On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 5:24 AM, aaron morton wrote:
> Not sure how feasible it is or if it's planned. But it would probably
> require that the nodes are able so share the state of their row cache so as
> to know which parts to warm. Otherwise it sounds like you're assuming the
> node can hold the
Not sure how feasible it is or if it's planned. But it would probably require
that the nodes are able so share the state of their row cache so as to know
which parts to warm. Otherwise it sounds like you're assuming the node can hold
the entire data set in memory.
If you know in your applicati
the way i understand how row caches work is that each node has an
independent cache, in that they do not push there cache contents with other
nodes. if that the case is it also true that when a new node is added to
the cluster it has to build up its own cache. if thats the case i see that
as a po
