[EMAIL PROTECTED] ErrorDocumet segfault w/ php

2005-09-08 Thread Jason Morehouse
Hello all, Have run into a strange problem. We have a custom ErrorDocument that points to a php file. This worked fine up till the past little while. Noq it just segfaults. httpd.conf has: ErrorDocument 404 /404.php vhost error_log: [Thu Sep 08 21:14:03 2005] [error] [client 24.100.23.23]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DirectoryIndex /mybin/myindex.cgi

2005-09-08 Thread Andrew Clarke
On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 11:51, Joshua Slive wrote: > > Just remove the suid bit from the suexec binary (or rename it) and > then restart apache. Will do. Now I need to find it looking, ok there it is. Problem solved. Now, it looks like the script has /srv/www/cgi-bin as it's cwd. They are not m

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DirectoryIndex /mybin/myindex.cgi

2005-09-08 Thread Joshua Slive
On 9/8/05, Andrew Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 22:58, Joshua Slive wrote: > > > > Interesting. I haven't looked into it in detail, but I suspect that > > what you are trying to do is not possible with suexec activated. If > > the request is run through mod_userdir, then

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0 hangs in apr_poll() when processing many requests

2005-09-08 Thread sdudley
Hi all, We're having a problem with our Apache processes getting stuck inside an apr_poll() call. This is happening on a production box and it only seems to make itself a problem when the load gets up to > ~10 requests per second. We're using Apache 2.0.46 (RedHat patch, prefork version) in conj

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] does IndexOptions allow display XML format ?

2005-09-08 Thread Joshua Slive
On 9/8/05, Giao L. Trinh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi all, > Apache 2 allows us list Directory with XHTML, how's about XML? > i want apache list my directory with user-defined XML format, is it > posible ? if not, are there any web servers support this, or have any > apache mods ? Not that I kn

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DirectoryIndex /mybin/myindex.cgi

2005-09-08 Thread Andrew Clarke
On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 22:58, Joshua Slive wrote: > > Interesting. I haven't looked into it in detail, but I suspect that > what you are trying to do is not possible with suexec activated. If > the request is run through mod_userdir, then it must follow the > user-specific suexec rules. That includ

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Proper configuration of FollowSymLinks in 2.0.54

2005-09-08 Thread Dukkefup Mun
Hmm.  Are you playing with a precompiled binary or compiling from source?  It's odd that +FollowSymLinks wouldn't be working for you.  Also, what OS are you running Apache under? and also is it running under a non-prived user?   ~~John Aldrich From: Forrest Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Reply-To: us

[EMAIL PROTECTED] does IndexOptions allow display XML format ?

2005-09-08 Thread Giao L. Trinh
hi all, Apache 2 allows us list Directory with XHTML, how's about XML? i want apache list my directory with user-defined XML format, is it posible ? if not, are there any web servers support this, or have any apache mods ? thanks for all replies. cheers, Giao L. Trinh begin:vcard fn:Giao L. Tr

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Proper configuration of FollowSymLinks in 2.0.54

2005-09-08 Thread Joshua Slive
On 9/8/05, Forrest Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is the proper way to configure FollowSymLinks in 2.0.54? > > I'm having a problem getting this to work at all - after reading the > manual, searching for examples, it seems fairly straightforward; however, > every combination I try fa

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Proper configuration of FollowSymLinks in 2.0.54

2005-09-08 Thread Forrest Aldrich
Thanks for your reply. I changed this from "Options All" to "Options +FollowSymLinks" and I still get the same error. I'm using a fairly stripped-down httpd.conf for this, too. Thanks. Dukkefup Mun wrote: Using "Options All" under 2.054 does not give you everything explicitly.  You

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Proper configuration of FollowSymLinks in 2.0.54

2005-09-08 Thread Vizion
On Thursday 08 September 2005 15:09, the author Dukkefup Mun contributed to the dialogue on- RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Proper configuration of FollowSymLinks in 2.0.54: >Using "Options All" under 2.054 does not give you everything explicitly.  > You need to define +FollowSymLinks in order to be ab

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Proper configuration of FollowSymLinks in 2.0.54

2005-09-08 Thread Dukkefup Mun
Using "Options All" under 2.054 does not give you everything explicitly.  You need to define +FollowSymLinks in order to be able to traverse SymLinks.  Same as if you want to explicitly allow CGI with +ExecCGI.  That should work for you.   ~~John Aldrich From: Forrest Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>R

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Proper configuration of FollowSymLinks in 2.0.54

