malo predicted it would), but apparently only for UNIX.  Does anyone have any idea when a MSI build for Windows might be posted?   --Doc Robert G. (Doc) Savage, CISSP, RHCE, GCIA Senior Systems Analyst BAE Systems Information Technolo

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.2 and php 5 problem

Hi Rainer, Here is the output from the ldd command: itis-padlproxy1 # ldd /usr/local/apache2/modules/libphp5.so libmysqlclient.so.14 => /usr/local/mysql-4.1.14/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.so.14 libresolv.so.2 =>/lib/libresolv.so.2 libm.so.1 => /lib/libm.so.1

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.2 and php 5 problem

On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 12:34:29PM -0400, Ken Murach wrote: > itis-padlproxy1 # ./httpd -t > httpd: Syntax error on line 53 of /usr/local/apache2/conf/httpd.conf: > Cannot load /usr/local/apache2/modules/libphp5.so into server: ld.so.1: > ./httpd: fatal: relocation error: file > /usr/local/apac

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 1.3.34 log file permission

On 5/1/06, Andrew Zeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, This question has probably been asked a thousand times before, but I cannot seem to get a straight answer. I have apache 1.3.34 installed on Solaris 8. Apache is run as root. The umask for root is 077 because of a security standard. O

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_cache

On 5/1/06, Michael Conlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm considering using mod_cache for a server but I haven't seen any documentation on how the cache handles updated files. Some of the files are updated on a semi-regular basis and the majority of it is never updated (though may be deleted). ca

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] png images are broken with reverse proxy

Sorry for delay, I was out of office. On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 13:56 +0200, Joost de Heer wrote: > > > > ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > DocumentRoot /var/www/html/ > > ServerName mydomain > > > > ProxyRequests off > > > >Order deny,allow > >Deny from all

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.2 and php 5 problem

Hi everyone, Does anyone know if there are issues between apache 2.2.0 and php 5.0.5 for Solaris unix?? I've recently installed apache 2.2.0 which was working fine. I then added the php 5.0.5 piece and now when I run the httpd -t command to verify syntax is still OK, I get the following the

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: ASP on Apache

a nn wrote: > Hello > > How do I enable ASP on Apache server 2.0? Is it possible at all? Commercially, there's SUN ASP (formerly Chilisoft): http://www.sun.com/download/products.xml?id=420a8e72 There's also mod_aspdotnet, and mod_mono, but they're both for asp.net I think. Joost

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_cache

I'm considering using mod_cache for a server but I haven't seen any documentation on how the cache handles updated files. Some of the files are updated on a semi-regular basis and the majority of it is never updated (though may be deleted). can someone toss me a pointer to the appropriate d

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Problem Installing Apache 2.2.2 on Linux

Utkarsh Sharma wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to install Apache web server on Linux(CentOS).I have downloaded > and installed it in the default dir i.e /usr/local/apache2.Now when i run > apachectl start in the /usr/local/apache2/bin , thr is a msg that this > command does not exit. Apart from the missi

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ASP on Apache

Sascha Kersken wrote: Hi, You actually have to buy another piece of software to support ASP.NET under Linux with Apache. I don't remember the name of the software. That's mod_adpdotnet which you don't actually have to buy because it's free software under the terms of the Apache Software Lic

[EMAIL PROTECTED] [2.2.2]: Pb with linking mod_ssl

Hi, CPPFLAGS: -I/usr/local/openssl-0.9.7a/include -I/usr/local/openldap-2.3.20/include LDFLAGS: -L/usr/local/openssl-0.9.7a/lib -L/usr/local/openldap-2.3.20/lib configure invoked as: ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/httpd-2.2.0 --enable-dav --enable-dav-fs --enable-so --with-berkeley-db --enable-l

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ASP on Apache

Hi, You actually have to buy another piece of software to support ASP.NET under Linux with Apache. I don't remember the name of the software. That's mod_adpdotnet which you don't actually have to buy because it's free software under the terms of the Apache Software License. See http://httpd

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ASP on Apache

You actually have to buy another piece of software to support ASP.NET under Linux with Apache. I don't remember the name of the software. Regards, ZK --- "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No. Learn ASP.NET > > a nn wrote: > > Hello > > > > How do I enable ASP on Apache

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: [Question] How to write driver to test my module for Unit Test?

Okamoto Toshiaki wrote: I have solved following problem by myself. They are a little difficult because that register HOOK Functions are MACRO. You'll have trouble here getting answers to most any development questions, as this list is user-oriented. You might try the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list for

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ASP on Apache

No. Learn ASP.NET a nn wrote: Hello How do I enable ASP on Apache server 2.0? Is it possible at all? Thank you Artem Nehamkin Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 1.3.34 log file permission

Hi all, This question has probably been asked a thousand times before, but I cannot seem to get a straight answer. I have apache 1.3.34 installed on Solaris 8. Apache is run as root. The umask for root is 077 because of a security standard. Our logs (error and access logs) are being generated w

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: [apachemlen] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Question] How to write driver to test my module for Unit Test?

