Hi Sasha,
There's been a lot of fud in regards to SuperColumns. But actually in
our case we found them quite useful.
The main argument for using SC in that case is that message metadata is
immutable and in most of the cases read and written alltogether (i.e.
you fetch all message headers tog
Hi Rustam,
Thanks for posting that.
Interesting to see that you opted to use Super Column's:
https://github.com/elasticinbox/elasticinbox/wiki/Data-Model ..
wondering, for the sake of argument/discussion .. if anyone can come
up with an alternative data model that doesn't use SC's.
-sd
On Fri,
Hi Sasha,
Replying to the old thread just for reference. We've released a code
which we use to store emails in Cassandra as an open source project:
http://elasticinbox.com/
Hope you find it helpful.
Regards,
Rustam.
On Fri Apr 29 15:20:07 2011, Sasha Dolgy wrote:
Great read. thanks.
On A
Great read. thanks.
On Apr 29, 2011 4:07 PM, "sridhar basam" wrote:
> Have you already looked at some research out of IBM about this usecase?
> Paper is at
>
> http://ewh.ieee.org/r6/scv/computer/nfic/2009/IBM-Jun-Rao.pdf
>
> Sridhar
Have you already looked at some research out of IBM about this usecase?
Paper is at
http://ewh.ieee.org/r6/scv/computer/nfic/2009/IBM-Jun-Rao.pdf
Sridhar
Hi,
Previous discussions have covered cassandra not being the best at
storing large binary files and it makes more sense to store pointers
to the files in cassandra and for the files themselves to be stored on
a local file system or some other entity like amazon s3, etc.
if i wanted to funnel all
