RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0 and OpenSSL

2005-07-20 Thread Boyle Owen
> -Original Message- > From: Tom Ray [Lists] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Mittwoch, 20. Juli 2005 22:53 > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0 and OpenSSL > > > I'm running apache 2.0 on a suse 9.1 box and I'm trying to > get openSSL > to run with it.

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] browser behaviour - not clear

2005-07-20 Thread Boyle Owen
> -Original Message- > From: MEENA SELVAM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Donnerstag, 21. Juli 2005 07:10 > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] browser behaviour - not clear > > > I have a situation, where request to any uri is > redirected to a fixed ip. the redirec

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.54 and SSLaccelerator card

2005-07-20 Thread Horthik
hi, please help me to find a solution, I am using apache 2.0.54 and a sslaccelerator card, when i compile it with mod_ssl support, there is no directive "SSLCryptoDevice" in ssl.conf. If i add manually in ssl.conf it is saying "Invalid command 'SSLCryptoDevice', perhaps mis-spelled or defi

[EMAIL PROTECTED] browser behaviour - not clear

2005-07-20 Thread MEENA SELVAM
I have a situation, where request to any uri is redirected to a fixed ip. the redirection is done at dns level. the browser gets back the redirected uri / ip as part of the dns response (custom dns server is designed to do this. If this is the case, the browser will send a http-request to the new

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ProxyPass + NoProxy?

2005-07-20 Thread Jason Morehouse
Greetings, I'm trying to setup a transparent proxy to a remote host with ProxyPass. ProxyPass / http://myserver.com This works great, but I also want to bypass the remote proxy based on host. >From my interpretation of the documentation, it appears NoProxy should do the trick but it doesn'

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Strange connection

2005-07-20 Thread kalin mintchev
> Doing a netstat on my server, I find a strange connection. > > It's a crond-job with Apache as owner, and it seems to go to an > irc-server, called 193.110.95.1:ircd, "carouge.ch.eu.undernet.org", anyone > that knows what this is?? if you are running awstats or have phpBBs look at /var/tmp /tm

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing a "slim" 1.3?

2005-07-20 Thread Nick Pappas
On 7/20/05, Dan Trainor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When I'm all done, I'll be posting my procedures for the masses, because > this whole thing has been such a pain in the ass. The docs should be > done in about a week. Thanks Dan, I look forward to the report! I'll be trying my hand at compili

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0 and OpenSSL

2005-07-20 Thread Tom Ray [Lists]
I'm running apache 2.0 on a suse 9.1 box and I'm trying to get openSSL to run with it. Now when I do a ps -ef I see that SSL is running with apache wwwrun 24131 2115 4 16:45 ?00:00:15 /usr/sbin/httpd2-prefork -f /etc/apache2/httpd.conf -Dssl wwwrun 24157 2115 3 16:45 ?00

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing a "slim" 1.3?

2005-07-20 Thread Dan Trainor
Nick Pappas wrote: > Hello all. > > Can anyone direct me to a good resource to trimming down Apache 1.3 to > be as small as possible for my needs? I'd like to disable as much of > the server as possible both to reduce the footprint of the server and > to avoid potential linking errors in compilin

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing a "slim" 1.3?

2005-07-20 Thread Nick Pappas
Hello all. Can anyone direct me to a good resource to trimming down Apache 1.3 to be as small as possible for my needs? I'd like to disable as much of the server as possible both to reduce the footprint of the server and to avoid potential linking errors in compiling on a very minimal Linux insta

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] suexec with mod_chroot: "command not in docroot "

2005-07-20 Thread dAniel hAhler
Hi, Thanks for all your help, it was a very stupid mistake of myself.. "/fcgi-scripts/.." still was not in the docroot, because the suexec2 in the chroot was still the old one... :/ I thought I had hardlinked it there, but it seems to have been copied only. Sorry.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] suexec with mod_chroot: "command not in docroot "

2005-07-20 Thread dAniel hAhler
On Wednesday 20 July 2005 17:12, Gold, Samuel (Contractor) wrote: > Cwd is current working directory, it is an environment variable. At least > from what I understand. I am not sure what dwd is though. Have you tried > to use truss or strace to see if you are missing a command in your chrooted

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Authenticating All Requests Via A Subdomain Using Mod_Rewrite

2005-07-20 Thread Joshua Slive
On 7/20/05, Dukkefup Mun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > T want to configure my domain www.constructingreality.com to forward all > incoming requests to a subdomain called > checkpoint.constructingreality.com. On this subdomain I am > performing various security checks (is the users ip banned? Is th

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Authenticating All Requests Via A Subdomain Using Mod_Rewrite

2005-07-20 Thread Dukkefup Mun
I am configuring a security sub system for my website on Apache 2.0.46 / Red Hat Linux.  I will attempt to provide as much information as possible about this so that with some assistance from you wonderful people I can arrive at a solution that will atleast leave me with some hair :-) I have google

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: [suppress all HEADER in apache response ???]

