, of course.
>
>From:Wz1975 [mailto:wz1...@yahoo.com]
>Sent: 14 октября 2013 г. 7:20
>To: user@cassandra.apache.org
>
>Subject: Re: one big cluster vs multiple smaller clusters
>Importance: Low
>
>we have choices of making one big cluster vs a few small clusters. I am trying
&g
gt; -Wei
>
> Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&T
>
>
> Original message
> Subject: Re: one big cluster vs multiple smaller clusters
> From: Jon Haddad
> To: user@cassandra.apache.org
> CC:
>
>
>
> This is a pretty vague questio
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: one big cluster vs multiple smaller clusters
Importance: Low
we have choices of making one big cluster vs a few small clusters. I am trying
to get pros and cons for both options in genera.
Thanks.
-Wei
Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&a
we have choices of making one big cluster vs a few small clusters. I am trying
to get pros and cons for both options in genera.
Thanks.
-Wei
Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&T
Original message
Subject: Re: one big cluster vs multiple smaller clusters
From: Jon Ha
This is a pretty vague question. What are you trying to achieve?
On Oct 12, 2013, at 9:05 PM, Wei Zhu wrote:
> Hi,
> As we bring more use cases to Cassandra, we have been thinking about the best
> way to host it. Let's say we will have 15 physical machines available, we can
> use all of them
Hi,
As we bring more use cases to Cassandra, we have been thinking about the best
way to host it. Let's say we will have 15 physical machines available, we can
use all of them to form a big cluster or divide them into 3 clusters with 5
nodes each. As we will deploy to 1.2, it becomes easier to
