I have a problem with Apache/2.0.54 on debian. It started few days ago. Apache
started to use all the CPU. It does it in a rather strange way: every ~5 or ~6
minutes one apache processes starts running "full speed" and doesn't stop,
after another ~5 minutes another apache processes start running an
David ,
I suggest u should have the following modules under ur load module ,
mod_proxy
mod_proxy_http
mod_proxy_html
mod_proxy
mod_proxy_headers
And I recommend you to dissable
mod_proxy_connect , I have bad experience on this module while coming to Reverse Proxy SSL at backend,
Also Add fi
My advice would be to contact SBC sales and ask if you can get a static IP
address for your DSL line. There are two reasons for doing this. First, if
they offer static IPs, then you can be assured it will NOT be a 192.x
address (what would be the benefit of having a static 192.x address versus a
the equivalent of auto increment in postgres is to define the column as
type serial (or serial8 if 4B items isn't enough for you)
after that all you need to do to find the last number issued is to issue
the 'currval' command (to get the last value issued in your connecton,
which is usueally wh
I have been reading the series of messages on MySQL versus Postgres. I have
a couple of concerns myself. There is one that is important to me. Am I
being paranoid or is there a good reason to be concerned? Here is my
situation.
I have programmed a database in MySQL 4.x. The database could have abo
Isha, thank you! Comments inline.
> > I am having trouble getting my reverse proxy to > work with SSL.
> RequestHeader set Front-End-Https "On"
That did something... But now I get a 403 error and a message in my
logs (on the
proxy server) saying:
[warn] proxy: No protocol handler was valid for
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 03:05:14AM +0200, Anders Bruun Olsen wrote:
> > > And then nothing more happens. Again this is only with some pictures,
> > > although it seems to have spread - all of a sudden a large number of
> > > picture-files are unable to be transfered via Apache.
> > If I had to gues
I use SMC routers because they are the same price as others and include
built in print servers.
Don't worry about your modem, the router has a Virtual Server setup that
pulls the port 80 traffic through to your internal network.
Go to the link below and check out page 56. It shows how simple it is
--- Tyler Nally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 October 2005 05:30 pm, Michael Avila
> wrote:
>
> > Sooo, I need to find out how to work with the
> worse case scenario - that I
> > receive a dynamic non-routable IP address. How can
> people access my site
> > with a domain name if th
On Tuesday 18 October 2005 05:30 pm, Michael Avila wrote:
> Sooo, I need to find out how to work with the worse case scenario - that I
> receive a dynamic non-routable IP address. How can people access my site
> with a domain name if the dynamic address keeps changing and it is a
> private network
May I suggest no-ip.com , I have used it for 5 years and it works great and
is simple to use. You keep your dynamic IP addressing and the no-ip.com
just tracks your current ip address and reroutes your web traffic to the new
ip as it changes. You can use it for free on a site called
mywebname.no-
This is a little off topic. I asked the question before but I have
additional information about the problem and it may make a difference. I
have been told that the IP address given depends upon location so let it be
known that I am in the Detroit area of Michigan.
Currently I have dialup and use D
Hey, thanks Chuck, I have been looking for something like this for a while, *ab* isn't a very well doumented tool...On 10/14/05, Chuck Amadi Systems Administrator
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hi I have in the past run the ab utility.
The blurb about ab benchmarking tool.For getting a benchmark, you c
Also, in your first "directive", turn off indexes,
that should stop the users from seeing an index. Again, as josh has
said, just make sure that php is parsing the file, and that index.php
is set to be a directory index, (like index.html)On 10/13/05, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/
Greetings all,
My problem is possibly two fold, or it is two seperate problems. I'm
unsure, so I will include as much information as possible.
I've added the following to my httpd.conf file:
=
RewriteLock /usr/local/apache/var/run/rewritemap_locks
RewriteMap ldap_lookup prg:/
On 10/18/05, Eric Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> DAV svn
> SVNParentPath /export/myserver/repos
>
> #Access Policy
> AuthzSVNAccessFile /etc/svn-access-file
>
> #Authentication
> Require valid-user
>
> #How to authenticate
> AuthType Basic
> Auth
Hello-
Sorry if I'm posting this in the wrong location. Didn't know where to file this one under.
I'm having a problem setting up access and authentication using subversion and tortoise.
Client: WinXP, Tortoise 1.1.4
Server: Solaris 9, subversion 1.0.5
Apache 2.0.54
When I use tortoise's
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:00:41 EDT Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I have approved them each time I've rec'd the mod request as well.
Is there a contact for apache.org mailing lists that I should forward
this thread to so they can look into the problem?
--Bret
Bret Martin wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:39:05 EDT Joshua Slive wrote:
> > On 10/18/05, Bret Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Is there any particular reason that 1.3.x releases are not announced on
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Nope. Just people forgetting.
