RE: [users@httpd] RewriteRule question: forward requests from one Apache server to another

2005-06-27 Thread Boyle Owen
> -Original Message- > From: Cameron Beattie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Dienstag, 28. Juni 2005 04:50 > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RewriteRule question: forward requests from one > Apache server to another > > > I am trying to set up the following confi

RE: FW: [users@httpd] Apache dies unexpectedly

2005-06-27 Thread Boyle Owen
Let's recap: You have a private webserver connected only to a LAN which goes through repeated restart cycles. No cronjobs or daemons or other users appear to be responsible. How are you starting apache? Is it, by any chance, started as an internet service (via /etc/inetd.conf)? If so, inetd cou

RE: [users@httpd] Compile apache 2.0.54

2005-06-27 Thread Boyle Owen
> -Original Message- > From: Trung Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Montag, 27. Juni 2005 23:52 > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compile apache 2.0.54 > > > Hello, > > Is there a way to compile/configure apache 2.0.54 with > modifications to the configur

Re: [users@httpd] Apache2 hangs w/o responding on FBSD 5.4

2005-06-27 Thread Artem Kuchin
Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/27/05, Artem Kuchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi! I have a very bad problem. We are running about 20 jails on freebsd. Each has one apache (2.0.54) and one jails has about 80 httpds each running from its own user (non root startup). Php5 module is c

[users@httpd] RewriteRule question: forward requests from one Apache server to another

2005-06-27 Thread Cameron Beattie
I am trying to set up the following configuration: 1. Apache server with public IP address 2. Apache server behind NAT with no public IP address 3. Router with public IP address with port forwarding set up for port 8008 to Apache server 2 4. Public DNS record server.mydomain.com resolves to IP a

Re: FW: [users@httpd] Apache dies unexpectedly

2005-06-27 Thread AussieJohn
On 6/27/05, AussieJohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/27/05, Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: AussieJohn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Montag, 27. Juni 2005 13:29 > > > > > > > > Could it be a CGI program? Does apache start as roo

Re: [users@httpd] Compile apache 2.0.54

2005-06-27 Thread Aman Raheja
the advantage of open source is that you can do what you want, or otherwise the directives in the core module are always available and others you can enable/disable at compile time. read through the configure file and the apache docs to see what you want to disable. - Aman Raheja http://www.tec

[users@httpd] Compile apache 2.0.54

2005-06-27 Thread Trung Nguyen
Hello, Is there a way to compile/configure apache 2.0.54 with modifications to the configuration file that disables methods such as OPTIONS, TRACE, PUT, DELETE, etc. Thanks, Trung - The official User-To-User support forum of

[users@httpd] Suexec invocation problem

2005-06-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello all, Suexec is driving me crazy! Apache 1.3.33 compiled with the suexec related options --enable-suexec \ --suexec-uidmin=100 \ --suexec-gidmin=100 \ --suexec-caller=nobody \ --suexec-docroot=/usr/local/apache/vdoc

Re: [users@httpd] Apache2 hangs w/o responding on FBSD 5.4

2005-06-27 Thread Joshua Slive
On 6/27/05, Artem Kuchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > I have a very bad problem. We are running about 20 jails > on freebsd. Each has one apache (2.0.54) and one jails > has about 80 httpds each running from its own user (non > root startup). Php5 module is compiled in. Everything else > i

Re: [users@httpd] Apache2 hangs w/o responding on FBSD 5.4

2005-06-27 Thread Artem Kuchin
Craig Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Artem, I think I have the same thing happening on Windows with 2.0.53. I have no idea what's causing the problem. Just out of curiousity... 1) Have you looked in your error log at the time just before it hangs? yes, nothing's there. empty log. 2) A

Re: [users@httpd] Apache2 hangs w/o responding on FBSD 5.4

2005-06-27 Thread Craig Harris
Artem, I think I have the same thing happening on Windows with 2.0.53. I have no idea what's causing the problem. Just out of curiousity... 1) Have you looked in your error log at the time just before it hangs? 2) Are you running any firewall software? If so, have you tried to disable it to see

[users@httpd] Apache2 hangs w/o responding on FBSD 5.4

2005-06-27 Thread Artem Kuchin
Hi! I have a very bad problem. We are running about 20 jails on freebsd. Each has one apache (2.0.54) and one jails has about 80 httpds each running from its own user (non root startup). Php5 module is compiled in. Everything else is the same as after installtion from the FreeBSD ports (source bu

Re: [users@httpd] mod_rewrite url decoding and '?'

2005-06-27 Thread Noah
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 06:45:37PM +0200, Ian Beselin wrote: > The files I want to deliver using Apache 1.3.33 contain question marks, > e.g. > .../htdocs/fund?a12.html > To request this file I can use the URL > http://www.funds.com/fund%3fa12.html Does this help: http://marc.theaimsgro

[users@httpd] mod_rewrite url decoding and '?'