I have solved following problem by myself. They are a little difficult because that register HOOK Functions are MACRO. T. Okamoto Okamoto Toshiaki wrote: > Hi! > I have one question. > I would like to test my modules. > [Question] How to write driver to call my_module, my_register_hook()? > Ex. >

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ASP on Apache

Hello   How do I enable ASP on Apache server 2.0? Is it possible at all?   Thank you Artem Nehamkin Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.2 Released

--- Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 01 May 2006 13:44, Jaqui Greenlees wrote: > > > Bondware, a hosting company I know, has a showcase > > site for their CMS script that is at a minimum at > any > > given time 700 users, I have seen it peak at 15 > > thousand. > > 15k concurrent

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.2 Released

On Monday 01 May 2006 13:44, Jaqui Greenlees wrote: > Bondware, a hosting company I know, has a showcase > site for their CMS script that is at a minimum at any > given time 700 users, I have seen it peak at 15 > thousand. 15k concurrent database connections (erk)? Or 15k including some database

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem Installing Apache 2.2.2 on Linux

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Utkarsh Sharma wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to install Apache web server on Linux(CentOS).I have downloaded > and installed it in the default dir i.e /usr/local/apache2.Now when i run > apachectl start in the /usr/local/apache2/bin , thr is a msg that thi

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.2 Released

--- Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 01 May 2006 13:04, Graham Frank wrote: > > Give it a whirl, ey? Oh how tempting ... Worker > peaks at 800 workers in > > the daytime. I could definantly give event a > whirl if I were willing to > > place it onto a mission critical web server.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.2 Released

Sure, if I can find the time. I have the next couple months filled with travel across the country. Adios. --Graham -Original Message- From: Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subj: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.2 Released Date: Mon May 1, 2006 7:32 am Size: 830 bytes To:

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.2 Released

Eh, no ssl on this server. The best way to test the mpm is under some load, at least. Otherwise, issues with it that don't present themselves under low load won't show. We actually test new technology on this server at night with the ability to switch back instantly if need be. I'll check it

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.2 Released

On Monday 01 May 2006 13:04, Graham Frank wrote: > Give it a whirl, ey? Oh how tempting ... Worker peaks at 800 workers in > the daytime. I could definantly give event a whirl if I were willing to > place it onto a mission critical web server. Come to ApacheCon, and see Colm's talk. AIUI he's h

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.2 Released

On Monday 01 May 2006 12:52, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > I can't reconcile your complaint Nick - he opened his comment that it's an > experimental MPM. How did Graham's comment imply that he didn't understand > it's still experimental? My first paragraph was a reply (albeit speculative) to the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.2 Released

Graham Frank wrote: Give it a whirl, ey? Oh how tempting ... Worker peaks at 800 workers in the daytime. I could definantly give event a whirl if I were willing to place it onto a mission critical web server. Hell, why not? It wouldn't be the most psychotic thing I've done in recent histor

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem Installing Apache 2.2.2 on Linux

Hi, I tried to install Apache web server on Linux(CentOS).I have downloaded and installed it in the default dir i.e /usr/local/apache2.Now when i run apachectl start in the /usr/local/apache2/bin , thr is a msg that this command does not exit. The undermentioned is the sequence of steps that i pe

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.2 Released

Give it a whirl, ey? Oh how tempting ... Worker peaks at 800 workers in the daytime. I could definantly give event a whirl if I were willing to place it onto a mission critical web server. Hell, why not? It wouldn't be the most psychotic thing I've done in recent history. --Graham From: "

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.2 Released

Nick Kew wrote: On Monday 01 May 2006 08:15, Graham Frank wrote: What about the event MPM? They list it as changed in the core enhancements, but it is still an experimental MPM. What's keeping it out of the production circuit? IMO removing the "experimental" branch from normal modules was a

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.2 Released

Graham Frank wrote: What about the event MPM? They list it as changed in the core enhancements, but it is still an experimental MPM. What's keeping it out of the production circuit? Primarilly because it's bleeding edge. Not serrated-knife style as perchild was - but simply not widely adopte

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.2 Released

Yevgen Borodin wrote: Why couldn't there be a stable 2.2.2 Win32 Apache release? So tired of random bugs in 2.0.55... :( Because Apache HTTP Server is a source code development project. We don't exist to help users of any specific platform. Binaries are provided at the convenience of a contri

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mod_rewrite] Content-type doesn't change, logs say otherwise

On Sun, 2006-04-30 at 14:50 -0400, Joshua Slive wrote: > On 4/29/06, Michał Pałka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > RewriteEngine on > > RewriteCond %{HTTP_ACCEPT} application/xhtml\+xml > > RewriteCond %{HTTP_ACCEPT} !application/xhtml\+xml\s*;\s*q=0 > > RewriteRule \.html$|/$ - "[T=application/xh

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.2 Released

On Monday 01 May 2006 08:15, Graham Frank wrote: > What about the event MPM? They list it as changed in the core > enhancements, but it is still an experimental MPM. What's keeping it out > of the production circuit? Feel free to try it. AIUI the main limitation is that it may not work with con

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.2 Released

What about the event MPM? They list it as changed in the core enhancements, but it is still an experimental MPM. What's keeping it out of the production circuit? --Graham -Original Message- From: Paul Querna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2006 11:09 PM To: dev@httpd.