RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CNAME and A records not working?

> -Original Message- > From: RYAN vAN GINNEKEN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Mittwoch, 8. März 2006 05:23 > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CNAME and A records not working? > > Been rackin my brain on this one First: Forget apache. You have to get DNS working

[EMAIL PROTECTED] pkgadd

Hi All I have a situation is that i dont have root access on this solaris box I have a precompiled apache 1.3.33 package. I am stuck with the below error [EMAIL PROTECTED]/qrq/suds_20_dir# pkgadd -R /home/qrq/suds_20_dir/apache apache-1.3.33-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg pkgadd: ERROR: You must be "roo

[EMAIL PROTECTED] CNAME and A records not working?

Been rackin my brain on this one I have a vhost in apache called host1.com it have a serveralias of www.host1.com. I used to use a DNS CNAME for the www.host1.com and then create another virtual host for that too. So i had 2 virtual host containers for almost every site seems a bit cleaner a

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: HTTPd 2.2 Binaries

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Keep your eyes peeled for the 2.2.1 release announcement When will that be out? - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.ht

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: HTTPd 2.2 Binaries

Grayson Mixon wrote: I saw that the Windows source code has been released for Apache Web Server 2.2, but I don't see the binaries for Windows. When will those be available? There are some external builds of 2.2.0 created outside of the ASF. To answer your question from the httpd project, the

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: HTTPd 2.2 Binaries

I saw that the Windows source code has been released for Apache Web Server 2.2, but I don't see the binaries for Windows. When will those be available? - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.0 Sends No More Than 255 Bytes.

On Tuesday 07 March 2006 04:40 pm, Nick Withers wrote: > On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 10:11:47 -0600 > > From an earlier thread: > > Dick Middleton wrote: > > > I've been having real trouble getting apache2.2 to work on Devil-Linux > > > 1.2.9. Apache has upgraded from 2.0.53 to 2.2.0 and the linux kernel

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.0 Sends No More Than 255 Bytes.

On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 10:11:47 -0600 Mark A Framness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Greetings, > > I have an Apache 2.2.0 MySQL and PHP 5.1.2 installation setup. In addition I > have an Apache 2.0.52 installation as well. > > The symptom: > Apache 2.2.0 is unable to send more than 255 bytes of HTML

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reverse proxy help

On 3/7/06, Dimitri Yioulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I did just that, and got an internal server error message. error_log shows > the following: > > [Tue Mar 07 13:26:24 2006] [error] SSL Proxy requested for > www.mywebserver.com:443 but not enabled [Hint: SSLProxyEngine] > [Tue Mar 07 13:26:2

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reverse proxy help

On Tuesday March 07 2006 11:54 am, Joshua Slive wrote: > On 3/7/06, Dimitri Yioulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello to all. > > > > I must be the lamest person in the world - can't seem to get reverse > > proxy right. > > > > Some info.: apache 2.0.16 running on CentOS 3.6. > > > > I have add

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] General question - Apache 2.0.55 webdav problem ?

Operator error. I mistakenly deleted the DavLockDB directive from the configuration. Put the directive back in and it works. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Slive Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 10:53 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Sub

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reverse proxy help

On 3/7/06, Dimitri Yioulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello to all. > > I must be the lamest person in the world - can't seem to get reverse proxy > right. > > Some info.: apache 2.0.16 running on CentOS 3.6. > > I have added a redirect directive to httpd.conf so that when a user goes to > http:

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] General question - Apache 2.0.55 webdav problem?

On 3/7/06, Schultz, Gary - COMM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have two servers with the same webdav configuration and NT file > permissions. On the server running Windows 2000 Apache 2.0.50 webdav works > as expected while on the server running Apache 2.0.55 webdav does not work, > I keep gettin

[EMAIL PROTECTED] General question - Apache 2.0.55 webdav problem?

I have two servers with the same webdav configuration and NT file permissions. On the server running Windows 2000 Apache 2.0.50 webdav works as expected while on the server running Apache 2.0.55 webdav does not work, I keep getting a 403 error Forbidden message. Is there a problem with webda

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.0 Sends No More Than 255 Bytes.

Greetings, I have an Apache 2.2.0 MySQL and PHP 5.1.2 installation setup. In addition I have an Apache 2.0.52 installation as well. The symptom: Apache 2.2.0 is unable to send more than 255 bytes of HTML data to the requesting client. As long as the file is small Apache 2.2.0 sends it on, but

[EMAIL PROTECTED] RADIUS and Subversion config

Hello, I'm having some problems configuring Apache while serving Subversion Repositories in conjunction with RADIUS authentication. The basic configuration of Apache with DAV svn works perfectly for anon access: DAV svn SVNParentPath /opt/svn In addition, I have added the FreeRadius mod_a

[EMAIL PROTECTED] .htaccess and PAM?

Hello *, I am hacking down an "office" like and need secured access to it using Debian GNU/Linux Sarge, apache 1.3 and php5. Is it possible to use PAM for autentification insteed of .htaccess? If not, how can I use PAM in php5? Note: I use PAM with libpam-pgsql1 an

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newbie with Install Problem

List,    I have discovered what my problem was.  Apparenly the install program attempts to make a connection to the web while on this initial screen.  In my case I have Norton Internet Security installed (this is a dev. machine) and it blocked the attempt.  I would normally expect Norton to pop-up

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Reverse proxy help

Hello to all. I must be the lamest person in the world - can't seem to get reverse proxy right. Some info.: apache 2.0.16 running on CentOS 3.6. I have added a redirect directive to httpd.conf so that when a user goes to http://www.mywebsite.com/webmail, he/she ends up at https://mailserver.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] possible memory leak in line ending conversion?

Before submitting this to bugzilla, I wanted to see if anyone else has run across this and found a solution. I didn't run across anything in the archives, but it could have been my search word choices. We are seeing huge amounts of memory being used when text is converted from UNIX li

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] signal Segmentation fault (11)

You need to get the core file and load it into a debugger in order to try to figure out where the signal is raised. How to get the core file depends on your OS. On Solaris you need to enable core dumps using coreadm. I believe that by default the core file should be generated in the apache root