On Thursday 05 January 2006 05:01, Jason Williard wrote:
> I am building a set of web servers that will be running both Apache 1.3.x
... three years obsolete ...
> and a version of the 2.x branches. My question is quite simple... Which
> version is recommended? Is the 2.2 branch stable enough a
Hi,
Is it possible to redirect all my request to particular domain and get response back to browser
Example::
req1 ===>
http://hostname:8080/app1
-> It want to be redirect to www.yahoomail.com
req2 ===>
http://hostname:8080/app2
-> it want to be redirect to www.yahoomail.co
If the application is "Currently" only working on Apache 1.3, then I would
keep it there.
If you are going to start "Development" today, and it takes you a while
to get the new application online. Then I would look at having the 2.x on
line also. If the technology and any bugs are present as o
The servers will serve two purposes.
1) Serving current applications designed for Apache 1.3 (ergo that version).
Some new development will take place in the area, but mostly in the form of
upgrading and enhancing current applications.
2) Serving new applications designed around the latest tech
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 1/4/2006 at 9:01 PM Jason Williard wrote:
>I am building a set of web servers that will be running both Apache 1.3.x
>and a version of the 2.x branches. My question is quite simple... Which
>version is recommended? Is the 2.2 branch stable enough a
I am building a set of web servers that will be running both Apache 1.3.x
and a version of the 2.x branches. My question is quite simple... Which
version is recommended? Is the 2.2 branch stable enough and supported
enough or should I install 2.0 for the time being and upgrade to 2.2 in the
futur
Hello,
The WiderNet Project, www.widernet.org, is looking for people who have
lots of Apache experience who would like to volunteer some of their
time on an Apache project.
If you are interested in volunteering some of your expertise, here are a
few of the topics we need help with:
- fin
Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV wrote:
In your conf below, you use the same certificate in both VH although the
ServerName are different.
All requests will be handled by the grundfunk VH regardless of whether you
request grundfunk.de or ronalter.de.
If you add
CustomLog /etc/apache2/log/grundfunk_
Hi!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this any good?
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/apache/2005/02/17/apacheckbk.html
very helpful website, thanks!
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See h
Hi Axel-Stéphane!
Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV wrote:
The same server certificate is presented by both sites and the CN does not
match any of the FQDN. Therefore you get a security warning on both URLs.
That's what's wrong.
Ok. Up to now I thought the warning is not importent for my purposes...
I am actually a little curious about that.
Is there actually a major Certificate Provider out there that will actually
accept to deliver a certificate for a wildcard domain??
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Nick Burch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 5:56 PM
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 16:46 +, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 09:28:24AM -0700, Brian Kosick wrote:
> ...
> > make[4]: Entering directory
> > `/var/build/edg-bali/Build/edg/edg-build/httpd.2.2.0/src/httpd-2.2.0/support'
> > /var/build/edg-bali/Build/edg/edg-build/httpd.2.2.0/src/htt
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV wrote:
In your case you have the same certificate specified in both VHs, but
since that certificate does not match the ServerName nor the ServerAlias
of any of the VHs, you will always get a security warning no matter
what.
The only way around this
How can I possibly have lived for so long without knowing about that web site?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 5:37 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] More than one name-based vhost with SSL
Yes, but as you could see from my code sample, there are no redirects.
There is a proxypass preceded by a rewrite rule. That is why I feel
that the interaction between mod_proxy_ajp and mod_rewrite is buggy --
as far as I can tell, the behavior I'm getting is not due to an improper
configurat
Sorry about that.
It will be served by the correct VH, but the certificate presented to the
client will always be the one from the first VH.
In your case you have the same certificate specified in both VHs, but since
that certificate does not match the ServerName nor the ServerAlias of any of
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 09:28:24AM -0700, Brian Kosick wrote:
...
> make[4]: Entering directory
> `/var/build/edg-bali/Build/edg/edg-build/httpd.2.2.0/src/httpd-2.2.0/support'
> /var/build/edg-bali/Build/edg/edg-build/httpd.2.2.0/src/httpd-2.2.0/srclib/apr/libtool
> --silent --mode=link gcc -g -O2
In your conf below, you use the same certificate in both VH although the
ServerName are different.
