Re: [users@httpd] Missing User-Agent:

2005-06-05 Thread Joshua Slive
On 6/5/05, Michael D. Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 6/4/05, Michael D. Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I notice that Apache 2.0 rejects, with a 403, > > > a GET that does not have a User-Agent header, > > > and I to get some of these. > > > > > > Why do I get them? > > > Why are

[users@httpd] Apache2 Suexec FrontPage extensions

2005-06-05 Thread Brian McDonald
Is there anyone out there that has successfully installed the MS FrontPage extensions on a Fedora Core 3 Apache 2.054 system? Are you able to support the FrontPage Extension when using virtual hosts? Where did you find the appropriate patches to Apache2 and Suexec. Brian -- No virus found in this

[users@httpd] Re: Apache cannot connect to Tomcat in httpd.conf

2005-06-05 Thread Andreas
Setup a log for mod_jk2. /usr/local/apache2/logs/error_log: [Thu Jun 02 01:36:24 2005] [notice] Apache/2.0.54 (Unix) configured -- resuming normal operations [Thu Jun 02 02:19:08 2005] [notice] caught SIGTERM, shutting down [Thu Jun 02 02:19:11 2005] [notice] Apache/2.0.54 (Unix) mod_jk2/2

Re: [users@httpd] Forbidden

2005-06-05 Thread Patrick Donker
AE wrote: Greetings Jirka and others, I need to better understand what security implications I may have created with changes made to the httpd.conf file. I appear to have success with my Vhosted Suse box! Can someone explain the changes I made to the Directory and Should I use the .htaccess

Re: [users@httpd] Forbidden

2005-06-05 Thread AE
Greetings Jirka and others, I need to better understand what security implications I may have created with changes made to the httpd.conf file. I appear to have success with my Vhosted Suse box! Can someone explain the changes I made to the Directory and Should I use the .htaccess file instead

RE: [users@httpd] Missing User-Agent:

2005-06-05 Thread Michael D. Berger
> -Original Message- > From: Joshua Slive [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2005 12:03 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Missing User-Agent: > > > On 6/4/05, Michael D. Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I notice that Apache 2.0 rejects,

Re: [users@httpd] Missing User-Agent:

2005-06-05 Thread Joshua Slive
On 6/4/05, Michael D. Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I notice that Apache 2.0 rejects, with a 403, > a GET that does not have a User-Agent header, > and I to get some of these. > > Why do I get them? > Why are they rejected? Apache 2 certainly does not do this by default. There must be some

Re: [users@httpd] X's in HTTP GET

2005-06-05 Thread Joshua Slive
On 6/4/05, Michael D. Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here is an excerpt from a GET packet from IE-6.0-SP-1 on Win2k: > >Accept-Language: en-us\r\n >XXX: X\r\n >User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0)\r\n > > What are all these X's?

Re: [users@httpd] Apache cannot connect to Tomcat in httpd.conf

2005-06-05 Thread Dick Davies
* Andreas Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [0643 13:43]: > Hello! > > Can somebody help me, please? > > My OS is Suse 9.2 pro. Apache and Tomcat work for me. > But If I start Apache with normal httpd.conf, Apache works for me. > If I paste my lines for Apache-Tomcat Connection, Apache doesn't > work for

[users@httpd] Apache cannot connect to Tomcat in httpd.conf

2005-06-05 Thread Andreas Bauer
Hello! Can somebody help me, please? My OS is Suse 9.2 pro. Apache and Tomcat work for me. But If I start Apache with normal httpd.conf, Apache works for me. If I paste my lines for Apache-Tomcat Connection, Apache doesn't work for me, only Tomcat. It must be something wrong with this lin