-
> *From:* "Hiller, Dean"
> *To:* "user@cassandra.apache.org" ; Wei Zhu <
> wz1...@yahoo.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, December 10, 2012 1:13 PM
> *Subject:* Re: multiget_slice SlicePredicate
>
> What's wrong with multiget…parallel performance is gre
,
> Dean
>
> From: Wei Zhu mailto:wz1...@yahoo.com>>
> Reply-To: "user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>"
> mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>>, Wei Zhu
> mailto:wz1...@yahoo.com>>
> Date: Monday, December 10, 2012 3:15 PM
> To: Cassa
t;mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>"
mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>>, Wei Zhu
mailto:wz1...@yahoo.com>>
Date: Monday, December 10, 2012 3:15 PM
To: Cassandr usergroup
mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: multiget_slice SlicePredicate
Well, not sure how parallel is multi
definition from Cassandra site for
reference.
You are right, the count is for each individual row.
Thanks.
-WeiÂ
From: "Hiller, Dean"
To: "user@cassandra.apache.org" ; Wei Zhu
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: mul
ahoo.com>>
Date: Monday, December 10, 2012 2:07 PM
To: Cassandr usergroup
mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>>
Subject: multiget_slice SlicePredicate
I know it's probably not a good idea to use multiget, but for my use case, it's
the only choice,
I have question regardi
I know it's probably not a good idea to use multiget, but for my use case, it's
the only choice,
I have question regarding the SlicePredicate argument of the multiget_slice
The SlicePredicate takes slice_range which takes start, end and range. I
suppose start and end will apply to each individ
