It tends to do very well for that. Storage and modifications are what is
more expensive..
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Gross, Daniel
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am new to Cassandra.
>
>
>
> I am wondering how well does Cassandra perform in e-commerce applications
> that have large taxonomies for
ack Krupansky [mailto:jack.krupan...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 13, 2016 04:25
> *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: performance question
>
>
>
> Usually one would go with a search engine such as Solr or Elasticsearch
> for an e-commerce product catalog query..
&
this
usually caught. For example, sometimes we see results of searchers and
additional suggestions of subset of criteria to use.
Thanks,
Daniel
From: Jack Krupansky [mailto:jack.krupan...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 04:25
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: performance
Usually one would go with a search engine such as Solr or Elasticsearch for
an e-commerce product catalog query..
Ad-doc and complex queries are generally an antipattern for Cassandra, but
you can use the Stratio plugin to do multi-column Lucene search or DataStax
Enterprise Search to perform full
Hi,
I am new to Cassandra.
I am wondering how well does Cassandra perform in e-commerce applications that
have large taxonomies for products with many user searchable product
attributes; when many concurrent users in fact submit multi criteria searchers
for products:
E.g. Shirt, white, size =
One of the reasons of using reverse order is to skip the tombstones while
doing a range query. Here is an example.
*
Lets say we want to read all the data which is between 10 minutes old upto
60 minute old. If the data is stored from old to new in an sstable, then we
have to go over all the tombst
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Hiller, Dean wrote:
>
> We loaded 5 million columns into a single row and when accessing the
first 30k and last 30k columns we saw no performance difference. We tried
just loading 2 rows from the beginning and end and saw no performance
difference. I am sure rever
We loaded 5 million columns into a single row and when accessing the first 30k
and last 30k columns we saw no performance difference. We tried just loading 2
rows from the beginning and end and saw no performance difference. I am sure
reverse sort is there for a reason though. In what context
ards,
> -Tony
>
> *From:* Jabbar Azam
> *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
> *Cc:* Tony Anecito
> *Sent:* Monday, June 24, 2013 3:26 AM
>
> *Subject:* Re: Cassandra driver performance question...
>
> Hello tony,
> I couldnt reply earlier because I've been decora
now I am trying to get inserts to work via
JDBC. Running into issues there also but I will work at it till I get them to
work.
Regards,
-Tony
From: Jabbar Azam
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Cc: Tony Anecito
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2013 3:26 AM
Subject: Re: Cassandra driver performance question
is rare I use metadata.
>
> Regards,
> -Tony
>
> *From:* Tony Anecito
> *To:* "user@cassandra.apache.org" ; Tony
> Anecito
> *Sent:* Friday, June 21, 2013 9:33 PM
> *Subject:* Re: Cassandra driver performance question...
>
> Hi Jabbar,
>
>
.
Regards,
-Tony
From: Tony Anecito
To: "user@cassandra.apache.org" ; Tony Anecito
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 9:33 PM
Subject: Re: Cassandra driver performance question...
Hi Jabbar,
I think I know what is going on. I happened accross a change mentioned by the
jdbc driver
;user@cassandra.apache.org"
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 8:56 PM
Subject: Re: Cassandra driver performance question...
Thanks Jabbar,
I ran nodetool as suggested and it 0 latency for the row count I have.
I also ran cli list command for the table hit by my JDBC perparedStatement and
i
Tony
From: Jabbar Azam
To: user@cassandra.apache.org; Tony Anecito
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 3:32 PM
Subject: Re: Cassandra driver performance question...
Hello Tony,
I would guess that the first queries data is put into the row cache and the
filesystem cache. The second query gets the
Hello Tony,
I would guess that the first queries data is put into the row cache and
the filesystem cache. The second query gets the data from the row cache and
or the filesystem cache so it'll be faster.
If you want to make it consistently faster having a key cache will
definitely help. The foll
Hi All,
I am using jdbc driver and noticed that if I run the same query twice the
second time it is much faster.
