> Hi,
>
> I am trying to use Apache 2.0 on windows to load balance three tomcat workers
> using mod_jk.
> Wen I browse the URL (http://localhost/jsp-examples/index.jsp), Apache does
> not locate it
> from the tomcat servers, and most probably it does not forward the req
you didn't understand what I was asking...The config I have included is
working ..I have used htpasswd and everything is working fineAll I want
to know is how does apache know that I have already authenticated or not ?
Anand
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Winfield-Blum" <[EMAIL
you will have to use the htpasswd tools located in your apache bin to
create the password file. then you point that directory to that file: ie:
/etc/httpd/conf/passwd/passwords
This should do that you need :)
K Anand said the following:
Hi all,
I have a very basic question regarding authenticatio
1. How do I check for *no* referer field ?
Apache usually prints "-" in the log if the referer is not defined. But it depends on whatever you are using to check the referer in the first place.
Right. You need to tell us the blocking method you are using.
An example is here:
http://httpd.apache.or
Hi all,
I have a very basic question regarding authentication on apache...I have in
my httpd.conf a section like below :
AuthType Basic
AuthName "By Invitaion Only"
AuthUserFile /etc/httpd/conf/passwd/passwords
Require valid-user
AllowOverride None
Options ExecCGI
Ord
I notice your BML.pm is composed of several packages. I see at least
BML::Request and Apache::BML and maybe some others in whatever you've
truncated.
I guess I'd suggest tracking down where exactly your BML.pm file is used
by either some apache configuration file or some mod_perl or cgi
applic
Hi everyone,
My first time sending to this mail list :)
I am setting up user directories but hitting into some problems.
When i try to access on http://domain/~user/
i get:
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /~chris/index.htm on this
I do use DBI.pm to connect to a mysql database in various situations,
however I am not preloading any mysql modules into the apache server nor
does my test CGI make use of mysql in any way. So mysql is not an issue
in my question.
From what I am seeing in Apache 2.0.52, the apache httpd process
On 5/11/05, Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Uri Raz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Mittwoch, 11. Mai 2005 15:05
> > To: users@httpd.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache improvement suggestion
> >
> >
> > Sorry if those question are
You aren't perchance using a MySQL library are you? libmysql clears SIGPIPE
on initialization, so you might need to set your handlers after that. I ran
into that issue a while back Worth a try?
If you're not using MySQL, well, never mind. :)
j- k-
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 10:54, Jim
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 02:01, Uri Raz wrote:
> Problem with that solution is that many surfers block the referrer field
> using a proxy or a firewall, including some surfers who browse my site and
> legitimately expect the graphics to come up. My idea is to have apache
> remember which IP reque
hi...
i hope this is the right place to turn to!!
i have mod_perl installed on an apache1.3.33/mod_perl1.29/FC3 setup.
i'm trying to track down how i can print something from a '.pm' file that's
used with an apache app that i'm testing...
my perl skill is enough to get me in trouble!!
here's t
Is anyone aware of a change in signal handling by apache httpd from
somewhere perhaps between versions 2.0.49 and 2.0.52 of apache?
It seems to me that apache would previously catch a sigpipe once it
noticed that the pipe from server to client was broken; most likely by
someone pressing the sto
Hello Dick,
Thanks for the speedy reply. I am aware that Apache is
not an FTP server. I did notice that Apache provides
an FTP module. I believe this module can be used to
facilitate FTP downloads by the Apache server. Please
correct me if I am wrong in assuming this.
If this is correct, the q
cool thanks. I'm writing this on win32 first and then it will be linux in production (please don't ask why) so it's ok for real life but for testing is there anything similar for win32?
thanks,
"Gold, Samuel (Contractor)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
./apachectl graceful
-Original Messag
Title: Message
./apachectl graceful
-Original Message-From: ed elliott
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005
11:49 AMTo: users@httpd.apache.orgSubject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
adding virtual hosts without restarting ??
Hi,
If I add a virtual host to apa
Hi,
If I add a virtual host to apache, is there any way that I can get it to work without restarting apache?
What do ISP's do when they create a new domain - surely they dont restart apache and cause all the other domains to stop working (for a little while) ??
thanks,
ed
How much free
Hello Axel-Stéphane,
Wednesday, May 11, 2005, 9:17:18 AM, you wrote:
> Have you just upgraded from Apache 2.0.49 or older?
Hi and thanks for you mail. Yes i have upgraded. Now the problem is
solved. There was a wrong entry at the configfile. LockFile was not
defined correctly.
Chris
---
* Bediako George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [0517 13:17]:
> able to try to download from my Apache FTP server
Apache isn't an FTP server. I think you're on the wrong track.
--
'This must be Thursday. I never could get the hang of Thursdays.'