All requests will be handled by the grundfunk VH regardless of whether you
request grundfunk.de or ronalter.de.
If you add
CustomLog /etc/apache2/log/grundfunk_access_log combined
to the grund
Is this any good?
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/apache/2005/02/17/apacheckbk.html
Keith
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Steffen Ronalter wrote:
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> From: Steffen Ronalter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] More than one name-based vhost with SSL
>
> Hi!
>
> First
The same server certificate is presented by both sites and the CN does not
match any of the FQDN. Therefore you get a security warning on both URLs.
That's what's wrong.
The requests will always be served by the first (default) NVH which IP
address/port matches the VirtualHost definition regard
Thank you Gary for the info. I will look into that.
Much appreciated.
Kenny
At 08:31 AM 1/4/2006 -0800, you wrote:
You can try running it on an alternate port side by side and do your
testing that way, assuming that you active site uses relative URLs.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken
You can try running it on an alternate port side by side and do your
testing that way, assuming that you active site uses relative URLs.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Murach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 8:18 AM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [EM
Hi!
First: I've read the docs and now I know that it can't work.
But my setup seems to work: check it out!
https://ronalter.de
https://grundfunk.de
both are on the same machine with only one IP address.
What's the fault in my thought?
My config:
-
Hi All,
I am having issues building apache 2.2.0 with the
--enable-static-support configure flag, if I leave it out, it compiles
just fine. 2.0.54, and 55 work fine with the --enable-static-support
flag. Here's my configure flags, and my errors.
RHEL 3
OpenSSL 0.9.8
./configure
--prefix=/v
Hi everyone,
I'm relatively new at apache/php and I've just installed/built apache
1.3.33 with php-4.4.0 as static. The build was successful and I've run the
following commands:
itis-appdev # pwd
/usr/local/apache_1.3.33_ssl/bin
itis-appdev # ./httpd -t
Syntax OK
itis-appdev # ./httpd -l
Co
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 1/4/2006 at 3:31 PM Muhammad Rizwan wrote:
>Hello
>
>Few things i want to ask about Apache (Linux).
>
>1- How we can enable front page extension
http://www.rtr.com/fpsupport/download.htm
First you need to go to this web site and dnload the "extension
Hi All,
First the question:
Does Apache, when set as a proxy, keeps the session/cookie details of the
sites visited?
The problem:
I would like to build an application that centralize a searching operation
for many search engines. some of which may require a login process.
When returning the searc
Hello,
I found this:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37217
In this bug report it mentions something about upgrading the apr module.
My question is:
apr 0.9.7 "comes" with httpd 2.0.55. Does this mean the apr that came with
httpd 2.0.55 is broken?
I wonder what the solution
hi
I'm having problems building Apache 2.0.55, or rather starting it.
When i try to run the binary the following error message appears in
error_log:
ld.so.1: /home/aspa/dev-3.4/httpd/httpd: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: open
failed: No such file or directory
This happens on Solaris 8 (SPARC), i
Thanks ASCS!
But I could able to find out the solution myself and for users benefit if require, When there is multiple redirectives or query pages in the applications , there should be multiple Aliases in httpd.conf too.
Thanks
Isha
On 1/4/06, Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV <[EMAIL PROTECT
Hello
Few things i want to ask about Apache (Linux).
1- How we can enable front page extension
2- I have add ScriptAlias in my virtual domain entry, as:
ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ mysite.com/www/cgi-bin/"
Now which type of scripts i can execute in cgi-bin directory.
3- How i can execute ph
The reason why you probably did not get any replies to your previous postings
on this subject is that you do not provide any useful information about the
problem you are experiencing apart from "I have a rev proxy problem", "it used
to work", "Page cannot be displayed" which says nothing about y
i hav installed apachi 2.0.55 and axis 1.5 version
created stubs and skeleton by using wsdl2ws.
completed the steps as per windows user guide.
problem is when deploying the sample application (calculater) naming
cal(web service) .
i hav deployed it manually because culdnt find adminclient.
but i c
I am using reverse proxy to host my webservers. It was working fine for exchanges etc. Recently I tried to add one more server which works based on the queries from the users. The problem is as below
But once you put the query to select some indentities or or trying to view the reports gen
34 matches
Mail list logo