I setup the row cache and column family cache and it not seem to make a
difference.
I am wondering how to setup cassandra such that the first query is always as
fast as the second on
No argument there. Thanks for explaining what you were doing to
encrypt client traffic!
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Chris Marino wrote:
> Hi Jonathan, yes, when I say 'node encryption' I mean inter-Cassandra node
> encryption. When I say 'client encryption' I mean encrypted traffic from th
Hi Jonathan, yes, when I say 'node encryption' I mean inter-Cassandra node
encryption. When I say 'client encryption' I mean encrypted traffic from
the Cassandra nodes to the clients. For these benchmarks we used the stress
test client load generator.
We ran test with no encryption, then with 'nod
Can you elaborate on to what exactly you were testing on the Cassandra
side? It sounds like what this post refers to as "node" encryption
corresponds to enabling "internode_encryption: all", but I couldn't
guess what your client encryption is since Cassandra doesn't support
that out of the box yet
sweet, that's pretty awesome :)
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Jeremy Hanna wrote:
> This might be helpful:
> http://techblog.netflix.com/2011/11/benchmarking-cassandra-scalability-on.html
>
> On Dec 30, 2011, at 1:59 PM, Dom Wong wrote:
>
> > Hi, could anyone tell me whether this is possible w
We did some benchmarking as well.
http://blog.vcider.com/2011/09/virtual-networks-can-run-cassandra-up-to-60-faster/
Although we were primarily interested in the networking issues
CM
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Jeremy Hanna
wrote:
> This might be helpful:
> http://techblog.netflix.c
This might be helpful:
http://techblog.netflix.com/2011/11/benchmarking-cassandra-scalability-on.html
On Dec 30, 2011, at 1:59 PM, Dom Wong wrote:
> Hi, could anyone tell me whether this is possible with Cassandra using an
> appropriately sized EC2 cluster.
>
> 100,000 clients writing 50k each
Hi, could anyone tell me whether this is possible with Cassandra using an
appropriately sized EC2 cluster.
100,000 clients writing 50k each to their own specific row at 5 second
intervals?
Ok - so I guess that between 1400 and 3500 inserts per second is reasonably
good results -- we are going to continue working on our custom code but it
seems like we need a design that uses lots of row-keys and fewer column
family keys and is heavily threaded.
Thanks for your help in pointing out t
Right, that's what I meant, thanks for the correction.
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Brandon Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Scott White wrote:
>
>> Yep I believe those are inserts per second. Take the last line:
>>
>> "811653,1666,250"
>>
>> I believe that's telling you t
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Scott White wrote:
> Yep I believe those are inserts per second. Take the last line:
>
> "811653,1666,250"
>
> I believe that's telling you that during that 10 second interval you did
> 1666 inserts but your overall insert rate is 811653/250 = 3246.612
> inserts/s
Yep I believe those are inserts per second. Take the last line:
"811653,1666,250"
I believe that's telling you that during that 10 second interval you did
1666 inserts but your overall insert rate is 811653/250 = 3246.612
inserts/sec.
Timeouts may be due to your machine(s) being fully saturated?
Ok I ran the stress test with out of box settings -- 50 threads and 1M row
inserts. It seems to get as high as 4400 ops per second and as low as 968.
Am I reading these correctly as inserts per second?
These are results below. But is also generates timeouts and failures in the
python code like
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 10:45 AM, malcolm smith <
malsm...@treehousesystems.com> wrote:
> I've been getting a feel for the performance elements of Cassandra using
> version 0.51. I've done similar tests on HBase before, but Cassandra has
> some very appealing aspects that I would like to pursue.
I've been getting a feel for the performance elements of Cassandra using
version 0.51. I've done similar tests on HBase before, but Cassandra has
some very appealing aspects that I would like to pursue.
However I'm not seeing the what seems like the common level of performance
others are seeing.
30 matches
Mail list logo