>
> Since I'm not an Ap
Bret Martin wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:49:56 EDT Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > Joshua Slive wrote:
> > > On 10/18/05, Bret Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Is there any particular reason that 1.3.x releases are not announced on
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > Nope. Just people fo
Ah, I've just now received a 1.3.34 announcement, dated
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:50:16 -0400 . I suppose this is not a
coincidence.
Thanks for following up on this! I'll look forward to future 1.3.x
announcements.
--Bret
-
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:49:56 EDT Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Joshua Slive wrote:
> > On 10/18/05, Bret Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Is there any particular reason that 1.3.x releases are not announced on
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Nope. Just people forgetting.
>
> Nope. I sent the anno
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:39:05 EDT Joshua Slive wrote:
> On 10/18/05, Bret Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there any particular reason that 1.3.x releases are not announced on
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Nope. Just people forgetting.
Since I'm not an Apache developer I am in the unfortunate
Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Bret Martin wrote:
> >
> > Some time ago, I subscribed to announce@httpd.apache.org, hoping to be
> > notified of new Apache httpd releases.
> >
> > After not hearing about several 1.3.x releases (like many others, I
> > still primarily use 1.3.x), I looked at that list
Bret Martin wrote:
>
> Some time ago, I subscribed to announce@httpd.apache.org, hoping to be
> notified of new Apache httpd releases.
>
> After not hearing about several 1.3.x releases (like many others, I
> still primarily use 1.3.x), I looked at that list's archives and noticed
> that no 1.3.
I will be out of the office starting 10/18/2005 and will not return until 10/21/2005.
I will respond to your message when I return.
Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> On 10/18/05, Bret Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Some time ago, I subscribed to announce@httpd.apache.org, hoping to be
> > notified of new Apache httpd releases.
> >
> > After not hearing about several 1.3.x releases (like many others, I
> > still primarily use 1.3.
On 10/18/05, Bret Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some time ago, I subscribed to announce@httpd.apache.org, hoping to be
> notified of new Apache httpd releases.
>
> After not hearing about several 1.3.x releases (like many others, I
> still primarily use 1.3.x), I looked at that list's archive
Some time ago, I subscribed to announce@httpd.apache.org, hoping to be
notified of new Apache httpd releases.
After not hearing about several 1.3.x releases (like many others, I
still primarily use 1.3.x), I looked at that list's archives and noticed
that no 1.3.x release has been announced there
On 10/18/05, Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sir, Yesss Sir !
>
> I will also keep in mind that this mailing list is for users to help other
> users.
It wasn't the posting to the mailing list that was wrong, it was the
posting to the bug database without first posting to the
I am trying to install Apache-2.0.54 with mod_ssl, mod_ldap, and mod_auth_ldap
with no success with the mod_auth_ldap
piece. My configure runs find, but I can't get apache to make. This is my
configure statement:
# CPPFLAGS="-I/opt/openldap-2.0.25/include"
CPPFLAGS="-I/opt/openssl-0.9.8/include
Sir, Yesss Sir !
I will also keep in mind that this mailing list is for users to help other
users.
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Slive [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 3:16 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Really slow responses fro
Dmitriy,
No apparent problem with the certificate:
openssl s_client -connect ldap2.itcs.northwestern.edu:636 -verify 10 -CAfile
verisign-bundleca.crt -showcerts https://www.verisign.com/rpa (c)00/CN=VeriSign Time Stamping Authority CA
/C=US/ST=Illinois/L=Evanston/O=Northwestern University/OU=Inf
Apache HTTP Server 1.3.34 Released
The Apache Software Foundation and The Apache HTTP Server Project
are
pleased to announce the release of version 1.3.34 of the Apache HTTP
Server ("Apache"). This Announcement notes the significant changes
in 1.3.34 as compare
Have you tried XAMPP (http://www.apachefriends.org/en/index.html)? Integration of Apache and many other
open source tools, such as PHP and MySQL.
Gary T. SchultzSystems and Web AdministratorWisconsin
Department of Commerce
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent
On 10/18/05, Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, folks
>
> I am currently experiencing a really awkward problem with our production
> systems for which I have filed
> http://issues.eu.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37118.
>
Please do not file bug reports and post the
On 10/18/05, Sri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am migrating apache 1.3 t0 2.0 .I need a documentation how to configure
> name based virtual hosts and ipbased virtual hosts.
>
> Which files i need to edit and configure this
As far as I know, there has been no substantial change in virtual
Hello, folks
I am currently experiencing a really awkward problem with our production
systems for which I have filed
http://issues.eu.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37118.
The connection to the server is normal whereupon the server reads the request
and starts processing it. Since we do n
38 matches
Mail list logo