2005-07-20 Thread Joshua Slive
On 7/20/05, Burkhard Herre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hello > > i implement a system without a brwoser as client. > a software in C# calls the skript on the server over http and the skript > sends same information back. > > but only 10 bytes or something like that (binary data). > > and i have

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: [suppress all HEADER in apache response ???]

2005-07-20 Thread Burkhard Herre
hello i implement a system without a brwoser as client. a software in C# calls the skript on the server over http and the skript sends same information back. but only 10 bytes or something like that (binary data). and i have a minimal bandwidth and a very slow connection. and so i want to red

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redirect/Rewrite question

2005-07-20 Thread Joshua Slive
On 7/20/05, James Sherwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Scenario: > > I have an apache server on a global ip and one behind a firewall attached to > tomcat via mod_jk. I would like to redirect or rewrite from the global > apache to the one behind the firewall. > > What I have done: >

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] suexec with mod_chroot: "command not in docroot"

2005-07-20 Thread Joshua Slive
On 7/20/05, dAniel hAhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Joshua Slive wrote: > > > > I've installed mod_chroot for Apache (2.0.53-Ubuntu), but have now > > > problems > > > with suexec complaining: > > > > > > [2005-07-20 06:28:13]: uid: (1003/x) gid: (1003/1003) cmd: > > > php4-fcgi-starter >

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Redirect/Rewrite question

2005-07-20 Thread James Sherwood
Scenario:   I have an apache server on a global ip and one behind a firewall attached to tomcat via mod_jk.  I would like to redirect or rewrite from the global apache to the one behind the firewall.   What I have done: I am trying to do a rewrite and it is working somewhat.  This is what I

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Httpd processes exist for more than two days

2005-07-20 Thread Joshua Slive
On 7/20/05, Mishra, Pawan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am using I.H.S. 1.3.26.2 with Websphere and have frequently noticed that > there are many httpd processes older than two days. This happens even if > application is not heavily used in the mean time. > > Can someone help me out to know what

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [suppress all HEADER in apache response ???]

2005-07-20 Thread Joshua Slive
On 7/20/05, Burkhard Herre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hello > > i want to sent all responses of my apache/php without all headers. > > is there a chance to supress or delete the different header info before > sending the answer to the client ? or only send the absolutely needed > headers ? > >

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Allow from - requiring both a http header and an IP range

2005-07-20 Thread Joshua Slive
On 7/20/05, Dieter Vrancken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > This issue seems very simple at first, but I can't figure out > how to make it work. I'm using Apache 1.3.33 on Debian sarge. > > I want to allow access to a directory based on the following > conditions: > - user comes from IP

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] suexec with mod_chroot: "command not in docroot "

2005-07-20 Thread Gold, Samuel (Contractor)
Cwd is current working directory, it is an environment variable. At least from what I understand. I am not sure what dwd is though. Have you tried to use truss or strace to see if you are missing a command in your chrooted environment? What OS are you using? -Original Message- From: dA

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod xslt installation

2005-07-20 Thread Peter Sykora
Correction! modxslt version 1.3.8 instead of mod_xslt 2.0.4 Sorry > Hi, > I try to install the mod_xslt module (version 2.0.4) using Apache/2.0.49 > under Suse Linux 9.1. > I followed the installation instructions but when running configure I > get the following error message: > > checking for

[users@httpd] Httpd processes exist for more than two days

2005-07-20 Thread Mishra, Pawan
Title: Httpd processes exist for more than two days Hi, I am using I.H.S. 1.3.26.2 with Websphere and have frequently noticed that there are many httpd processes older than two days. This happens even if application is not heavily used in the mean time. Can someone help me out to know wha

[EMAIL PROTECTED] [suppress all HEADER in apache response ???]

2005-07-20 Thread Burkhard Herre
hello i want to sent all responses of my apache/php without all headers. is there a chance to supress or delete the different header info before sending the answer to the client ? or only send the absolutely needed headers ? edit the httpd.conf or php.ini ??? or same work in my php scripts

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] suexec with mod_chroot: "command not in docroot"

2005-07-20 Thread dAniel hAhler
Joshua Slive wrote: > > I've installed mod_chroot for Apache (2.0.53-Ubuntu), but have now problems > > with suexec complaining: > > > > [2005-07-20 06:28:13]: uid: (1003/x) gid: (1003/1003) cmd: > > php4-fcgi-starter > > [2005-07-20 06:28:13]: command not in docroot > > (/fcgi-scripts/web2/ph

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Allow from - requiring both a http header and an IP range