2005-09-08 Thread Forrest Aldrich
What is the proper way to configure FollowSymLinks in 2.0.54? I'm having a problem getting this to work at all - after reading the manual, searching for examples, it seems fairly straightforward; however, every combination I try fails with: Symbolic link not allowed. I am suspicious that I've

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun+Apache+OpenSSL+LDAP+LDAPSSL

2005-09-08 Thread Craig L. Ching
Hi all, This is a follow up on my previous post about getting Apache mod_auth_ldap to work with Novell e-directory. I'm trying to build apache with ldaps:// support. I'm using the following versions: OpenLDAP 2.2.28 OpenSSL 0.9.7f Apache 2.0.54 This is all on SunOS 5.8. When I run configure I

[EMAIL PROTECTED] installation trouble, localhost loads, but other install web apps fail to load on apache2 2.0.54-4 or apache 1.3.33-6

2005-09-08 Thread Dr. Scott S. Jones
I currently have apache2, apache-ssl installed on my Debian 3.1 system, which I recently installed to a new SATA hard drive in my system. The system contains Debian 3.0 installed on an older drive. I had apache 1.3 running on that system, serving up pages for SugarCRM, as well as for Mailman for se

Re: [cli-users] Re: path must be root-ed error

2005-09-08 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
They must be two distinct AspNetMount directives, and two Alias directives. Try reversing the order of the AspNetMount directives. marius popa wrote: On 9/8/05, marius popa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have 2 vb.net applications (moved from an iis server) and first application worked (mounted

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Writing Apache modules in Python

2005-09-08 Thread Nick Kew
On Thursday 08 September 2005 14:52, Devraj Mukherjee wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I am a newbie to mod_python (I have programmed in Python before) and > having trouble understanding if using mod_python or one of the related > projectes (such as mod_snake which seems to be dea) I can actually develop

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Writing Apache modules in Python

2005-09-08 Thread Craig Dunigan
Have you tried the mod_python manual? http://www.modpython.org/live/current/doc-html/ In particular, you probably want the section titled "Python API." -- Craig Dunigan IS Technical Services Specialist Middleware - EIS - DoIT University of Wisconsin, Madison opinions expressed are my own, not

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Writing Apache modules in Python

2005-09-08 Thread Devraj Mukherjee
Hi everyone, I am a newbie to mod_python (I have programmed in Python before) and having trouble understanding if using mod_python or one of the related projectes (such as mod_snake which seems to be dea) I can actually develop Apache modules in Python. I have been tossing the option of writing m

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DirectoryIndex /mybin/myindex.cgi

2005-09-08 Thread Joshua Slive
On 9/8/05, Andrew Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > AllowOverride FileInfo AuthConfig Limit Indexes > Options MultiViews Indexes SymLinksIfOwnerMatch Includes ExecCGI > DirectoryIndex /cgi/myindex.cgi > > When it was installed in /srv/www/htdocs/cgi, and invoked as > ht

[EMAIL PROTECTED] DirectoryIndex /mybin/myindex.cgi

2005-09-08 Thread Andrew Clarke
Hi Folks, I'm going around in ever-tightening circles trying to get DirectoryIndex /mybin/myindex.cgi directive to work against a directory within UserDir (ie ~user/public_html). The platform is SuSE 9.3 with the default installation of Apache 2.0.53. For the record, the config files are

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Apache 2.0.54 unable to read long POST requests

2005-09-08 Thread Tuomas J Rinta
Nick Kew writes: That suggests the request headers exceeded a hard limit in the server (and very possibly that it was a malformed request). The size of the request is irrelevant UNLESS something is broken, like the headers never being terminated. Setting your loglevel to debug or sniffing th

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Apache 2.0.54 unable to read long POST requests

2005-09-08 Thread Tuomas J Rinta
Nick Kew writes: That suggests the request headers exceeded a hard limit in the server (and very possibly that it was a malformed request). The size of the request is irrelevant UNLESS something is broken, like the headers never being terminated. Setting your loglevel to debug or sniffing the

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Segmentation Fault

2005-09-08 Thread Khaled Hussein
Hi Boyle... Thanks a lot for your help, it is working fine now Regards ** Khaled J. Hussein System Administrator Palnet Communications Ltd. http://www.palnet.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel.02/2403434. Fax.02/2403430 **

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.54 unable to read long POST requests

2005-09-08 Thread Nick Kew
On Thursday 08 September 2005 06:59, Tuomas J Rinta wrote: > The error message that is generated in the error_log is: > [Tue Sep 06 22:01:42 2005] [error] [client ] request failed: error > reading the headers, referer: http://vuodatus.net/site/control/editblog That suggests the request headers ex