-- Arthur Dent
Rasputin :: Jack of All Trade
> -Original Message-
> From: Uri Raz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 11. Mai 2005 15:05
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache improvement suggestion
>
>
> Sorry if those question are dummy, but -
>
> 1. How do I check for *no* referer field ?
A
Hello All,
I had stored username & password in the .htpassword
file. I am using mod_auth_dbm for authentication. The .htpassword file
contains english as well as japanese username & password. I had done for
english username & password combination. But I am unable to do that for
j
(B
(B
(BHi,
(B
(BI am porting the apache 2.0.53 to Windows 2003
(BServer (64-bit). From the study of the code, I found that at some places, care
(Bis not taken while writing the portable code.
(B
(Blike in file server\mpm\winnt\child.c (line 887):
(B
(Bchild_handles = (HANDLE) apr_
>> I merely stated that this would be expensive on the server side,
>No, you haven't (or you haven't provided any arguments to support this
>claim). You would not be transferring any more data than you already do.
>You would actually be transferring less because you have vastly less TCP
>connecti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You stated "I always thought it would make a lot more sense to
transfer some or all images (and CSS and JS) within the same request
as the containing HTML page."
Yes, and I still think so. You have mentioned situations where it
wouldn't work; so use what we already have i
>>
>> How would dynamic stuff work?
>Uuhh the same way as always?
>> What if your image is on another server farm?
>Uuhh then you use the system we already have?
Who are you talking to?
You stated "I always thought it would make a lot more sense to transfer
some or all images (and CS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been thinking for almost 10 years now that HTTP is really dumb
because it has problems like this one. I always thought it would
make a lot more sense to transfer some or all images (and CSS and
JS) within the same request as the containing HTML page. Then your
problem
>I've been thinking for almost 10 years now that HTTP is really dumb
>because it has problems like this one. I always thought it would make a
>lot more sense to transfer some or all images (and CSS and JS) within
>the same request as the containing HTML page. Then your problem would go
>away b
Hi,
I am trying to use Apache 2.0 on windows to load balance three tomcat workers
using mod_jk.
Wen I browse the URL (http://localhost/jsp-examples/index.jsp), Apache does
not locate it
from the tomcat servers, and most probably it does not forward the request
since I get the following
into th
Your IP solution is more expensive in my opinion. It is expensive to you,
and does little to solve the problem. You are not identifying the client.
You are identifying what your server thinks the client is. BIG difference.
Especially with the oodles of NATing going on in our lovely world.
-O
Uri Raz wrote:
Problem with that solution is that many surfers block the referrer
field using a proxy or a firewall, including some surfers who browse
my site and legitimately expect the graphics to come up.
As Joshua already mentioned, this is not a problem as this is a small
fraction of the user
Hello all,
I really appreciate the hard work you guys have put
into the Apache HTTP server. I have a question
regarding what I would term as "restricted FTP access"
though there may be another term for this.
My problem is that I have files that I want to serve
my customers on a limited basis. T
More (probably too much more) on the subject...
Many browsers, and others (when the user knows a few things) can fake the
refferer, so if it is a serious problem for you, then you 'may' not
benefit from any of this.
I am drawing up a token system to try to handle this, which may be cookie
based.
Sorry if those question are dummy, but -
1. How do I check for *no* referer field ?
2. Are you sure only 5% of the requests will have no referer field,
considering the number of surfers using firewalls ?
3. Why is it you think checking for no referer field is more expensive,
server side, than th
On 5/11/05, Uri Raz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a problem with object theft on my web site - bloggers & forum
> participants link directly to images on my web site, so they get the
> content and I get the traffic bill at the end of the site. The solution
> suggested to me by th
Hello,
I have a problem with object theft on my web site - bloggers & forum
participants link directly to images on my web site, so they get the
content and I get the traffic bill at the end of the site. The solution
suggested to me by the hosting company (which uses apache) is to use an
'.hta
Printing logs is really arb yes... Anyways, you can ignore the requests
with mod_security. It will return a 500 to the client.
--
Chris.
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 09:08:34AM +0200, Axel-St?phane SMORGRAV wrote:
> I am not going to ask why logs are printed in real-time to a dot-matrix
> printer
Have you just upgraded from Apache 2.0.49 or older?
The defaults for SSLMutex and AcceptMutex have changed from pthread to fcntl
somewhere between 2.0.49 and 2.0.52 at least on the Solaris platform. You
probably need to explicitly set the Mutex type you wish to use, and in the case
of fcntl sp
I am not going to ask why logs are printed in real-time to a dot-matrix
printer. Maybe that is next best to sounding an alarm bell?
Apart from using something like "Redirect(Match)? (403|gone) /sumthin" which
you already do, what about directing error logs to a pipe that filters the
entries you
38 matches
Mail list logo
