Re: iterate over all the rows with RP

2010-12-13 Thread David Boxenhorn
Shimi, I am using Hector to do exactly what you want to do, with no problems. (In fact, the question didn't even occur to me...) On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Ran Tavory wrote: > This should be the case, yes, semantics isn't affected by the > connection and state isn't kept. What might happe

Re: iterate over all the rows with RP

2010-12-12 Thread Ran Tavory
This should be the case, yes, semantics isn't affected by the connection and state isn't kept. What might happen if you read/write with low consistency levels then when you hit a different host on the ring it might have an inconsistent state in case of partition. On Sunday, December 12, 2010, shim

Re: iterate over all the rows with RP

2010-12-12 Thread shimi
So if I will use a different connection (thrift via Hector), will I get the same results? It's make sense when you use OPP and I assume it is the same with RP. I just wanted to make sure this is the case and there is no state which is kept. Shimi On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Peter Schuller w

Re: iterate over all the rows with RP

2010-12-12 Thread Peter Schuller
> Is the same connection is required when iterating over all the rows with > Random Paritioner or is it possible to use a different connection for each > iteration? In general, the choice of RPC connection (I assume you mean the underlying thrift connection) does not affect the semantics of the RP

iterate over all the rows with RP

2010-12-12 Thread shimi
Is the same connection is required when iterating over all the rows with Random Paritioner or is it possible to use a different connection for each iteration? Shimi