Re: need of regular nodetool repair

2012-04-11 Thread aaron morton
HH in 1.X+ is very good, but it is still an optimisation for achieving consistency. >> So I expect that even if I loose some HH then some other replica will reply >> with data. Is it correct? Run a repair and see. Cheers - Aaron Morton Freelance Developer @aaronmorton http:/

Re: need of regular nodetool repair

2012-04-11 Thread Igor
On 04/11/2012 12:04 PM, ruslan usifov wrote: HH - this is hinted handoff? Yes 2012/4/11 Igor mailto:i...@4friends.od.ua>> On 04/11/2012 11:49 AM, R. Verlangen wrote: Not everything, just HH :) I hope this works for me for the next reasons: I have quite large RF (6 datacente

Re: need of regular nodetool repair

2012-04-11 Thread ruslan usifov
HH - this is hinted handoff? 2012/4/11 Igor > On 04/11/2012 11:49 AM, R. Verlangen wrote: > > Not everything, just HH :) > > I hope this works for me for the next reasons: I have quite large RF (6 > datacenters, each carry one replica of all dataset), read and write at CL > ONE, relatively smal

Re: need of regular nodetool repair

2012-04-11 Thread Igor
On 04/11/2012 11:49 AM, R. Verlangen wrote: Not everything, just HH :) I hope this works for me for the next reasons: I have quite large RF (6 datacenters, each carry one replica of all dataset), read and write at CL ONE, relatively small TTL - 10 days, I have no deletes, servers almost never

Re: need of regular nodetool repair

2012-04-11 Thread R. Verlangen
Well, if everything works 100% at any time there should be nothing to repair, however with a distributed cluster it would be pretty rare for that to occur. At least that is how I interpret this. 2012/4/11 Igor > BTW, I heard that we don't need to run repair if all your data have TTL, > all HH w

Re: need of regular nodetool repair

2012-04-11 Thread Igor
BTW, I heard that we don't need to run repair if all your data have TTL, all HH works, and you never delete your data. On 04/11/2012 11:34 AM, ruslan usifov wrote: Sorry fo my bad english, so QUORUM allow doesn't make repair regularity? But form your anser it does not follow 2012/4/11 R. Ve

Re: need of regular nodetool repair

2012-04-11 Thread ruslan usifov
Sorry fo my bad english, so QUORUM allow doesn't make repair regularity? But form your anser it does not follow 2012/4/11 R. Verlangen > Yes, I personally have configured it to perform a repair once a week, as > the GCGraceSeconds is at 10 days. > > This is also what's in the manual > http://wi

Re: need of regular nodetool repair

2012-04-11 Thread R. Verlangen
Yes, I personally have configured it to perform a repair once a week, as the GCGraceSeconds is at 10 days. This is also what's in the manual http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/Operations#Repairing_missing_or_inconsistent_data (point 2) 2012/4/11 ruslan usifov > Hello > > I have follow question, i

need of regular nodetool repair

2012-04-11 Thread ruslan usifov
Hello I have follow question, if we Read and write to cassandra claster with QUORUM consistency level, does this allow to us do not call nodetool repair regular? (i.e. every GCGraceSeconds)