Trying a mid-week repost... Seems to me it would be beneficial to be able
to do reverse proxying with mod_rewrite without adding specific
ProxyPassReverse directives.
Atle
-
Flying Crocodile Inc, Unix Systems Administrator
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Atle Veka wrote:
> Hi, I have run into a snag with
Hello, everyone (sorry for the slightly lengthy post)!
I am very interested in learning how to configure Apache's HTTPd in a
style similar to what most large web hosts use, minus anything that
would entirely over-complicate my slightly small setup (I only have a
handful of domains hosted). I am no
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 23:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have noticed that some webhosts add a "Hosted by BlahBlah.com" at the
> bottom of every page that they host.
Commonly done by totally messing with the HTML and relying
on error correction in browsers.
Also possible without damaging mark
> Actually, the reason you use a DMZ is because if a vulnerability is
> found in you web server and you box gets taken over, the hacker doesn't
> have access to your entire LAN, only stuff that is sitting in your DMZ
> (DeMilitarised Zone). You still firewall your DMZ, and usually have a
> 2nd fire
I have noticed that some webhosts add a “Hosted by
BlahBlah.com” at the bottom of every page that they host.
I currently have 3 websites (vhosts) based on my apache
server: mine and 2 others (www.cpcomputers.co.uk
www.simsony.co.uk and www.sexybotch.co.uk).
Is there a way of tagging
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone knew whether there is a Win32 port of Apache 2.2
yet? If so where could I get it? Thanks.
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/
You oughta look into mod-security. It allows you to do
some real neat stuff as far as "securing a webserver"
is concerned.
--- Kishore Jalleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yes SSL would be your best bet, with .htaccess your
> passwords would be
> travelling in plain text, so go for SSL...
>
> Ki
Hi,
I want to use pwauth for authentication on my apache.
I downloaded pwauth-2.3.2.tar.gz and compiled it.
Than I installed it in /usr/local/bin and "suid root" it (chmod +s pwauth)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/bin]# ll pwauth
-rwsr-sr-x1 root root16517 Mar 14 17:06 pwa
Hallo Nick,
thank you for the hint. We get no core files although ulimit is set to
unlimited for it. Does mod_backtrace still helps to analyze the problem
yet?
If so, what will mod_backtrace generate?
regards
Harald
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:58
yes SSL would be your best bet, with .htaccess your passwords would be travelling in plain text, so go for SSL...
Kishore Jalleda
On 3/14/06, Toto Capuccino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi everyone,I am using a monitoring tool -nagios- that is running through a web interface where you can config
That is correct. My understanding is that Cisco Pix 505 can't do the port
forwarding so that is the reason why I was looking on doing this.
Thanks
--
Paul Aviles
-- Original Message ---
From: "Gaël Lams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:14
Hi everyone,I am using a monitoring tool -nagios- that is running through a web interface where you can configure things. I really want avoid people from being able to log to that server or to know wich is coming in and out of the traffic. I am actually using authentication with .htaccess file. Is
Title: Reverse proxy with response update
Hi all,
I'm trying to have a special architecture I'm managing with my own java application for now.
The current flow is :
1. Send a request to a reverse proxy server (java servlet on tomcat), for example : http://myreverseproxy/GO_TO_www.another
Hi
> I am pulling my hair out with this. I have a single public IP and already
> have a web server redirected on the firewall from the external IP to the
> private IP of 10.5.36.5. Now I need to enable another box (10.5.36.6)
> running on port 80 to be accessible from the outside.
10.5.36.6 is a
On 14/03/06, Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Manilal K M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Dienstag, 14. März 2006 12:46
> > To: users@httpd.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Basic Authentication not working
> > in Gentoo Linux
> >
> > On
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:58, Harald Falkenberg wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> we are using apache 2.2.0 with php 5.1.1 (including access to Oracle
> database) on an solaris 10 machine. We noticed, that always a couple of
> request to the php pages lead to segmentation faults as we verified in the
> error l
> -Original Message-
> From: Manilal K M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Dienstag, 14. März 2006 12:46
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Basic Authentication not working
> in Gentoo Linux
>
> On 14/03/06, Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Another poi
I have tried with a fresh new Directory tag within the DocumentRoot.
The follwoing configuration was added
Options FollowSymLinks
Options +ExecCGI
AuthName "E-mail login:"
AuthType Basic
AuthUserFile /usr/local/bp/htpasswd
Require user manilal
Hallo,
we are using apache 2.2.0 with php 5.1.1 (including access to Oracle
database) on an solaris 10 machine. We noticed, that always a couple of
request to the php pages lead to segmentation faults as we verified in the
error log. A reload of the requested page works often without any problem.
On 14/03/06, Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another point:
>
> Are you sure you are accessing the resource via this VH? I notice it's a
> cgi-bin directory... Is there another VH container that could be allowing
> access via a ScriptAlias or something?
There is no other virtual host. But
Another point:
Are you sure you are accessing the resource via this VH? I notice it's a
cgi-bin directory... Is there another VH container that could be allowing
access via a ScriptAlias or something?
The point I'm making is that your access control is only valid in the scope of
BTW - I gu
> -Original Message-
> From: Manilal K M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Dienstag, 14. März 2006 12:18
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Basic Authentication not working
> in Gentoo Linux
>
> There was no other "AuthConfig",
AuthConfig is the argument to t
On 14/03/06, Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Manilal K M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Dienstag, 14. März 2006 11:06
> > To: users@httpd.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Basic Authentication not working
> > in Gentoo Linux
> >
> >
On 14/03/06, Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 March 2006 08:55, Manilal K M wrote:
>
> >
>
> So you're "Wraith Enterprises" of Texas?
I didn't got you :) I just put a arbitrary hostname.
> -Original Message-
> From: Manilal K M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Dienstag, 14. März 2006 11:06
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Basic Authentication not working
> in Gentoo Linux
>
>I have comment out the directive _AllowOverride AuthConfig_ as
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 08:55, Manilal K M wrote:
>
So you're "Wraith Enterprises" of Texas?
--
Nick Kew
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html
On 14/03/06, Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Manilal K M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Dienstag, 14. März 2006 09:55
> > To: users@httpd.apache.org
> > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Basic Authentication not working in
> > Gentoo Linux
> >
> > Hello
> -Original Message-
> From: Manilal K M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Dienstag, 14. März 2006 09:55
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Basic Authentication not working in
> Gentoo Linux
>
> Hello all,
>I am a newbie in apache, less than 2 weeks of experien
Hello all,
I am a newbie in apache, less than 2 weeks of experience. I am
trying to protect one of my directory in the web server with Basic
authentication. I am using Gentoo Linux with apache-2.0.55. I see that
auth_module is loaded as a Module. I have configured the Virtual Host
like this. Th
> -Original Message-
> From: David P. Donahue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Montag, 13. März 2006 17:14
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSL And Virtual Hosts
>
>
> The most we're talking about here is a username/password for
> forums/ftp/webmail. I def
30 matches
Mail list logo