2005-07-20 Thread Dieter Vrancken
Hi all, This issue seems very simple at first, but I can't figure out how to make it work. I'm using Apache 1.3.33 on Debian sarge. I want to allow access to a directory based on the following conditions: - user comes from IP range A or - user comes from IP range B or - user comes from IP range C

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Proxying basic authentication

2005-07-20 Thread Joshua Slive
On 7/19/05, Anthony Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can anyone tell me how to proxy authentication requests? The problem I'm > having is that I serve a LAN from a disk drive and forward (proxy) any > requests for content on remote servers. I cache the content that returns. > The problem is that

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2.0] Better way to control TRACE and TRACK

2005-07-20 Thread Joshua Slive
On 7/20/05, Karasulu, Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In Apache 1.3 TraceEnable off was a valid option but it does not seem to > be carried into 2.0? TraceEnable was added only very recently to 1.3 and in fact is not in any released version. Although it can be used to disable TRACE, its main pu

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_xslt installation

2005-07-20 Thread Peter Sykora
Hi, I try to install the mod_xslt module (version 2.0.4) using Apache/2.0.49 under Suse Linux 9.1. I followed the installation instructions but when running configure I get the following error message: checking for apr_brigade_create in -laprutil-0... no configure: error: apache2: 'aprutil-0'

[EMAIL PROTECTED] [2.0] Better way to control TRACE and TRACK

2005-07-20 Thread Karasulu, Alex
Hi, In Apache 1.3 TraceEnable off was a valid option but it does not seem to be carried into 2.0? The only option available is a rewrite which has to go into 100's of our virtual host files and this means: 1. Allot of work 2. Dealing with mod rewrite Here's what we do today to get around no

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] suexec with mod_chroot: "command not in docroot"

2005-07-20 Thread Joshua Slive
On 7/20/05, dAniel hAhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I've installed mod_chroot for Apache (2.0.53-Ubuntu), but have now problems > with suexec complaining: > > [2005-07-20 06:28:13]: uid: (1003/x) gid: (1003/1003) cmd: > php4-fcgi-starter > [2005-07-20 06:28:13]: command not in docr

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: virtual hosts

2005-07-20 Thread Joost de Heer
> NameVirtualHost *:80 > > Joost - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " fro

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Module development

2005-07-20 Thread Joost de Heer
Joshua Slive said: > On 7/18/05, Devraj Mukherjee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Are there any resources for module development with Apache? > > Other than http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/developer/ > and http://modules.apache.org/subscribe ? IIRC, there's some material in Apache, the definitive g

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache-1.3.33 & php-4.2.2-17.rpm

2005-07-20 Thread Davide Bianchi
Bahya NASSR EDDINE wrote: > I receive an "internal error: Segmentation fault" > message while compiling php, I think that this is due > to memory. Then your memory is bugged and you should replace it immediately. Davide - The of

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache-1.3.33 & php-4.2.2-17.rpm

2005-07-20 Thread Bahya NASSR EDDINE
Thank you for your response. --- Davide Bianchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > "unable to compile" means? Maybe you miss something > in your installation. I receive an "internal error: Segmentation fault" message while compiling php, I think that this is due to memory. > It sounds like the versi

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache-1.3.33 & php-4.2.2-17.rpm

2005-07-20 Thread Davide Bianchi
Bahya NASSR EDDINE wrote: > I compiled apache-1.3.33 whith mod_ssl. Since I was > unable to compile php "unable to compile" means? Maybe you miss something in your installation. > Any idea please? It sounds like the version of PHP you installed isn't made for that version of Apache or you miss s

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apache-1.3.33 & php-4.2.2-17.rpm

2005-07-20 Thread Bahya NASSR EDDINE
Hi all, I compiled apache-1.3.33 whith mod_ssl. Since I was unable to compile php, I installed php-4.2.2-17.i386.rpm. I created a php file (test.php) in the htdocs directory. But once I tryed to access it from the browser, I received the error essage: "The file "test.php" is of type applicati

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache for win64

2005-07-20 Thread Gopikrishnan Sidhardhan
Hi, Does anybody know if there is an Apache binary installer for Win64 somewhere? If not, does the win32 source work for win64 as well out of the box? Thanks, --Gopi - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache H

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting options for Apache 2.0.54 Win32 build

2005-07-20 Thread Robert Swarbrick
Hello all, I'm trying to work out how to set the equivalent of 'configure' options (e.g. --with-ldap) whilst building Apache from source **on Win32**. I've read enough of the docs to build Apache 2.0.54, include OpenSSL 0.9.7g, run the server and connect to pages over https, but to date trying

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] virtual hosts

2005-07-20 Thread Gerald Griessner
I recompiled it several times, ... always did a make distclean before compiling, ... I tried different ./compile options as well as older versions of apache, ... --On Wednesday, July 20, 2005 08:37:15 AM +0200 Davide Bianchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Gerald Griessner wrote: Segmentatio