Yup, unframed transport was removed in 0.8.beta 2.
I'll fix the comments, thanks.
Aaron
-
Aaron Morton
Freelance Developer
@aaronmorton
http://www.thelastpickle.com
On 25/01/2012, at 10:27 PM, Jools Enticknap wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'm currently running 1.0.7, and just notic
Hi All,
I'm currently running 1.0.7, and just noticed a small error in the comment
section.
# Frame size for thrift (maximum field length).
# 0 disables TFramedTransport in favor of TSocket. This option
# is deprecated; we strongly recommend using Framed mode.
thrift_framed_transport_size_in_mb
Hi All,
I've been writing a OSX cassandra data browser, and found that later versions
now only work using the FramedTransport.
As a result I've created a Framed Transport for the thrift cocoa library, and
created a JIRA THRIFT-1503.
Cheers,
--
Jools Enticknap
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:51 PM, aaron morton wrote:
> From changes.txt =
> https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/cassandra-0.8.0/CHANGES.txt#L687
> "
> make framed transport the default so malformed requests can't OOM the=20=
>
> server (CASSANDRA-475)
>
From changes.txt =
https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/cassandra-0.8.0/CHANGES.txt#L687
"
make framed transport the default so malformed requests can't OOM the=20=
server (CASSANDRA-475)
"
btw, you *really* should upgrade.
Cheers
-
Aaron Morton
Free
My cassandra version is 0.6.3, what is the advantage of framed transport?
-邮件原件-
发件人: Jonathan Ellis [mailto:jbel...@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2011年6月20日 10:56
收件人: user@cassandra.apache.org
主题: Re: framed transport and buffered transport
The most important difference is that only framed is
The most important difference is that only framed is supported in 0.8+
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Donna Li wrote:
> All:
>
> What is the difference of framed transport and buffered transport? And what
> is the advantage and disadvantage of the two different transports?
>
&
All:
What is the difference of framed transport and buffered transport? And
what is the advantage and disadvantage of the two different transports?
Thanks
Donna li
, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
>>
>> I don't think you can (although in 0.7 framed is the default for Pig
>> like everything else).
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Mark wrote:
>>>
>>> How does one enable framed transport when using the pig loa
hing else).
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Mark wrote:
How does one enable framed transport when using the pig loadfunc?
Thanks
I don't think you can (although in 0.7 framed is the default for Pig
like everything else).
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Mark wrote:
> How does one enable framed transport when using the pig loadfunc?
>
> Thanks
>
--
Jonathan Ellis
Project Chair, Apache Cassandra
co-f
How does one enable framed transport when using the pig loadfunc?
Thanks
I'm not aware of any performance implications of this.
2010/5/7 王一锋 :
> Hi everyone,
>
> Can anyone throw a light at the
> benefits of using framed transport over non-framed transport?
>
> We are trying to sum up some performance tuning approaches of cassandra in
>
Hi everyone,
Can anyone throw a light at the benefits of using framed transport over
non-framed transport?
We are trying to sum up some performance tuning approaches of cassandra in our
project.
Can framed transport be counted?
Thanks
2010-05-08
I am occasionally getting a missing timestamp error during
> batch_mutate calls. It happens both on framed and buffered transports, but
> when it happens on a framed transport, the server crashes. Is this typical?
>
> Lee Parker
>
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Nathan McCall
It appears that after some testing, the buffered transport seems more
stable. I am occasionally getting a missing timestamp error during
batch_mutate calls. It happens both on framed and buffered transports, but
when it happens on a framed transport, the server crashes. Is this typical?
Lee
FWIW, We just exposed this as an option in hector.
-Nate
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Miguel Verde wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
>>
>> But, if you've enabled framing on the server, you will not
>> be able to use C# clients (last I ch
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
> But, if you've enabled framing on the server, you will not
> be able to use C# clients (last I checked, there was no framed transport
> for C#).
There *are* many clients that don't have framed transports, but the C#
cli
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 09:49 -0500, Lee Parker wrote:
> What is the benefit of moving to framed transport as opposed to
> buffered transport?
The framed transport probably provides better (smarter) buffering, but
it was added in Thrift to support asynchronous servers. In a perfect
world,
What is the benefit of moving to framed transport as opposed to buffered
transport?
Lee Parker
l...@spredfast.com
[image: Spredfast]
20 matches
Mail list logo
