ser@cassandra.apache.org>"
mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>>
Date: Thursday, March 28, 2013 3:18 AM
To: "user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>"
mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: bloom filter fp ratio of 0.98 with fp_chance o
Message -----
> From: "Andras Szerdahelyi"
> To: user@cassandra.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 1:19:06 AM
> Subject: Re: bloom filter fp ratio of 0.98 with fp_chance of 0.01
>
>
> Aaron,
>
>
>
>
> What version are you using ?
L0 ,
> would it?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks!!
> Andras
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: aaron morton < aa...@thelastpickle.com >
> Reply-To: " user@cassandra.apache.org " < user@cassandra.apache.org >
> Date: Tuesday 26 March 2013 21:46
>
the related thread for your reference.
-Wei
- Original Message -
From: "Andras Szerdahelyi"
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 1:19:06 AM
Subject: Re: bloom filter fp ratio of 0.98 with fp_chance of 0.01
Aaron,
What version are you using
kle.com>>
Reply-To: "user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>"
mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>>
Date: Tuesday 26 March 2013 21:46
To: "user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>"
mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>&
What version are you using ?
1.2.0 allowed a null bf chance, and I think it returned .1 for LCS and .01 for
STS compaction.
Have you changed the bf_ chance ? The sstables need to be rebuilt for it to
take affect.
> and sstables read is in the skies
Not sure what this means.
Are you saying it
Hello list,
Could anyone shed some light on how an FP chance of 0.01 coexist with a
measured FP ratio of .. 0.98 ? Am I reading this wrong or are 98% of the
requests hitting the bloom filter create a false positive while the "target"
false ratio is 0.01?
( Also key cache hit ratio is around 0.0