2005-06-27 Thread Ian Beselin
The files I want to deliver using Apache 1.3.33 contain question marks, e.g. .../htdocs/fund?a12.html To request this file I can use the URL http://www.funds.com/fund%3fa12.html That is no problem. However if I want to use a rewrite rule to get to the same file I have a problem. For exa

[users@httpd] converting to SSL

2005-06-27 Thread Hugh Williams
Hi; I have an existing Apache 1.3.33 installation. I need to introduce SSL capability to the server, and so have installed 2.0.54 with mod_ssl on the same system. After much tinkering with SSL configuration (I think I understand it much better now!), I have both servers up and running. My quest

Re: [users@httpd] 2 Gig Apache File Size Limit...

2005-06-27 Thread Charles Heizer
Thanks ... Not the answer I was looking for :-) ... Thanks again, - Charles On 6/24/05 6:43 PM, "Jignesh Badani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I believe it is the current version (2.0x) limitation > > You may want to check this out: > > http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.1/new_features_2_2.html >

[users@httpd] Problem report: ldap / apache 2.0.54: child process crashes after failed authentication

2005-06-27 Thread GOVAERTS Lieven
Hi, We encounter a problem with an apache server in our system, when failing authentication with an Active Directory server. Environment: Suse linux ( kernel: vmlinuz-2.6.5-7.97-bigsmp ) apache 2.0.54, one patch applied ( attached ) openldap2-2.2.6-37.rpm ( integrated with subversion 1.2.0 ) in

Re: [users@httpd] Samba share related 404's

2005-06-27 Thread Jonathan Mangin
- Original Message - From: "Marty Landman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 6:45 AM Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Samba share related 404's At 09:45 PM 6/24/2005, "Boyle Owen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been getting errors like these for a long time > > [Fr

Re: FW: [users@httpd] Apache dies unexpectedly

2005-06-27 Thread AussieJohn
On 6/27/05, Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: AussieJohn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Montag, 27. Juni 2005 13:29 > > > > > > Could it be a CGI program? Does apache start as root? > > > > > > - > > it could indeed be a cgi (PHP) program

RE: FW: [users@httpd] Apache dies unexpectedly

2005-06-27 Thread Boyle Owen
> -Original Message- > From: AussieJohn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Montag, 27. Juni 2005 13:29 > > > > Could it be a CGI program? Does apache start as root? > > > > - > it could indeed be a cgi (PHP) program - allthough quite > often I am not > using the webserver, and will

[users@httpd] Samba share related 404's

2005-06-27 Thread Marty Landman
At 09:45 PM 6/24/2005, "Boyle Owen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been getting errors like these for a long time > > [Fri Jun 24 08:23:02 2005] [error] [client 192.168.0.1] File does not > exist: /usr/local/apache/htdocs/look I used to get these and never bothered to track the cause. Me

Re: FW: [users@httpd] Apache dies unexpectedly

2005-06-27 Thread AussieJohn
On 6/27/05, Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Boyle Owen > > Sent: Montag, 27. Juni 2005 13:14 > > To: 'AussieJohn' > > Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache dies unexpectedly > > > > > > Pls keep on list... > > > > > > > > -Original Message- >

FW: [users@httpd] Apache dies unexpectedly

2005-06-27 Thread Boyle Owen
> -Original Message- > From: Boyle Owen > Sent: Montag, 27. Juni 2005 13:14 > To: 'AussieJohn' > Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache dies unexpectedly > > Pls keep on list... > > > > -Original Message- > > From: AussieJohn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Montag, 27. Jun

Re: [users@httpd] Apache dies unexpectedly

2005-06-27 Thread AussieJohn
> > Problem: > > Apache dies unexpected and out of the blue. e.g. I came to work this > > (monday) morning, > > and found my webserver died about half an hour before I even got into > > the office. > > Every so often (seemingly random times...) therewill be entries in the > > error_log saying:

RE: [users@httpd] Compression and Security

2005-06-27 Thread Boyle Owen
> -Original Message- > From: Arthur Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Isn't it possible to compress images any further? No. A raw image from a camera or scanner is a bitmap; an array of pixels each of which contains the colour and brilliance information for that pixel. The filesize is

RE: [users@httpd] Apache dies unexpectedly

2005-06-27 Thread Boyle Owen
> -Original Message- > From: AussieJohn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Montag, 27. Juni 2005 05:47 > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache dies unexpectedly > > > Hey list, > > For the past few days I have been having terrible problems with my > Apache 2 serv

[users@httpd] Re: New exploit in Apache and FC3?

2005-06-27 Thread Joost de Heer
Mailing List Receiver said: > Ever since we found and stopped a phishing site that had been planted > on our server to run as the default site under Apache, we have been under > constant attack. Presumably, the perpretrators did not appreciate that > we made their millions of scam emails ineffecti